Tuesday 1 March 2011
Here's Emily with news of what's coming up at 10.30pm on 大象传媒 Two...
John Galliano's anti-Semitic remarks could have turned into a full scale diplomatic crisis. Why? Because, as any fashionista knows, Dior - who he designs for - is the label worn by one Mrs Sarkozy.
Carla Bruni started life as a Dior model and has remained loyal to the house ever since. As things turned out, Dior was not prepared to see a YouTube video start a new war in the Middle East. They sacked Galliano earlier today. And the first lady of France is now free to wear Dior again.
Anyway, I write that in passing because there are, as you know, currently more pressing diplomatic affairs at hand.
Tonight, Niall Ferguson, author of Civilization, will help us examine the role of the West in the revolution in the Arab world - and explain what history can tell us about why certain cultures appear to dominate the world at certain times.
We'll also be asking whether the government's done enough in its adjustment to the international development aid budget to allay criticism that we are funnelling money into dodgy dictatorships and into countries that are economically far more successful than we are.
Plus, the European Court of Justice has declared it is discriminatory to charge women less than men for their car insurance. Women are better drivers. Men die younger. What's wrong with discrimination within the free market?
Join me at 10.30pm on 大象传媒 Two.
Emily
-----------------------------------------------------------
From earlier today...
A humanitarian crisis involving thousands of Egyptian migrant workers stranded on the Tunisian border is worsening.
About 2,000 people are crossing into Tunisia every hour, but once in Tunisia many of them have nowhere to go. Another 20,000 are said to be backed up on the Libyan side.
Tonight we hope to have a report from a liberated town in the west of the country, where people are extremely worried about Colonel Gaddafi's forces coming back and want a no-fly zone put in place.
Tim Whewell will explain what such a no-fly zone would actually mean and outline what military assets Col Gaddafi has at his disposal.
Then Allan Little will look at Britain's historical role in the Arab world and to what extent it is to blame for events there.
Plus we're also looking at the government plans to stop direct development aid to 16 countries and freeze the level of assistance given to India.
More details later.
Comment number 1.
At 1st Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:It is ridiculous to give foreign aid at a time when Britain is bankrupt. Old saying: charity begins at home.......
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 1st Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 1st Mar 2011, Uncle Munkle wrote:yeah 1penny in every 10pounds Tax grrr makes ya MAD
thing is where's the other 9.99 in fact going?
Better sack a soldier, ruin an education, cut services
but we must have a nuclear deterrent and decent tax breaks for the multi-nationals and banks its just a matter of priorities see
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 1st Mar 2011, Uncle Munkle wrote:PAYDAY FOR INSURERS EURO COURT RULING
BET-YA THEY'RE LAFFIN ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK
...insurers contradicted the wider European principle of gender equality.
"Taking the gender of the insured individual into account as a risk factor in insurance contracts constitutes discrimination," the ECJ said.
The British Insurance Brokers' Association (BIBA) said currently the cost of the average car claim by an 18-year old man was 拢4,400, while that for an 18-year old woman was 拢2,700.
/news/business-12606610
WELL IT WASNT GOING TO GET ANY CHEAPER NOW WAS IT!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 1st Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:equality of risk.
Those who are of less risk must pay the same as those with more risk because its 'equality'?
this might make sense in the Wicker Man society or at a 'local shop for local people' where people suckle piglets.
Mispricing risk because of political dogma is pure pig philosophy. It is against someone's human rights to be penalised merely because of a nebulous political bias?
Taking 'equality' as the highest idea of the mind requires very real human sacrifice. Pig philosophy leads to pig society.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:PERVERSITY KNOWS NO BOUNDARIES
We are all familiar with Westminster's prime perversity: it is the elevation to near-absolute power of Thatcher, Major, Blair, Brown, Cameron, lumbering us with their bizarre projects. Post-Lisbon, the absolute perversity of EU governance is coming home: beer bottles and bananas were just hors d'oeuvres - now the full Monty (Python) is upon us.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 1st Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Don't think there isn't going to be a payback. Iceland are doing the correct thing - shaft the banks and tell the IMF EU globalists to go to Hell.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 1st Mar 2011, brossen99 wrote:Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 1st Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Saudi Arabia sends tanks to Bahrain:-
Welcome back Emily
I missed the hair battles
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:IT DOESN'T MAKE ME PHYSICALLY SICK BUT:
The posturing of successive Westminster Warlords regarding LEGAL SLAUGHTER (done by us) and ILLEGAL SLAUGHTER (done by Johnnie Despot) does my 'ed in, trying to understand the mentality of our Righteous Ones. In ordinary life, we shrink away from those who want to hang, draw and quarter this or that kind of miscreant. Is it PUBLIC SCHOOL that does the damage, or just the 'natural selection' of the party committees, who screen for Westminster excellence?
