´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

The Glass Box for Friday

Post categories:

Eddie Mair | 16:03 UK time, Friday, 7 December 2007

In the PM office we meet every night after the programme in this Glass Box:

glassboxd.JPG

We talk about the content of the programme and try to give an honest assessment of what worked and what didn't...the things we missed and the places where our ambitions were not met. THIS virtual glass box you are looking at is where you are invited - indeed encouraged - to be honest about our hour. Members of the production team will read it, and the editor should comment too. Click on The Glass Box link on the right of the page to read previous entries.

Comments

  1. At 04:15 PM on 07 Dec 2007, wrote:

    Do we have to have the same chair every night? Cannot we have a different one (nearer the tables for our quadlattes) sometimes?

  2. At 05:00 PM on 07 Dec 2007, Angie Brown wrote:

    I hope you can get hold of someone tonight to discuss the implications of the dairy produce price-fixing by the supermarkets.

    In particular, I would like to ask whoever would be appropriate whether the fines imposed will be paid back to dairy farmers in subsidies!!

    As an average member of the public, I personally have adjusted to buying dairy products (from the supermarkets) at the current prices, and rather than pay 1p less for a pint of milk, I would far prefer to think that our dairy farmers were seeing a better return for their efforts!

  3. At 05:48 PM on 07 Dec 2007, Pete wrote:

    When Mugabe finally leaves this world Zimbabwe will need enormous sums of aid to get it back on track. At that point the French, Spanish and Portuguese will be no where to be seen. The burden will fall to the evil imperialist Brits as usual.

  4. At 06:24 PM on 07 Dec 2007, Mike Hubbard wrote:

    Just listened to the news item about the death of
    the 'composer' Stockhausen and listened to his
    works in the background - innovative? What a load of rubbish, two cats in a dustbin couldn't make a more discordant row. All this in the name of progressive music art! Have the select few taken leave of their senses? I hope that nobody paid to hear it.

  5. At 07:16 PM on 07 Dec 2007, wrote:

    Re; Mike Hubbard (SB4)

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Did you ever see the deaf lady (Mrs Richards)

    There is a bit somewhere where she says 'What Rubbish'

    Anyway ........ I tend to agree with you Mike.

  6. At 06:19 AM on 08 Dec 2007, The Stainless Steel Cat wrote:

    Mike (4):

    I agree. His stuff was a lot better once he'd teamed up with Pete Waterman though.

  7. At 07:57 AM on 08 Dec 2007, eddie mair wrote:

    Deepthought (1) - new photo on Monday!

  8. At 11:01 AM on 08 Dec 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    Somebody I know has a sig. that reads 'Stockhausen is fine so long as you don't step in it.'

    I don't know how fair that is because I don't remember any that I have listened to; I know I must have heard some, but it doesn't seem to have been memorable.

  9. At 11:48 AM on 08 Dec 2007, Dr Hackenbush wrote:

    Well done - Tuesday’s newsletter got to me earlier today.

  10. At 12:00 PM on 08 Dec 2007, B Williams wrote:

    I was disappointed with the coverage of the story about the lady who left most of her £10 million fortune to the owners of "her favourite chinese takeaway". I would have expected this headline from a tabloid newpaper - not Radio 4. It turned out to be irrelevant that the recipients of the fortune owned the local chinese takeaway and much more important that they were very close family friends. Please leave this sort of silly misleading headline to the tabloids.

  11. At 12:04 PM on 08 Dec 2007, B Williams wrote:

    I was disappointed with the coverage of the story about the lady who left most of her £10 million fortune to the owners of "her favourite chinese takeaway". I would have expected this headline from a tabloid newpaper - not Radio 4. It turned out to be irrelevant that the recipients of the fortune owned the local chinese takeaway and much more important that they were very close family friends. Please leave this sort of silly misleading headline to the tabloids.

  12. At 12:12 PM on 08 Dec 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    Somebody I know has a sig. that reads 'Stockhausen is fine so long as you don't step in it.'

    I don't know how fair that is because I don't remember any that I have listened to; I know I must have heard some, but it doesn't seem to have been memorable.

  13. At 12:51 PM on 08 Dec 2007, wrote:

    For once, I was able to listen to the whole broadcast (not being in the office). I think the coverage of the outcome of the Fallon trial was too much, to be honest. Yes, it was worth mentioning, but to push off the piece about three of the largest supermarkets being found guilty of price-fixing to cover a sportsman being found innocent is the wrong decision, I would suggest. The piece about price-fixing affects most of the population of the country. It should really have taken precedence over the racing piece...

  14. At 01:57 PM on 08 Dec 2007, Roger Sawyer wrote:

    Hello All... I was in the chair on Friday. Thanks for all your comments. Another busy day with some interesting stuff around.

    Fearless Fred (13)... I understand your point. I would have liked the milk price fixing story to have got on the main body of the programme... though I don't agree it should have taken precedence over the Fallon story. I think your use of the word 'sportsman' is interesting. If it had been an extremely prominent businessman or politician, would you have had the same objection?

    We had done an interview - a good one - on the price fixing, but there was a timing problem and we went too long on an earlier piece. A programme with a lot of built stuff in it is quite a complex jigsaw, so the price fixing story went. It had been around since early morning and had been covered on the Today programme.

    And B Williams (11)... I don't agree with your comments. The restaurateurs had been clients of Mrs Bechal before becoming friends. And the court heard that she used to regularly have her favourite food delivered to her by the restaurant. I think the headline was fine. And I think we said restaurant, not takeaway.

    All the best

    Rog

  15. At 02:30 PM on 08 Dec 2007, Roger Sawyer wrote:

    Roger Sawyer (16). The word 'takeaway' WAS used - in the 1745 heads.

  16. At 03:08 PM on 08 Dec 2007, Roger Sawyer wrote:

    Roger Sawyer (16). Fair enough. I should have checked, but Im posting from home. All the same... I think the headline is okay in that it was a fairly neat way of encapsulating the story in one line.

  17. At 05:51 PM on 08 Dec 2007, Roger Sawyer wrote:

    Roger Sawyer (16). Fair enough. I should have checked, but Im posting from home. All the same... I think the headline is okay in that it was a fairly neat way of encapsulating the story in one line.

  18. At 10:38 PM on 09 Dec 2007, nikki noodle wrote:

    I can't get through to comment on the week's shows - which were great!

    Will try again.

    n-n

  19. At 09:27 AM on 10 Dec 2007, wrote:

    Why is Roger Sawyer talking to himself, and repeating himself, on this blog? Can't he just talk to himself in the office? Would save a lot of typing ;)

  20. At 12:08 PM on 10 Dec 2007, Chris Ghoti wrote:

    Annasee @19, the really impressive thing is the way Roger replies in comment 15 to the comment in 16 that hasn't yet appeared. That's precognition or something, and the rest of us mere mortals can't manage it. Clever stuff, but only what we expect of the PM team I suppose.

    Roger, you don't happen to feel like letting us know a few of the winners in the afternoon races, do you?

This post is closed to new comments.

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.