Flood management - CCEA - ��ý Bitesize

River management

Causes of flooding

A flood occurs when a river bursts its banks and the water spills onto the .

The causes of are usually a result of both physical and human factors.

Physical factors are those which are caused by nature.

Human factors are when human intervention and interference create the conditions for flooding.

Physical causes

Precipitation	The more rain that falls onto a drainage basin over a short period of time, the more likely that there will be some flooding in a river channel. Heavy or prolonged rainfall can lead to flooding.
Soil and rock	Different types of soil and rock will dictate whether the water flows through or stays close to the surface. Some soil or rock is impermeable, which means they do not allow water to infiltrate soil or percolate rock. Once soil and rock is saturated, or if it is impermeable, the water will become surface runoff and will run into river channels more quickly.
Land use	A drainage basin with little vegetation is more likely to flood quickly as there is no vegetation to intercept the water and remove it from the surface runoff.
Steep slopes	Areas where the drainage basin is small and valley sides are steep will return water to the river channel much more quickly than places where the slopes are gentler.

Human causes

Deforestation	Removing trees will reduce interception and increase the amount of water going into the river system.
River management	Sometimes measures taken to manage the river can increase the amount of water in the river. Putting concrete into a river to speed up the movement of water in one part of the river can cause flooding further downstream.
Global warming	As sea levels rise, there will be an increase in the amount of water available for evaporation and precipitation in the water cycle. This means that more water could be falling onto drainage basins than usual.
Urban growth	Impermeable concrete/tarmac roads and pipe/drain systems in urban areas can speed up the delivery of water back into the river channel making a flash flood more likely to occur.

British Isles case study: Boscastle flood (2004)

Boscastle is a small coastal settlement in the south west of England.

It flooded in August 2004, washing cars and buildings into the sea and putting peoples' lives in danger.

Boscastle is at the of two rivers - the Valency and the Jordan.

A large quantity of water arrived within a short space of time causing the rivers to overflow.

The flooding coincided with a high tide, making the impact much worse.

Physical causes of the Boscastle flood	Human causes of the Boscastle flood
Rain for 12 out of 14 days in August.	Many trees had been cut down for farming. This limited interception and water went straight into the river channel.
A depression brought a thunderstorm on 16 August with over 200mm of rain in 24 hours.	Increase in buildings within the drainage basin meant that there were more impermeable surfaces which directed water back to the river faster.
Steep valley sides - water flowed into the river channel very quickly.	A few old arch bridges got blocked up with the flood debris. The bridge acted like a dam and eventually smashed through causing a surge of water up to 3m high.
The rock in the local area is impermeable slate which does not allow percolation.
The soils were quite thin and made up of impermeable peat soils. These became saturated so water became surface run-off very quickly
There were very few trees to absorb water and slow the amount of water going into the river.

Diagram on flood management following the Boscastle flood. — Figure caption,
Flood management following the Boscastle flood.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The ��ý's Fergus Walsh explains why the village of Boscastle in northern Cornwall flooded in 2004.

Impact of flooding

Floods can cause damage to homes and possessions as well as disruption to communications. However, flooding can also have positive impacts on an area.

Flooding fine silt () onto the , making it very fertile and excellent for agriculture. People living on or near floodplains may rely upon regular flooding to help support their farming and therefore provide food.

Less economically developed countries tend to be affected more than more economically developed countries by the effects of flooding.

This is partly because LEDCs have more farms, and farming communities are attracted to fertile flood plains. LEDCs often do not have the resources to prevent flooding or deal with the aftermath of flooding.

Impacts on people and the environment

Impacts on people	Impacts on the environment
Loss of life: Floods can cause death and injury. People can get trapped in their houses by the quick rising waters.	Pollution: Floods will wash chemicals and sewage into the water. The contaminated water will spread quickly over an area – causing public health issues and killing fish.
Property: As flood waters rise they can flow into low-lying properties. The river will be carrying huge amounts of pollution and silt that will destroy floors, walls and any electrical gear.	Destruction of wildlife habitat: Floods will destroy places where river animals and fish might have breeding grounds. Even slight changes to river temperature and water patterns can upset natural ecosystems.
Insurance cover: Some people who live close to river courses find it difficult to get insurance whilst others cannot afford the insurance premiums. The cost of repairing and rebuilding damaged buildings can push up insurance premiums.	Water recharge: Floods can bring water back to dry areas (e.g. along the course of the river Nile in Egypt). Floods will ensure that there is water for irrigation or for drinking water in dry places.

Flood management methods

Steps can be taken to manage flooding. This is known as . Often these steps involve trying to lengthen the amount of time it takes for water to reach the river channel, thereby increasing the lag time. Rivers can be managed by using hard or soft engineering.

Hard engineering is when construction is used to prevent the risk of flooding. tend to be more expensive and have a greater impact on the river and the surrounding landscape. They will require more extensive alterations to the river to try to stop flooding.

Soft engineering is where natural methods are used to reduce the risk of flooding. are usually more ecologically sensitive. They will attempt to manage flood rather than prevent it.

Hard engineering

Soft engineering

CASE STUDY: The Mississippi River, USA

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The Mississippi Rivers drainage basin covers 3 million km², half the land area of the United States of America. That is ten times the size of the UK and Ireland combined.

The river network flows south to the Gulf of Mexico where it has formed a 150km wide floodplain. Such low lying, fertile land is very attractive for agriculture, transport and human settlement.

