´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

The shift from Taliban-controlled media

Post categories: ,Ìý

Rajan Datar | 09:51 UK time, Wednesday, 26 August 2009

Fascinating times. As the Afghanistan election results slowly creep out this week, one bright note that came out of last week's tense pre-election build up was how vibrant the media in Afghanistan is at the moment - and how engaged ordinary Afghans are by more open coverage.

rajan_shadow_2_300.jpgFreedom of the press is enshrined in the constitution although that didn't prevent the current leadership exhorting journalists to avoid reporting violence on the day of the election for fear of deterring potential voters. So not perfect, sure, but talking to the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s Lyse Doucet and her Afghan collegue Schweib Sharafi in Kabul for Over To You, I was struck by how positive they were about the enthusiasm and commitment of young people relatively new to the media scene there.

With dozens of independent newspapers and broadcasters covering the polls, it makes for a welcome contrast from when the Taliban tightly controlled media output. Although one caveat about developments today - do we really want an Americanisation of political coverage whereby one leading candidate is advised by James Carville, former adviser to President Clinton, before the televised Presidential debate a few weeks ago ?

And also interesting to learn how the Taliban are very conscious of the influence of international and domestic media on ordinary people's views and in their own way try and shape the agenda too. They are very aware for instance about the wavering support in country's like the UK for the continued presence of "Our Boys" in war torn areas like the Helmand region, as the death toll rises.

I suppose, from my perspective, the more the media can give a direct voice to whats actually happening not just in the corridors of power but in marketplaces and on street corners in countries like Afghanistan - as much as they would say, from the shopping centres of London and Manchester - the better. There's a parallel to be found in cinematic depictions of situations outside the West. I saw a new American movie called "The Hurt Locker" last week - a relentless and unflinching portrait of the life of a bomb disposal squad in Baghdad. What struck me about the movie was how yet again, citizens of the host country were mostly portrayed as either victims, onlookers or perpetrators of ongoing violence. I yearn for more portrayals in big budget features of everyday lives and concerns outside the prism of conflict - even in a war film!

In this week's programme we develop the theme of the ever-changing relationship between audience and broadcasters, with news of new platforms being given to villagers in rural North Nigeria via modern mobile phones. The aim is to provide user generated content for the Hausa service first and then the World Service at large on stories and issues that wouldn't normally be covered. We look at how Europe Today has been introducing guest editorships to individual listeners and how a new series, provocatively titled "Why is Africa so poor?" attempts to avoid wheeling out views of analysts and aid agencies from the outside and instead tries to gauges perspectives from ordinary Africans themselves. Ambitious project, mind you....

So what do you think? Is the World Service moving in the right direction - is it broadening its contributor pool enough? Which voices would you like to hear more of? Or is there a danger of the professional, seasoned reporter's analysis being obscured by this mission drive to be more inclusive? Let us know...

Rajan Datar is Presenter, Over To You.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    A salute to the ´óÏó´«Ã½ for your work providing villagers in rural North Nigeria access to media by mobile phones. I can't wait to see the content they provide to you. This indeed changes the future...getting news from ordinary citizens, versus it being filtered by analysts and agencies.

    You asked if your voice might be obscured. I don't think that's the case at all, as you will now have information to voice from a more robust source, and provide your analysis. You will also know the information comes straight from the source.

    Your work for freedom of information is to be commended. Keep up the great work!

  • Comment number 2.

    No, you are not moving in the right direction which should be towards greater truth and honesty in areas where those virtues are usually suppressed. On that count, for some years you have been moving in the opposite direction. You are perceived as betraying the principles of public service on which the ´óÏó´«Ã½ was founded and of which I, as an Englishman, was so proud. As an example, I cite your unremitting efforts to suppress your internal Balen Report which in 2004 examined your coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. You fought all the way up to the House of Lords, where in February this year you lost, against an attempt under the Freedom of Information Act to require you to make the Report public. You are still fighting to suppress the information on a second ground of appeal, which I understand will be heard in the High Court. On political matters, you are no longer trusted to be objective.

    Your cookery recipes are not bad though.

  • Comment number 3.

    Yes, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ is moving to a more open and broader spectrum of views- and perforce this stimulates reporters and editors. Since the ´óÏó´«Ã½ also has goals of education and democratization,it will also be necessary for overviews of the diverse input, such overviews to be supplied by news professionals.

    (I cannot agree with mean-spirited partisans who criticize the "honesty" of the ´óÏó´«Ã½. Note that such individuals always speak from a strong partisan position. The ´óÏó´«Ã½ has a great and long world-wide reputation.)

  • Comment number 4.

    I live in Africa and depend very much on you for world news. I admire your work though I feel your endless hyping of upcoming programmes is really supermarket-level advertising. The one real criticism I have, though, is that your African-presented programmes are excruciatingly bad.

  • Comment number 5.

    I feel that the ´óÏó´«Ã½ is definitely at the forefront of the journalistic approach to New Media.

    I don't feel that seasoned journalists and bloggers are in competition whatsoever. A good system would cause their respective best efforts to augment each other. For example, the bloggers' advantages are our broad reach, sheer number, unofficial capacity and diversity of thought, while the professional journalists' advantages are your resources, training, focused reach, official capacity and specialized skill.

    The relationship is similar to that of a pair of artist and technician ... greater than the sum of the two parts.

Ìý

More from this blog...

Latest contributors

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.