´óÏó´«Ã½

Exciting news just in...

Comments

1. At 04:08 PM on 31 May 2007, Anne P. wrote:

   What? direct to me personally? Eddie, I'm more touched than I can say.

2. At 04:17 PM on 31 May 2007, wrote:

   Don't get me wrong I think blogging is one of the best of the "new" uses of the internet the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are pushing, but is it possible our host has become addicted and can't resist posting?

3. At 04:19 PM on 31 May 2007, Aunt Dahlia wrote:

   Why is that exciting? Is there some ruinous relationship twixt Peter and Rupert of which we know naught? Tell all... or make something up....

4. At 04:20 PM on 31 May 2007, Gillian wrote:

   Gosh, I'm so excited....I'm almost mesmerised!

5. At 04:20 PM on 31 May 2007, admin annie wrote:

   I see it's so exciting you posted it an hour ago and it has passed without comment.

6. At 04:28 PM on 31 May 2007, wrote:

   Excellent! I had a fiver on him in the sweepstakes!

7. At 05:30 PM on 31 May 2007, wrote:

   Personally I would have been content with him reading it to me.

   But if he really wants to provide such personal service, the least I can do is put the kettle on...

   Good old ´óÏó´«Ã½.

   Fifi

8. At 07:22 PM on 31 May 2007, wrote:

   good man that Peter D..i take back all jonnie said about him....

   ....kettle is on...2 sugars?...

9. At 08:02 PM on 31 May 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

   Sorry -- this has nothing to do with anything, I'm just trying to find out whether I have been barred for ever from the blog, or whether the two posts I have tried to send in the past two hours (and been told were held for approval) have vanished for ever or may appear in the end.

   There's no point in asking whether anyone else is having this trouble, because they wouldn't be able to say if they were!

   If this post doesn't arrive, can somebody let me know...

10. At 08:46 PM on 31 May 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    re me being sad and baffled @9

    Thank you, Blog Prince!

    :-)

    Everyone else: never mind, my personal crisis is now past. Just ignore me. That's usually the most sensible thing to do anyway.

11. At 09:03 PM on 31 May 2007, wrote:

    Chris Ghoti...loud 'n clear me ol' mate....loud 'n clear......over.....

    .....oh its the ball bearing factory again tonight.....chis' i 'ope its dark when we goes feet wet....over.....

12. At 09:30 PM on 31 May 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    I'm not having that problem Mr Fish. But I would endeavour to give you a sign if I were.

13. At 11:26 PM on 31 May 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    Aperitif @12

    I think I already have a sign: Pisces.

    Thanks to you and DIW for the reassurance. Marc or whoever goes through looking for malice let my posts through about two minutes after I went all pathetic, but it is still good to know that somebody cares.

    There is something so futile about a fish crying, isn't there. And underwater there’s not a lot of point in setting out to thcweam and thcweam until I’m thick, either.

    (And now it says I am malicious again. Honestly, I don’t know, some people!)

14. At 10:56 AM on 01 Jun 2007, Aperitif wrote:

    Fishy Chris (13) :-)