Under natural conditions, heavy rainfall between January and April combine with spring snow melt to cause the Mississippi to flood.

To use the river and build settlements along its banks, the US Corps of Engineers has been working for over 120 years to tame or control the Mississippi. The river no longer floods annually but the devastating flood in 1993 and a smaller event in 2022 showed that, despite their efforts, flooding is still a risk.

Many engineering strategies have been attempted along the Mississippi, while some are designed to maintain a safe route for boats and barges most address the flooding problem.

Hard engineering on the Mississippi

Image caption,
Dam and reservoir on a tributary river

There are 27 large dams on the Upper Mississippi River and over 100 dams constructed along its tributaries, including the Missouri, Tennessee and Ohio rivers.

One key aim of these is to store floodwater in their reservoirs during times of high discharge.

The sustainability of dams and reservoirs

Positives
The reservoirs have the capacity to prevent the ‘normal’ annual river floods. Therefore, they protect over 20 million people living further downstream.
Many dams also produce hydroelectricity, a source of ‘green’ energy and the water storage in reservoirs ensures a reliable water supply for the domestic and agricultural needs of nearly 20 million people.

Negatives
Dams are expensive to build and maintain. In the State of Mississippi itself, dam repairs cost $40 million.
While designed to trap floodwater, dams also trap silt. This means clear water erosion is increased and the silt supply to the delta has been reduced. This can cause coastal erosion and the loss of habitat. Numbers of delta wildlife, including herons have fallen dramatically.
Formerly, river silt was spread as alluvium across the river’s floodplain. This no longer happens, so expensive additional fertiliser is now needed to enrich the farmland soils.

Levees

These artificially raised earth banks have been constructed since the 1930s and today they are 15m in height and extend for over 3000km of the river’s banks.

Floodwalls

In riverside cities, such as St Louis, the levees are often replaced by floodwalls, which use less land.

The sustainability of levees and floodwalls

Positives
Levees have reduced the number of flood incidents dramatically.
Development of farmland on the floodplain has been made possible. Towns and cities have developed along the river and on its floodplain. Around 70 million people live in the Mississippi basin, that’s 20% of the population of the USA.

Negatives
Levees are expensive both to construct and maintain, especially on the scale of this river with 3000km of riverbank.
By trapping silt in the river, the riverbed has been raised above the floodplain. In New Orleans the riverbed is 4.3m (as high as a two-storey house) above the city. So, when the levees fail the floodwater flow can be devastating, as seen in the 2011 event.
While levees do prevent floods where they are built, they can push floodwater downstream to unprotected areas, which then flood.
By preventing floods levees also prevent alluvium from spreading across the floodplain, leading to the need for expensive fertiliser to maintain the soil for agriculture.

Soft engineering on the Mississippi

Land use zoning or safe flood zones. — Figure caption,
Land use zoning or safe flood zones

Planning legislation has been used to restrict building development on areas of the flood plain. Sometimes the land, at risk of flooding has been bought by government.

An example is Rock Island, Illinois which the US Conservation Service purchased for $25 million.

The sustainability of land use zoning

Positives
This prevents the construction of property in flood risk zones.
The return of land to its natural state such as wetlands has no negative environmental impact.
Little to no maintenance is required.

Negatives
The initial cost of buying land or compensating property owners may be high.

Afforestation

Large scale tree planting across the catchment area of the Mississippi river’s tributaries aims to reduce and slow down runoff. From 1933-53 over 240 million tree seedlings were planted in the Tennessee River Valley, trees reach maturity in 20 to 40 years. Today, the forest covers 5.7 million hectares, over half of the Tennessee Valley’s drainage basin area.

The sustainability afforestation

Positives
The trees, through the natural processes of interception and uptake, have reduced the amount of water reaching the river.
Forests require little maintenance, but properly managed they are a valuable economic resource.

Negatives
To make a significant impact a large-scale programme is needed and it takes decades for trees to be mature enough to have a significant impact.

Washlands and spillways

Spillways are designed to redirect floodwater away from the Mississippi main river channel, to be temporarily stored on designated areas of the floodplain (Washlands).

The Morganza Spillway, Louisiana has 125 opening gates through which up to half of the river’s discharge can be redirected onto low density populated farmland.

The sustainability of washlands and spillways

Positives
The Morganza Spillway was opened during the 2011 extreme event, over 12 000km² of farmland was deliberately flooded. This action prevented millions of dollars of property damage in the city of New Orleans further downstream.
After the initial expense maintenance costs are low.

Negatives
Use of the washland requires the mass evacuation of people and livestock and the swamping of any crops being grown. Farmers must be compensated for their losses.

Image caption,
The Morganza spillway on the Mississippi river is a flood relief channel.

Sustainable development

Social, economic and environmental impacts.

The United Nations have defined sustainability in 1987 as,

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

An evaluation that refers to the principles of sustainable development needs to consider the social, environmental and economic impacts that each management strategy might have.

Social impacts refer to how a management method will affect people. It will look at how it impacts their houses and where they live, how it will affect their daily lives and their food and water supply.

Environmental impacts refer to how management methods will impact the natural environment. How will any development affect animals and plant life in the local area? How will it impact water quality and sewage?

Economic impacts refer to how the management methods used will affect how people work. How will this affect jobs and income? Will the measure make people richer or poorer – will it have a positive or negative impact on their livelihood?

��ý

Flood management - CCEA

River management

Causes of flooding