´óÏó´«Ã½

Why has an ostensibly curry-eating contest been described by so many on-line British newspapers - including this one - as a "chilli-eating contest"? Is this because the target audience of ALL online English-language news output is in the US where no-one is presumed to have heard of curry? Shame on you all.
Vin de Loue, Marlow, UK

Re: Six ways to never get lost in a city again. What, navigating using your brain and things you can see, rather than a multi billion pound satellite network - that's just crazy talk!
Gordon Stewardson

Another unfortunate case of nominitive determinism for the unlucky curry eater.
Fi, Gloucestershire, UK

Does this really show how fish evolved to live on land? To me it shows how fish attempt to get back into the water.
Tom Webb, Surbiton, UK

Re: House prices lacking direction, says the Halifax. Really? Might I be permitted to suggest one?
Sue, London

Clare (Wednesday's Letters), I disagree with Cindy's article, and have no wish to "manage my online presence". I am happy with my values and on the whole keep to them, but some people would violently disagree with my opinions. I think a total lack of privacy would make people even more hypocritical - eager to show that they think the 'right' way.
I am more complex than a webpage, have more dimensions than a blog and more character than a Twitter. I am not defined purely by my actions, but also by my relationships and each relationship is unique. If you want to know me, you would have to live with me, not Google me.
Andrew, Malvern, UK

Thank goodness we're possibly doing away with privacy. I would like to claim my rights to royalty money for every time the ´óÏó´«Ã½ has published my photo to illustrate drunken misdemeanors - that's me, just above the picture of Mark Zuckerberg. Please form an orderly queue behind me.
Ross, London

• Bookmark with:
• |
• |
• - What's this?