Is public money being used to support mayor's re-election campaign?
It is reported that Boris Johnson is planning to put another £81 million into his London . But is the project, launched amid great fanfare last week, also part of a big effort to promote Johnson himself? Is public money, and millions more in sponsorship from , being used to support the mayor's re-election campaign?
OK, it was inevitable that the bicycles would be called Boris Bikes (though it was actually Ken Livingstone who first proposed the idea).You can't stop the media seizing on obvious alliteration (and Ken's Bikes doesn't work so well anyway).
But this week (TFL) have sent out free T-shirts to the first 1,000 Londoners to sign up to the scheme. On the front of the shirt is a picture of the bikes, the scheme logo and the heading 'Barclays Cycle Hire'.
Fair enough.
But the back of the T-shirt simply shows a cartoon of a cyclist who is obviously Boris Johnson - with unkempt blond hair, dark suit, flapping tie etc.
Indeed I know the cartoon is Boris Johnson because
Perhaps 1,000 free T-shirts won't make much difference to Boris Johnson's election effort, and I can't imagine many people will actually wear them in public.
But TFL ought to be careful how they use the Johnson cartoon in future, and how they involve him in such ventures. They not only run the risk of falling foul of our strict laws on election spending, but also those which ban government bodies from using public funds to promote individual politicians.
Comment number 1.
At 6th Aug 2010, LtWratting wrote:I know it's rude to be ungrateful for my unexpected 'Boris on a bike' gift, but the t-shirts are very poor quality. It will probably make a useful duster.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 6th Aug 2010, barriesingleton wrote:USING PUBLIC FUNDS TO FINANCE A FACTION - WHATEVER NEXT?
You will be telling me that, in Britain, on calling a referendum, THE GOVERNMENT CAN TAKE A (fully funded) SIDE IN IT.
Surely not. That would hardly be the democratic way - would it?
Anyway - Westminster has been purged of sleaze and sleazeballs. It is now a place of honour, integrity and whiter-than-white representation of the powerless and down-trodden. Ask any MP.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 6th Aug 2010, cakea wrote:'Illiteration' - how wonderfully appropriate for a spelling error.
Back to school, Crick!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 6th Aug 2010, David Allardice wrote:Yes, I was very disappointed in my free T-shirt. Even my already low expectations were not met. I might wear it around the house when I'm cleaning. I have no wish to promote Boris in any way, shape or form.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 6th Aug 2010, stevie wrote:never has London needed Ken Livingstone more than it does now....bugger Boris...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 6th Aug 2010, Phillip wrote:What is the issue? By the very nature every time a government or council spends money it helps re-elect the incumbent!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 7th Aug 2010, MaxWax wrote:Cheap t-shirts: it does sum up the Boris tenure of London Government.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 3rd Oct 2010, Gaz wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)