Black Thursday for UUP
By rights the Ulster Unionists should have been claiming some credit today for their efforts in encouraging the government to push ahead with its consultation paper on devolving Corporation Tax. The UUP leader Tom Elliott took his place alongside the Secretary of State, the Treasury Minister David Gauke, the First and Deputy First Ministers, the SDLP and Alliance leaders. The UUP Treasurer Mark Cosgrove made an impassioned speech in favour from the floor.
But elsewhere the party was forming what one source referred to as "a circular firing squad". Deputy Leader John McAllister and Lagan Valley MLA Basil McCrea told Stephen Nolan they were relaxed about the prospect of Martin McGuinness becoming First Minister, if that was the voters' verdict. Their colleague David McNarry responded by taking to the airwaves to accuse them of undermining Mr Elliott, who has talked about forming a group with the DUP to stop Mr McGuinness getting the top job. Mr McNarry called for the two moderates to go.
If that wasn't bad enough one newspaper headlined the resignation of the UUP Vice Chair Terry Wright over the Health Minister's decision to pull the plug on the Altnagelvin radiotherapy unit. Another broke the story which has now led to the dismissal of Danny Kennedy's Special Adviser, Brian Crowe, over claims about his private life involving allegations of sexual impropriety...and that he had abused his position as a ministerial adviser.
So when I approached Tom Elliott for an interview on the margins of the Corporation tax launch it was more in sorrow than in anger - what to hit him with first? Other politicians were talking about the UUP leader almost as if he'd suffered a bereavement.
All this as the clock ticked towards the formal dissolution of the Assembly at a minute past midnight and the formal start of the election campaign.
What I have to say for Mr Elliott is he is always unfailingly polite in dealing with tough questions - even though in this instance it was pretty clear he'd been blind-sided by the row on the Nolan show. However it can't be good heading in to a campaign with mixed messages about whether you are heading for opposition or a merged grouping with the DUP, internal squabbles, resignations and lurid headlines. The difference in message between Messrs McCrea and McAllister and Mr McNarry shows that the rift between moderates and traditionalists revealed during the party leadership candidate remains in place.
The UUP will have to pick themselves up, brush themselves down and get on with the campaign. Maybe their best hope is that they did so badly in 2007 that they can't fall any further. Certainly these latest events won't spur any general revival.
Comment number 1.
At 25th Mar 2011, Nevin wrote:Unbelievable, Mark. Have you missed a drugs angle to this 'drugs, sex and rock'n'roll' yarn? :L
Our main Unionist and Nationalist parties are broad 'churches' with conservative, socialist and liberal tendencies, not to mention the occasional whiff of gunsmoke. UCUNF was self-evidently a non-runner.
Let's not forget that our politicians are multifaceted: they carry political, religious, educational, cultural and other baggage - some of it lightly. I don't know much about Methodism but the Catholic and Episcopalian churches concentrate a lot of power in head office unlike the main Presbyterian one. Anyone familiar with Presbyterianism will recognise its proneness to schism. Primus inter pares - first amongst equals - and, well, anyone can think they're a primus. Perhaps there are too many Presbyterians in the UUP. They can be very good at keeping the primus lit. :L
The various yarns incorporate lobbyists and special advisers. Perhaps their roles in our governance process have not got the in-depth scrutiny they deserve. Their influence on a Minister could easily outweigh that of Permanent Secretaries and part members alike. Just think of the potential power of a Minister and SpAd acting in tandem up in one of those little fiefdoms in Stormont.
Sinn Fein must be quietly relieved that the UUP is attracting such media attention. Having recently deselected one of their representatives on Moyle District Council I'm told that they're currently on their third replacement candidate. SF had previously suspended and later dismissed another of their representatives on the same council.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 25th Mar 2011, harryatport wrote:In every happy family there are spats from time to time but they are still a happy family. The UUP are still the Party that has done most for bringing N.Ireland forward,not engaging in the "spin" that other parties do in selling the half truths that are quickly discarded after elections. The last four years including the 150odd days where S/Fein pulled Robinson and the DUP into line have been a lost opportunity in getting real politics moving for the people of N.Ireland. The failures in education, environment, millions wasted on the Maze millions wasted on RPA ,its endless and highlights that the electorate should .finally realise that the paties such as the UUP have the integrity and honesty to achieve politics that are craved for then we will move on.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 25th Mar 2011, UnionistEagle wrote:The Ulster Unionists have a long history of tension, going right back to tension between Carson and Craig. It isn't new. It's just covered more by the media now than ever before as communication has advanced.