I might almost wish I could be as fatuous as Delicate Dave, and claim I feel PHYSICALLY SICK. But were I to do so, it would not be over Gaddafi and his killing from the air, but our succession of pathetic needy child-PMs, let loose on the world by the Westminster Malaise, WHO WILL 'LEGALLY' KILL UNTOLD NUMBERS OF COLLATERAL CIVILIANS WITH TRUE, BRITISH APLOMB and sleep the sleep of the just.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 1st Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:6
maybe we should have a 'day of rage' and see how violently they suppress it?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:MIGHT WE BE MISSING THE OBVIOUS - ICELAND IS SMALL (#7)
Small is beautiful - it permits embraceable identity.
I saw Cameron boasting about our 'defence budget' (4th in the world?).
We have this barmy, 'colonial' hang-over of world influence (a joke when you consider our incompetence at home) that fires up megalomaniac Westminster Warriors (and mercenaries doing the job they love).
While Westminster endures, so will Dominator Dave and his ilk.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 1st Mar 2011, indignantindegene wrote:#5 jc wrote:
鈥淭aking 'equality' as the highest idea of the mind requires very real human sacrifice鈥
It certainly does. The pursuit of 鈥楨quality鈥 means that we should immediately abandon all forms of PRIVILEDGE for certain groups of people 鈥 from 鈥楻ight Honourable鈥 MPs and 鈥楴oble鈥 titled Lords and Baronesses, up to Royal Highnesses and all on the Civil List.
I鈥檓 prepared to give up my claim to special seats on buses and trains for the elderly as this is age discrimination, and I will not support the 2012 London Olympics as it encourages and rewards those who are specially selected on the grounds of inequality.
I am also banning my wife from driving as she gets a lower premium than me whilst being responsible for regularly modifying the front and rear ends of my cars.
Equality my Rs
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:LET'S HOPE THE TANKS ARE BRITISH MADE WITH DISCRIMINATORY WEAPONS (#9)
After all: not a lot of sense in killing good people to stop bad people killing good people.
Mind you, it's good advertising, and that brings jobs for decent British arms workers in a peaceful democracy . . .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:ROFL ROFL ROFL (#13)
You have put flesh on my Monty Python bones IDG2!
Equality my farce.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:PRESENT IMPERFECT
Our past behaviour was mostly in ignorance. Gunboat diplomacy and use of Johnnie Foreigner for target practice, and arms demonstration is, today, inexcusable - indeed, diabolical.
Were I a cynic, I might almost see inspection of our past as a way to avoid scrutiny of present disgrace. You would not be party to that, would you NewsyNighty?
By the same token: let's stop discussing effects on insurance, of the latest Lisbon Legacy, and INVESTIGATE WHICH EU NUTTER SAW FIT TO IMPLEMENT IT, AND WHY.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 1st Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:"You can't make this up: basically the world financial mafia says Mark to Myth when prices are low, and Mark to Market (on selected assets) when prices surge to a record."
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 1st Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:16
it'll be interesting to see what JP makes of the Empire in his series? Will it be Cromwellian warts and all or a knighthood application?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:BRILLIANT JEREMY PAXMAN (Guardian) (#18)
Hmmmm. So was Parkinson - allegedly. And Tony Blair was a 'good communicator' OF WHAT? And Barack Obama was a god - for a while. And Gaddafi is a deranged devil. And Dubya Bush wore a white hat. OR AM I GETTING THEM ALL MIXED UP?
Power, celebrity, adulation, charisma, and APPEARANCE ON A SCREEN NEAR YOU, all bamboozle The Ape Confused by Language.
Look again. Read transcripts. Hold up a metaphorical crucifix. Then they ALL look a lot different.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 1st Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:The more I listen to Birgitta Jonsdottir the more I like her - a poet doing politics and shafting the globalists with quiet elegance. I hope you find a way to get to the criminals who messed up your country and bring them to justice.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 1st Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:Jo Caulfield, first 10 mins is an hilarious take on the banking crisis:
/programmes/b00p2hg0
Equal does not mean fair. Due to natural inequalities, fair is usually unequal. But, 'equal' is objective, measurable, understandable in numeric form, and we feel comfortable with that. Fair is subjective and we have lost confidence in the values that once allowed us to make fair, subjective, decisions.
