Enforcing law and order - courts and juries
In medieval Britain, there was a system of courts. These were intended to make trials run efficiently and to ensure all cases could be heard in a reasonable time frame.
Royal courts
- The royal courts were run by a professional, paid judge with the assistance of a juryA group of people (usually 12 in number) who listen to the facts of a case in a court and give their verdict. from the criminal鈥檚 area.
- They tried the most serious of crimes.
- After 1293, royal judges travelled to each county two or three times per year to hold trials for the serious crimes in that area.
- They were called the county assizesThe main courts for dealing with serious crimes until 1971.
Hundred courts, quarter sessions and borough courts
- The royal courts could not hold all the trials needed - there would have been too many.
- The county sheriffThe monarch鈥檚 chief law enforcer in each county. ran additional courts in each hundred - known as hundred courts.
- After 1361, Justice of the Peace Someone responsible for maintaining law and order in a county. Often abbreviated to JP. took over this role.
- They held courts four times per year, known as the quarter sessions Courts held every three months when a group of JPs would hear serious cases.
Justices of the Peace
JPs were local nobles and gentryPeople who belong to the class below the nobility. who carried out the job on an unpaid basis. There were usually three or four in each county. They took over some of the work of the royal courts and dealt with a wide range of cases. However, they did not have the authority to rule on the most serious crimes. Again, there would be a jury made up of local people.
In the towns, borough courts carried out a similar role.
Manor courts
- Most medieval crimes were tried in the manor courts, which were run by the lord in his own village or manor.
- Wealthy villagers sat on the jury. They mainly dealt with petty crimes such as theft and debts, usually committed by the landowner鈥檚 villeinSomeone who worked without pay for their lord in return for land.
- They might also deal with petty crimes that affected the whole community, such as fighting.
Church courts
- The Church had its own system of courts to try priests and other members of the clergyPeople who conduct religious services, especially in the Christian church.
- The Church could also put on trial anyone accused of offences such as adulterySexual intercourse between a married person and another person who is not their spouse. homosexuality, gambling or failing to attend church.
- There were no juries in the Church courts. Instead, priests passed judgement.
Juries
- Juries always came from the accused鈥檚 local area.
- They were expected to use their knowledge of the criminal鈥檚 background and character to help them reach a verdict.