´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

Rushes Sequences - graphics - packet switching (Video)

Post categories: ,Ìý,Ìý

Dan Biddle Dan Biddle | 13:21 UK time, Thursday, 12 November 2009

In our continuing efforts to share as much content with you as possible, we present this graphics sequence from Digital Revolution production created to help explain packet switching. These graphics are a work in progress and may not be the final graphics used in the programme, but we are releasing them for you to download and reuse under the Digital Revolution licence.

This graphics sequence is part ofÌýour promise to release contentÌýfrom most of our interviews and some general footage, all underÌýa permissive licence for you to embed, or download a non-branded version and re-edit.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit ´óÏó´«Ã½ Webwise for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.





Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Could the 4 [blue] shapes that make up the packets be different colours? This way you illustrate that they [re]form in the same sequence at the end as the one they were in when they set out. It's important to convey that information isn't presented to the recipient in a random order.

    Otherwise I think it clearly shows that the packets travel via different routes.

  • Comment number 2.

    As I say in my reply on the other graphics blog post, these graphics are works in progress and lose a certain something without any explanatory accompaniment...

    I'll work on getting some more info, but ideas for this particular graphics sequence were raised and discussed on the blog /blogs/digitalrevolution/2009/08/please-check-our-tech.shtml">Please check our tech! - So you can reference there for some further info.

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Comment number 3.

    Hi Dan,
    I remember the 'check our tech' post. I do like the overall look & feel of the graphics; I like the music too.
    Just thought I'd give you my response as a viewer; I do appreciate they'll also have a commentary over them as well that'll provide explanation. I am trying to be constructive, not negative.
    I realise that all design jobs go through iterations, it is a process after all, and this is a work in progress.
    As I'm sure you will do, show to many people, get many opinions :-)
    Tim

  • Comment number 4.

    @SheffTim - sorry if that reply came over a bit defensive - not how it was meant - all comments and observations are totally welcome :)

    I think I'd put the 'thought' into my reply on the other graphics post, so I guess the 'just the facts' approach I offered there can be read as me being huffy. Not how I meant it. In fact I'm glad you pointed out that I'd not offered much of a back story to the graphics - I should have linked to the 'Please check our tech!' in the blog post, so glad you reminded me ;)

    Cheers,
    Dan

  • Comment number 5.

    Hi Dan
    It must be quite an 'experience' for the production team; putting clips of your work up for comment, before the episodes are completed or broadcast; comments from complete strangers too. I hope you are finding the process useful.

  • Comment number 6.

    +1 for SheffTim's suggestion about coloring the blue shapes in more rainbow colors. Doing that would also be consistent with Vint Cerf's analogy of postcards and time-date stamping at the top of his video rush:

    * /blogs/digitalrevolution/2009/11/rushes-sequences-vint-cerf-int.shtml


    Aesthetically, it might also be interesting in the graphics to show that Web data transmittance is not only between a PC in one household to another (and via satellite). It can also be between:

    * company office to household (this shows tele-working phenomenon afforded by Web connectivity).

    * Western-style house to remote village hut or even the beach.

    * PC to handheld mobile device.

    * increasingly wi-fi (with no wires near the UI terminal)


    I have to say that the network pylons in the main 'Visualizing the Web' were a bit difficult to distinguish at first. Maybe there should be some sort of electric yellow radial transmittance from them to indicate that they are broadcasting and receiving information? Sort of like the RKO transmitter (please see start of black+white films like 'Citizen Kane').

    If the color of the packets in the packets switching changes, so should the main Visualizing the Web graphic.

    Also in terms of subliminal references (quite apart from the importance of consistency with Vint Cerf's comments on precedence and priority marking), rainbow colors will remind us that there is a diversity of data and data senders/recipients on the Web. It's not all "blue" which has negative connotations to.......porn and sadness, as color psychologists would tell us.


    @Everyone --- I believe we're all learning from each other in this experiment and process. Certainly, there are comments which have been made that prompt me to re-think the Web, people who are contributing to it and where it might be heading. There's a whole wealth of links which are exposing us to content and context we may not have been aware of previously.

    Historically and by nature, production (whether it's a TV documentary, a film, a theater staging, a website or even something as dry as creating a financial product for mass consumers) is ORGANIC. There's a certain amount of structure / hierarchy and also the potential for miscommunications, but if the production is entered into by parties on an open, collaborative, democratic and iterative learning basis.......The end product tends to benefit and be better than if there was no reciprocal inputs and sanity-checking.

    That's from the pre-Web 2.0 days of broadcast. We're now well into the Age of Collaborative Reciprocity with social media.

  • Comment number 7.

    'Collaborative Reciprocity' - that's a good meme.

  • Comment number 8.

    Ha ha, xlnt, SheffTim. So on a Sunday after 6 solid hours of coding I coined "Collaborative Reciprocity" on the fly.

    Meanwhile, I spent several weeks thinking up the 'Web is GUNK (Great Universal Neural Kinesis)' concept and tried to rationalize its connectivity to gunk in mereology, Bertrand Russell and the junk that can be in our heads and then........you sent that Urban Dictionary link which means I have to go back to the think plane on that one. I don't like 'think tank', by the way. Who wants their thinking to tank? We want our thinking to soar!

