´óÏó´«Ã½

´óÏó´«Ã½ BLOGS - Justin Webb's America
« Previous | Main | Next »

Democratic enthusiasm

Justin Webb | 22:52 UK time, Saturday, 19 January 2008

Amid the , surely the most important long-term figure is the turn-out: something around 100,000 did I hear?

How many did they get to vote here in 2004? Nine thousand.

I know the Nevada caucus is more important now than it was then - but the fact is that Democrats are coming to the polls this year, they are up for it. Republicans are not.

It could change of course. Republicans could get enthused somewhere down the road, but at the moment they are not.

Perhaps conservatives feel disoriented when every candidate feels like an insurgent - none has the clear backing of the national party leadership and there is no obvious frontrunner. Whatever the reason, they are lagging behind in the enthusiasm race.

Never mind the winner in Nevada, feel the width of the voting pile...

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌý Post your comment

The Nation stated that Obama still won the most DELEGATES, which, at the end of the day, is what matters, right? So did the Washington Post, who is claiming the AP is going to look into their math.

  • 2.
  • At 01:36 AM on 20 Jan 2008,
  • roger wrote:

Are you a Clinton supporter? Your blog lacks objectivity. That is not surprising though, considering you work for the ´óÏó´«Ã½.

Yeah, that was noticeable in Iowa, too, though nobody paid attention.

  • 4.
  • At 02:07 AM on 20 Jan 2008,
  • John wrote:

The most interesting thing about the New Hampshire primary was the turnout. It has been a traditionally conservative/Republican stronghold. Almost twice as many people voted for the top three Democratic candidates as did for the top three Republicans. McCain won. Big deal. The Republican primary did not draw even a respectable percentage of its own registered Republicans much less any independent voters. In the general election any of the republican candidates would have been trounced, in a red state no less.

  • 5.
  • At 02:51 AM on 20 Jan 2008,
  • Foster wrote:

Well, the Republican caucus was virtually uncontested, right? So it would make sense that their turnout is a lot less. But +360,000 people voted in the Repub. SC primary today, so I'm not sure if I see your point...

  • 6.
  • At 07:21 AM on 20 Jan 2008,
  • Jake wrote:

Obama did win the most delegates...but the point is that Clinton is gaining momentum going into Feb. 5th. The more she wins, the more those 20+ states will see a her as being able to win...and thus she will receive more votes! I really want Clinton to win...but Obama would be good too!

This post is closed to new comments.

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.