About time: /programmes/b00z6zc7. Perhaps one of these days the UKGP will be able to take on board the fact that natural selection is but one element of evolution and that sexual selection is the link between culture and evolution - scary thought for postmodernists and creationists alike, but true if you think about it - most people still live in 'breeding groups' i.e. with taboos on who they marry.
Ape confused by language? We have entered an age in which language and symbolism are used with very different aptitudes by different groups. Are we plain speaking or do we have a hidden agenda that allows us to outcompete our colleagues? Is honesty the best policy or does deception bring reward? Do we communicate or do we convey information? Does information have a price tag? Was the Iraq war illegal or do we just wish our legislature had found it so? Is emotion a better communicator than reason? and so on...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 1st Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:20 I looked up the (earlier) clip - a very impressive lady. Why am I constantly amazed by the clarity of thought that comes out of the mouths of Nordics? Is it the cold climate that focuses their minds on reason and away from emotionalism and sensationalism?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 1st Mar 2011, Alex_Bermondsey wrote:There is a basic misunderstanding of the ruling (which stems from a 7 year-old directive) because of the dumbed-down, Daily-Mail-ised version that is being reported. There is also a lack of discussion about its meaning for equality in general. If you're interested read the full article here:
Thanks.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 1st Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:23
statistics of risk are based on FACTS OF EVENTS. To misprice the mathematics of risk for a deviant false belief is outside the world of reason. It is lala land. Equality is a false god that leads to a pig society. It is a society that says there is no good and so ends up having very little in it.
if women are a lesser risk why penalise them for a numbskull set of false beliefs? It is unjust irrational prejudice. It only appeals to flat earth mindsets trapped in the world of belief which as we know is different from the world of knowledge.
only equal things are equal. unlike things are not equal. it is unjust and monty python to suggest they are. Equality cannot be gerrymandered because it is a measurable property of a subject.
1 foot and 1 metre are not equal except in the narrow sense of class of measurements. yet here we as if there are people enforcing by law that 1 foot and 1 metre are equal and interchangeable and it is wrong to discriminate between them because 'discrimination' is 'bad' and 'offensive'.
can people who pervert mathematics and mix up properties be said to have reason or wisdom?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 1st Mar 2011, kevseywevsey wrote:International aid is a racket and a job creation scheme for well meaning backpackers who don't want to go home or grow up and get a real job. Stop it...stop it now or I'll get very angry...you wont like me if I get angry.
And as for the excuse to continue aid to ensure we stay safe in the UK. Can I suggest a better border control/repatriation programme.
Dave Camaron has me worried. Pushing for a no fly zone has shades of the early Blair years. To Quote Barrie:
We have another one.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 1st Mar 2011, jr4412 wrote:Sarah McDermott.
"Niall Ferguson"
sophist, ghastly.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 1st Mar 2011, jmcl19 wrote:What a joke of an interview by Emily just now with Niall Ferguson... and the other chap who didn't get a word in because Niall kept rudely interrupting him and Emily continually directed questions at Niall. Pretty obviously just a plugging for his book and not much of an exploration of the west's role in the Arab world.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 1st Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:EMILIE HAS JOINED THE MADDING CROWD.
The final discussion: all taking at once - the guy with the book dominating, and the guy on his second language cut off and talked over by Emilie. 'Thank you for coming in' - indeed!
I can only assume that is 'edgy'.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 1st Mar 2011, kevseywevsey wrote:Alex23 wrote:
"because of the dumbed-down, Daily-Mail-ised version that is being reported..."
There is another version in the Guardian-asty, its a long-winded
sanctimonious one.
I think what Ferguson was trying to say was:
Islam is a throw back culture.
He wouldn't be wrong. The Europeans embraced the science revolution from the 16 century onwards, leaving Christianity a quaint religion but recognised as the bedrock of European values of today. Religion is and has always been used as a way of controlling the masses. The Imams were successful in holding on to their power and extending the life of their religion in the minds of their congregation..the priests weren't so successful...their congregation moved on to other things non-supernatural...things like books and knowledge and stuff.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 2nd Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:This is part of the sickness that no one in 'authority' is facing up to :-
And renders any financial debate meaningless unless it is engaged before anything else.
