David Didau: Over the course of history, many things people assumed to be true have turned out to be鈥 a bit iffy. The earth is not flat, whales are not big fish and burying a cat at midnight is in fact not the best way of tackling toothache.
But of course, in the modern world, our understandings are more dependable and based on evidence. Especially when it comes to education and the development of learning experiences. Right?
Well, let鈥檚 have a look at a few commonly-understood 鈥渇acts鈥濃
Number One 鈥 We learn more effectively if we receive information in our preferred learning style.
In other words, we all have a certain type of input that works best for us. For some people it鈥檚 visual, for some it鈥檚 auditory, and for others it鈥檚 kinaesthetic. In a recent survey, a rather whopping 93% of teachers said that they believe this. The only problem is that it鈥檚鈥RONG.
Study after study has shown that there鈥檚 no benefit at all in presenting information to people in their 鈥榩referred鈥 format.
What does work, is presenting information that鈥檚 appropriate to the context of what鈥檚 being taught. If you鈥檙e learning about maps and borders for example, visual information will be far more effective than a verbal description. And if you want to figure out chord structures, theories probably won鈥檛 sink in unless you thump away at a piano.
Number Two 鈥 Environments that are rich in stimuli improve younger children鈥檚 brains.
The more stuff young kids have to interact with, the more they鈥檙e going to learn. This is pretty obvious, but also鈥 WRONG.Of course, we need stimuli to learn. But, the more cluttered an environment is, the less likely a child is to be able to concentrate on any one thing.
An overload of stimuli 鈥 lots of different things competing for attention - actually diminishes learning ability.
Number Three 鈥 People learn differently, depending on whether they鈥檙e left-brain dominant or right-brain dominant.This is pretty much indisputable. It鈥檚 a well-known fact that left-brainers are logical and objective, whereas right-brainers are intuitive and subjective. Which would have a huge impact on learning鈥 if it wasn鈥檛 completely WRONG.
There鈥檚 actually no such thing as left-brained people and right-brained people. There are, of course, people who are more intuitive, and people who are more logical, but that鈥檚 not down to any differences in brain hemispheres. It鈥檚 just that everyone鈥檚 different.The left brain and right brain do perform slightly different processes, but we鈥檙e all using both sides, all the time.
Number Four 鈥 We only use 10% (or 20%) of our brains.
It鈥檚 not difficult to understand why this would be a popular idea. All those brain cells lying dormant鈥 imagine what a genius you鈥檇 be if one day you could get them all fired up鈥ut sadly there is no evidence for this idea 鈥 and it can be added to the pile of things that are entirely WRONG.
It鈥檚 true that we don鈥檛 use all the regions of the brain at the same time 鈥 but the whole thing does get used. Regularly, in fact.
Number Five 鈥 The more we practice multitasking, the better the brain gets at it.
This is something we all know. Nobody can succeed in today鈥檚 society without being able to juggle a host of simultaneous demands and tasks.
One small problem鈥 it鈥檚 completely WRONG.
Why? Because the human brain cannot multitask. If we define multitasking as 鈥渃arrying out two or more conscious thought processes at the same time, with no loss of speed or accuracy鈥, then no-one has ever been able to multitask.
When there are two tasks that have to be carried out at the same time, what we can do is task-switch 鈥 that means diverting attention from one to the other. But it鈥檚 not possible to focus on both at the same time.
Some people may be better than others at task switching, but nobody鈥檚 great at it. It always incurs what鈥檚 called a switching penalty 鈥 we get slower, less efficient, and make more mistakes, every time we switch.
Doing one thing, finishing it and moving on to the next is always more effective than trying to juggle.
Number Six 鈥 Learning can be observed.
Give someone some information. They repeat it back. Bingo! You鈥檝e just observed them learning.
WRONG!
When someone repeats something, they鈥檙e simply mimicking. They鈥檙e only using their working, and that鈥檚 not the same thing as learning.
True learning is not about the here and now, but about elsewhere and later. Things have only really been learned if they can be remembered in the long term, and transferred to new contexts.
This misunderstanding of what actually constitutes learning is probably the biggest blind spot in modern education. Teachers often want to measure success by seeing if pupils are able to repeat important points there and then, in the lesson. But ascertaining if learning has actually taken place is not easy. The real question should be, will this knowledge make it through to the student鈥檚 long term memory?
So鈥 a few more facts to fill history鈥檚 bin, and perhaps some ways to create more effective learning experiences.