Both sides
- 22 Mar 07, 02:22 PM
Professor Frank Stewart attacked 大象传媒 Arabic in the . He says 大象传媒 Arabic is 鈥渁s anti-western as anything that comes out of the Gulf if not more so.鈥
I wonder in which direction Mr Stewart鈥檚 receiver is pointing. Possibly his agenda interferes with reception. Professor Stewart has written to the 大象传媒 at great length about his views. Recently he wrote a nine page critique of the 大象传媒 Arabic Service鈥檚 coverage of the conflict in Lebanon, claiming among other things that we were anti-Israeli. We were able to respond in great detail showing that his highly selective and misleading account of our coverage was unfair and showed no knowledge of the brave and comprehensive coverage that had in fact been broadcast and which included clear and impartial accounts of Israeli views and experiences during the war. Having failed to substantiate his detailed criticism he now resorts to a generalised attack in the New York Times.
It鈥檚 clear from his original letter to the 大象传媒, that what really upsets him is that the 大象传媒 does not overtly push an American or British government line to the exclusion of other views. He seems to find it hard to understand that an institution can be committed to impartiality and mean it.
In the New York Times he says a 大象传媒 programme in Arabic only focused on views critical of the treatment of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, whereas in fact the presenter consistently put the American view and the programme had a contributor who put the US government鈥檚 argument for imprisoning combatants in this way. 大象传媒 Arabic has also interviewed the commander of the prison complex. So the American view has consistently been represented in our output.
Professor Stewart asserts that 大象传媒 Arabic is sympathetic with dictators and poor governance in the Middle East. However, 大象传媒 Arabic covered Saddam Hussein鈥檚 atrocities when others ignored them and holds leaders to account in a way rarely seen in Arab media. This week we reported the opposition arrests in Egypt and before that we were getting the Egyptian transport minister to answer criticisms of the way he handled the ferry disaster.
Recently we interviewed the deputy president of Sudan about his government鈥檚 behaviour in Darfur. Again, 大象传媒 Arabic covered Darfur long before other media houses picked up the current tragic story. So what is Professor Stewart listening to? I would suggest it is his own desire to see and hear only one side of the story and one view asserted: the one he agrees with.
Jerry Timmins is head of Africa and Middle East, World Service