Now after I heard a trusted up peacock repeat 'I' three times and spied Naill I'd had enough and switched off. Same peacocks same stuff . I'm more interested in flight attendants and poets who now run Iceland with a linear checklist structure and no class/title importance hierarchy .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 2nd Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Islam forbids financial usury The West is based on it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 2nd Mar 2011, Rickap wrote:Perhaps if Emily Maitlis had only wanted a contribution from Niall Ferguson, she should have interviewed him in a sole capacity. It really is unfair to invite two guests and not to have a semblance of equality!
This is not what Newsnight is about - Niall Ferguson is not an unbiased contributor!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 2nd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:"Europeans embraced the science revolution from the 16 century onwards, leaving Christianity a quaint religion but recognised as the bedrock of European values of today....their congregation moved on to other things non-supernatural...things like books and knowledge and stuff."
That, I agree with.
Specifically, Protestantism evolved from ritual to rationale. That is the way religion should and will develop. But multiculturalism has set us back centuries because we have ignored the true significance of our own culture. We measure church attendance but we fail to observe non-numeric elements of culture.
This is the previously typical British format for commercial exchange, say in a shop:
1. Hello - establish contact person to person
2. Please may I have - initiate trade with cordiality
3. Thankyou - complete trade wih gratitude
4. Goodbye - reaffirm recognition of humanity that trade is set within.
That is Christianity working as a backgound to trade. Who cares about that now? Now we have to defer to cultures that wail and gnash whilst also agrresivley seeking trade via telesales and other intrusions with no respect for the humanity of who they are trying to make money out of.
Usury is not the only problem. Sweeteners, deals, and people who simply won't get off the phone are equally problematic for Protestants.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 2nd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:I recently inherited a book that contains a photo of the suffragette who threw herself under a race horse - the photo being of the moment it happened with both the woman and the horse lying on the ground. A chilling reminder of how Britain modernised.
I contributed to this modenisation process by carrying placards in the 1980s that said 'Yes means Yes, No means No. However we dress, wherever we go.' There is an ideology behind that slogan.
Isn't it time that we had the debate about what effect female head-covering is having on our culture? What is the purpose and ideology of this practice? Is it akin to turban wearing? Is it akin to nuns' habits? What impact is it having on modern western societies?
Specifically what is the impact of female head-covering in the workplace? What is the impact on men, and what is the impact of the impact on men, on women who do expose their hair in the same workplace?
These are quite valid political questions that we are ignoring to our shame and disrespect for our own history and devlopment as a culture.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:B&Q it Yes I Do forget what I went in There for
Jo Caulfield on Banks Spot On
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Dr Alice in Wonderfull are we still Evolving or Revolting .. Yes
I am an old Prune who needs Pruning, I don't have Gout
NN last niall Yawn Fell Asleep
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 2nd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:35 'how come you can't get a decent bagel round here anymore' !!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 2nd Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:To Gigi Ibrahim's - do you see whats happening? and why the people who will run Egypt and the other Arab countries in vulnerable flux need to bone up on sophisticated financial methods, because that's what its about for the very powerful forces who will manipulate you to their ends.
Don't fall into the believe that the people who helped you to demonstrate effectively are your friends. Affinity is the first step to effective fraud in a hierarchical social structure.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 2nd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:Now that democratisation, as a process, is on the agenda - whether countries democratise in the same way or not - isn't it time that we acknowledge that westernisation is a modernisation process? Isn't it just sour grapes to keep bashing the west? can we truly say that over the past 2000 years western civilisation has been more a force for evil than a force for good or that the west has been more aggressive than other civilisations?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 2nd Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:Most know wareing hats and caps for men in times gone by was very common but did you know women waring simple cloth shalls over their heads was also common, watch closely. We now place a different contex reason to this with regards women .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 2nd Mar 2011, ecolizzy wrote:#40 but did you know women waring simple cloth shalls over their heads was also common, watch closely. We now place a different contex reason to this with regards women
Dead right flicks I used to always wear a scarf or even a shawl in the '60s and '70s it was very fashionable, either tied on the tip of your chin, or wrapped around you hippy style.
I wouldn't dream of wearing one now, too many connatations. I don't even see many catholic women wearing them to church these days either.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 2nd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:Pakistan - Minister for Minorities - the only christian in the cabinet - shot dead.