    Anyway, "Collaborative Reciprocity" has its genealogy in two concepts I started using a while ago: reciprocity of respect and collaborative Double Dutch. The first clearly has its roots in the Christian tenet of "Do unto others as you would want to be done", Buddhist principles of karma and Judaic traditions. The second because as a child I used to skip Double Dutch and you quickly learn that if both sides contribute their fair share to turning the rope ONLY then does the rope move, there's energy (bi-directional transmittance) and EVERYONE HAS FUN!!!

    It's not like tug-of-war where the objective is to apply brute force to pull your competition in your direction.

    So then, as an adult, I analogize the chains of communications between the company and the consumer. In marketing there are concepts of information "push" (or as the Twitter founders call it "broadcast") and concepts of incentive "pulls" such as % reduction in price if you purchase online. However, that still operates in a tug-of-war mechanism!

    I believe there needs to be a change of mindset there too. Double Dutch is a much more productive analogy to aim for than tug-of-war.

    The aim of Collaborative Reciprocity is, of course, Multilateral Symbiosis between company, consumers, planet, production and economy.

    ALL FACILITATED AND FOSTERED BY THE WEB as a tool as well as a toy.

  • Comment number 9.

    I appreciate this is just to get the feel for packets, but it doesn’t look right to me. There are a couple of – relatively minor – changes that would make it closer to reality:

    - wherever the ‘pipes’ split or combine, there should be a box. There has to be a computer that inspects the packets to determine where to route them

    - the packets appear to catch up with each other, even recombining – at the first couple of corners. There’s no logic to that. Keep them apart.

  • Comment number 10.

    @daveofthenewcity - they are indeed rough guides, broken down and simplified, but I've passed your feedback on to Russell (Series Producer) and Frank (Programme Two Director) for them to consider. It's much appreciated.

    Dan

  • Comment number 11.

    PNAB. Whilst trying to think of a good example of Collaborative Reciprocity the recent YouTube Chartjackers charity song/video came to mind.

    "The lyrics of the [Chartjackers] song are made up of YouTube comments, compiled into a song by another YouTuber. The lyrics were released and then YouTubers wrote a melody for the lyrics, and we picked our favourite. We held YouTube auditions via video response to pick the band, found the producer of the song through YouTube, and the music video is made up of literal interpretations of the lyrics, clapping and singing along, by YouTubers! It's a bit YouTubey".


    Most cultures (but not all e.g. Aztecs) have come up with an ethic of reciprocity, otherwise known as the Golden Rule, including Taoist and Confucian.


    I like the idea of combining the words 'reciprocity' with 'collaborative', it gives it a sense of energy, focus, mutual endeavour and goals. Your Double Dutch example is a good one; for it to work all three people have to collaborate together; by changing positions all get to participate in the game and also learn from one another.

  • Comment number 12.

    Thanks for the links, SheffTim.

    Collective reciprocity will probably produce a smarter future than collusive irresponsibility. Examples of the latter are where different self-interest groups end up creating:

    • global financial crisis;

    • educational erosion;

    • media sensationalism; and

    • climate change acceleration, etc.


    Also, elsewhere here on ´óÏó´«Ã½DigRev site, we discussed the principles of online altruism in relation to potential reasons why Wikipedia and other social media attract and generate so much free information and user content. The current Achilles’ heel with online altruism is that it’s usually unilateral. Party A provides Party B with something of value, out of their goodwill and the hope that this goodness will propagate. Yet there’s no social contract on the second party to return in kind (or reciprocate with an equivalent) to Party A or transmit the altruism onwards. Unfortunately, sometimes Party B only takes or exploits Party A's goodwill.

    Collective reciprocity acts as a multilateral social contract to synergize each party’s contribution and to recognize (or credit) that participation.

    In certain ways, there’s collective reciprocity here @ ´óÏó´«Ã½DigRev.

    ´óÏó´«Ã½DigRev team provide us with this brainstorming space, humor us our tangential and related explorations and, at the same time, we’re collectively progressing towards a production that:

    (1.) meets corporate targets, ´óÏó´«Ã½â€™s.

    (2.) meets viewing audience curiosity and enjoyment, ours;

    (3.) is more accountable and has improved perspective than if it hadn’t been pre-filtered and contributed to by both sides.


    ´óÏó´«Ã½ respects and trusts its audience with the pre-production topics, ongoing rushes, naming game etc in the hope we (the audience) provide relevant, timely and intelligent input. We reciprocate that respect and trust by collaborating appropriately. Ergo, this hybrid production is our own version of Double Dutch in action.

    Of course, there is a double entendre for the term "double Dutch". The term can also refer to when two parties are communicating at cross-purposes. Naturally, the skipping example I gave before is a lot more fun and conducive in any project involving multiple parties.

    Interestingly, for me, I’ve practiced Collective Reciprocity long before I coined it as such --- LOL, :*).

  • Comment number 13.

    Hi there,

    Really nice series - use it for teaching at school. Could you guys do a RSS feed for the video interviews ?

    :)

Ìý

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.