´óÏó´«Ã½

´óÏó´«Ã½ BLOGS - The Editors
« Previous | Main | Next »

´óÏó´«Ã½ in the news, Friday

Host Host | 09:08 UK time, Friday, 4 August 2006

Daily Mail: Richard Littlejohn on Middle East coverage - "I use a rough rule of thumb whenever I watch TV coverage of the Middle East. Anyone who pronounces Hezbollah as 'Hiz-bull-arrrgh' and Israeli as 'Izza-ra-ay-lee' is almost certainly telling lies." ()

The Sun: Columnist Fergus Shanahan attacks the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s Middle East coverage for "turning war into showbiz". (no link available)

Comments

It would be more interesting to see what blogs are saying about the ´óÏó´«Ã½ rather than Littlejohn in the Daily Mail.

Such "names" rarely tell us anything original and can be easily found online, but if you point out other, less well known voices, then that would be interesting.

These "names" do seem to have a point though. It is a fine line between trying to be well informed with world events and being sucked into viewing them as no more than a soap opera. Broadcasters walk a dangerous line between entertainment and journalism.

  • 3.
  • At 11:22 AM on 04 Aug 2006,
  • Phil Topping wrote:

Interesting point about the ´óÏó´«Ã½ turning the current Middle East conflict into "showbiz". I not sure abbut the analogy but they have reverted to the clichés we associate with sporting events. Witness the claim made by a reporter on ´óÏó´«Ã½ Breakfast yesterday morning that a "record number" of missiles had fallen.

I wonder how Hezbollah are performing today? Has the record been broken again?

So, I agree with both newspapers. With one reservation for the second quote: The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not alone doing it. All the main Western 24h news networks do the very same thing. I would say that most of the time, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ does try to do some even-handed showbiz", and that's more than I can say for CNN.

  • 5.
  • At 02:18 PM on 04 Aug 2006,
  • Neil wrote:

I have a similar rule of thumb. Any quote coming from a quote in the Daily Mail or the Sun is almost certainly either lies or ridiculously exaggerated.

  • 6.
  • At 12:17 PM on 08 Aug 2006,
  • maria ishtar wrote:

what i would agree with what ´óÏó´«Ã½ is doing is becoming biased by overequalising the casualties/destruction etc on both lebanese and israeli sides.
´óÏó´«Ã½ does NOT have to put the same number of lines covering the horrors on both sides, because, with all my respect to all people affected, the destruction on the lebanese side is much higher, casualties, infrastructure, threats are 100x higher, and the whole lebanon is victim to an unjustifiable invasion. where has the sense of justice gone??

This post is closed to new comments.

More from this blog...

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.