And we have just increased Aid to Pakistan.
Are we more suicidal than Islamists who at least only destroy themselves on an individual basis rather than as an entire culture.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 2nd Mar 2011, Mistress76uk wrote:Disgusting
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)
Comment number 44.
At 2nd Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:COUNTERFEIT INTEGRITY IN THE AGE OF PERVERSITY (#30)
As my jaw slowly drops, I am proving to myself, beyond doubt, that Political Parties are unregulated in this counterfeit democracy. Our counterfeit governance, has seen to it that Political Parties are neither regulated by Westminster nor by statute.
In the news today, we have OFCOM fussing, ineffectually, about the lies of broadband suppliers. But THERE IS NO OFPOL! What is more, Political Parties DO NOT EXIST in any formalised way, that permits CONFRONTATION, or CALLING TO ACCOUNT. They do not operate under Britain鈥檚 trumpeted RULE OF LAW.
What a farce! Westminster is OUT OF CONTROL.
In the 2010 General Election, the Conservative Party widely issued a flyer (variously modified) carrying the blatant lie: "THE CONSERVATIVES MUST WIN HERE TO STOP ANOTHER 5 YEARS OF GORDON BROWN". In fact, is is a double lie, as no one could guarantee Brown's return under any or all circumstances, and the use of 'HERE' stands out starkly, as undue influence on the recipient locality.
Challenge to the Conservative Party goes unanswered. There is no OFPOL (Office of Politics). The ASA are prohibited from action (though they sent all parties a sad pre-election plea for integrity) and the Electoral Commission is subtitled 'NOT ME GUV'.
THERE is the shining British example to the world - atop which Dave commands the terrible Gaddafi: 'IN THE NAME OF BRITISH INTEGRITY GO, AND GO NOW!'
If only - IF ONLY - NewsyNighty could spot REAL edgy when it is under their nose.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 44)
Comment number 45.
At 2nd Mar 2011, flicks3 wrote:'Anybody who cant understand the deal here's the way it works'
Complain about this comment (Comment number 45)
Comment number 46.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:37 Don't Mention Bacon Buttys you maybe Shot
Complain about this comment (Comment number 46)
Comment number 47.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:45 The Real Deal There .. Don't Tell Everybody .. They will Wake Up
What's That Hitting The Fan
Complain about this comment (Comment number 47)
Comment number 48.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:43 You Lot Have Imported/Imorted That In2 This Country
Look on The Bright Side, They could/would get Rid of our wonderfull politicians
Where's me Burka KA KA KA KA
Complain about this comment (Comment number 48)
Comment number 49.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:Is The grate golden brown Cunnin Plan Still Going
You NO the one where he/it Half Hinches 20 Billion Acker's A Year out of everybodys Pension Plans
Don't Mention The kinnocks, you'l get Knocked
Read browns Toilet Paper Backed Pension Plans in all good bookshops near you
Complain about this comment (Comment number 49)
Comment number 50.
At 2nd Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:foreign aid
as run by the current pig philosophy will have little good.
Niall Ferguson
'science came late to the muslim world' ? hahaha. westocentric claptrap.
don't think i will read his 'book'.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 50)
Comment number 51.
At 2nd Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:MOHAMMED CAME LATE TO THE WORLD OF ARAB SCIENCE? (#50)
In pre-history and early history, a lot of maths, science and astronomy was, manifestly, understood but later lost or suppressed - especially by religious power seekers.
I suppose Ferguson might have been technically correct, if the Muslims eschewed the earlier Arab knowledge?
In passing: Dave is doing PMQs. He really is a Bullingdon bully - and rather nasty when not winning, isn't he.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 51)
Comment number 52.
At 2nd Mar 2011, RolDeed wrote:They Shoot Horses Dont They .. Yes .. and Christian Dogs Cats etc
InFact They Shoot Anything They Dont Understand
Send Them A BannedAid
Don't send them Doctors, I have Seen Them Shoot Them, Them Them's should Be Shot
Which Thems .. Them Thems .. Them Thems are Very Stupid Thems
Cyrstill Clear as mud .. Are You A Them? .. Now and them, but dont tell them, Them might try and Shoot me .. again
Complain about this comment (Comment number 52)
Comment number 53.
At 2nd Mar 2011, stevie wrote:that Ferguson guy just talks over everyone else and Emily wasn't strong enough for him so rather than watch a Ferguson rant....I switched channels
Complain about this comment (Comment number 53)
Comment number 54.
At 2nd Mar 2011, Byzant wrote:In a 6 minute film, Allan Little gave an overview of the UK's role in the Middle East since WW1. It was an excellent piece ... except in one respect: the name of Israel did not come up once! No mention of the Balfour Declaration, the Suez invasion of 1956 but without mention of the collusion between Britain, France and Israel, no mention that when Britain exited from Palestine in 1948, it was essentially handed over to the Jewish minority at the expense of the native Palestinians. Yet these links are a prime factor in the distrust with which the UK is held in the Middle East, and the ongoing Palestinian calvary since 1948 the cause of most of the problems haunting the region even now.
Quite a performance. Now I am sure that neither Mr Litlle nor Sue Onslow, the expert from the LSE he interviewed, could have done this, it must be the subeditors of the film who excised Israel from the final cut. Does the 大象传媒 have a policy of deliberately protecting Israel from any adverse mention? It often seems so.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 54)
Comment number 55.
At 2nd Mar 2011, jauntycyclist wrote:51
there is a catholic line of propaganda about how 'backward' islam is. they have pumped out several books on the issue.
europe was in 'the dark ages' while the sciences flourished under islam. the universities were created by the church fathers to prevent the public from getting access to science [heresy] coming out of arabia
from 4.35 into the vid
if one took all the muslims out of the nhs would it still function?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 55)
Comment number 56.
At 2nd Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:MEASURED AND THOUGHT-PROVOKING - BRAVO (#54)
I have pointed out before, that megalomaniac leaders always want to rule the (known) world. The same mind-set, leads to massive extermination programmes - COMMENSURATE WITH THE TECHNOLOGY OF THE TIMES. If we remain calm and focused (as the admirable Byzant) it is crystal clear that Hitler was the FIRST INDUSTRIAL TYRANT/EXTERMINATOR. That came as a shock.
YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET! (I use American advisedly.)
So: a rational response to the extermination of Jews, by Hitler, would be sadness and horror BUT NOT MIND-BENDING GUILT. That is irrational, and its genesis deserves enquiry. It is our guilt that has exacerbated the original, 'Biblical' error. There never was a 'Land Without a People'. The milk is always sour and the honey - bitter.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 56)
Comment number 57.
At 3rd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:Why don't we all go back to where we were before the Romans shook us up.
"europe was in 'the dark ages' while the sciences flourished under islam."
yes we know that. but the flourishing was founded on greek science, ancient sumerian knowledge (the holy grail that the templars took back to europe), and chinese inventions picked up from the silk route. but you're right, the age of european naval expansion and colonisation could not have taken place without that vital role that arabs and normans played in the evolution of science in the west.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 57)
Comment number 58.
At 3rd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:"if one took all the muslims out of the nhs would it still function?"
why ask the question?
would the nhs function if you took out the atheists, humanists, jews, christians, pagans, animists?
why ask the question?
we are one people working for the betterment of all. we leave religious differences at home when we go to work.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 58)
Comment number 59.
At 3rd Mar 2011, wappaho wrote:supposing i have four children who want to make me a birthday card. supposing the first child cuts out the card and then goes off to do something else. the second child does a drawing that the third child embellishes and the fourth child writes a witty inscription inspired by the drawing, and then the first child comes back and sprinkles glitter on the card. who do i thank for the card?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 59)
Comment number 60.
At 3rd Mar 2011, barriesingleton wrote:EASY (#59)
You cut it in four, randomly assign the pieces, and and say one word to each child: THANKS FOR THE CARD.
Please move on - I have a baby to cut in half . . .
Complain about this comment (Comment number 60)
Comment number 61.
At 3rd Mar 2011, Abu Saajid wrote:RE. kevseywevsey wrote:kevseywevsey (11:56pm on 01 Mar 2011).
It is true that, by & large, the Muslim world has regressed to the Dark Ages scientifically & technologically whilst the West embraced the Enlightenment. But look back further & you shall find, inspired by Islam, Muslims were responsible for the preservation of ancient knowledge such as that of the Greeks but the Muslim world was pre-eminent in science whilst Western Europe was mired in its own Dark Age. For an academic Mr Ferguson came across as extremely blinkered if not quite ignorant of his own field of study.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 61)