Tom Elliott strikes me as a man of integrity and passion. If anyone can unite the party it should be someone with these qualities.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 25th Mar 2011, DisgustedinDERRY wrote:UnionistEagle
The Ulster Unionists have a long history of not giving money to Derry, going right back to decision in in the '60s to locate the University of Ulster in Coleraine for example. It isn't new! It's just covered more by the media now than ever before as communication has advanced.
Tom Elliott strikes me as a man of Orange politics, who has no control over his party. No one it seems can unite the party; definitely not someone with these qualities.
The decision by the Ulster Unionist Party not to build the cancer care unit at Altnagelvin, is an attack on the entire population of the North and Northwest region of Ulster. We are very lucky that we have Martin McGuinness at the helm of the highest office in the Assembly. This unit will go ahead. The Ulster Unionist party will continue to go backwards. Republicans are now top of the pops, and the Ulster Unionist Party can no longer gerrymander our representatives out of public office!!!
harryatport
"the electorate should .finally realise that the paties such as the UUP have the integrity and honesty to achieve politics that are craved for then we will move on
Martin McGuinness has delivered more for the entire population of this state in the last four years, than any other politician in the entire history of partitioned Ireland. He has united most of the political parties, and has driven them to conclude the mandate of the Assembly. The UUP ruled this state with abhorrent disregard for people of certain creed and class. That should never be forgotten; that is why the UUPs representation has and continues to dwindle. The row yesterday by senior party members, live on the radio, highlights the reason why this has happened. They are involved in a struggle between moderates such as John McCallister and Basil McCrea, and dinosaurs such as . The electorate will settle this argument come May; and how we shall all stand up and laugh at the Ulster Unionist Party!!!
Ahhaha!!!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 25th Mar 2011, DisgustedinDERRY wrote:@@
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 25th Mar 2011, DisgustedinDERRY wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 25th Mar 2011, SusieFlood wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 26th Mar 2011, Nevin wrote:MODs and DiD, there seems to be a problem on the "Purdah" thread so I'll also leave this short post here:
I've only had time for a brief glance at recent departmental press releases. Something odd happened on the OFMDFM page yesterday. A press release which was dated 25 March 2011 was there in the afternoon but before nightfall it was gone. It was a link to the imminent arrival of British Summer Time.
Did someone complain? Don't our public servants know that during our present constitutional dispensation it's British, Irish and Others Summer Time? I should imagine that the Others won't be too upset about losing an hour's sleep over such a contentious issue :L
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 26th Mar 2011, Nevin wrote:Mark, you've referred to the consultation paper on Corporation Tax. There's a 13 week consultation period yet for at least 6 weeks Stormont is in purdah and the politically active will be focussing on the elections. The NI Affairs Committee hasn't even completed its report and the British-Irish Council probably hasn't had an input. Scotland probably isn't the only region that is likely to raise a ruction and the EU evidence to the NIAC looks quite negative. Perhaps the UUP, in light of its recent difficulties, should reflect on how its apparent endorsement/enthusiasm will go down in other parts of the UK.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 26th Mar 2011, SusieFlood wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 26th Mar 2011, SusieFlood wrote:Mark
LESSON LEARNT
On foot of posts 7 & 10
Don’t mention the words: Bloody, Hypocrisy, Mayhem, McGuinness & Protestant in a contribution to the DD.
Susie
Carryduff
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 27th Mar 2011, DisgustedinDERRY wrote:Mark
On the iPlayer there seems to be no sound on your 'Inside Politics' show???
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 27th Mar 2011, eyeswideopen1 wrote:Not aloud to comment and no sound on I player disgusted? I blame the securocrats! lol They wouldn,t be censoring republicanism again would they?
Anyway the message will get through loud and clear once the votes have been counted....
Eyes wide open ,,,,onward to victory
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 28th Mar 2011, DisgustedinDERRY wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 28th Mar 2011, ManOfPie wrote:@Susie (11)
All the danger words sound like cocktail ingredients.
Mark,
If I could be bothered, I'd fish through the DDs for the many "train-wreck in slow motion" descriptions I'd associated with the UU after their failure to elect Basil McCrea. The irony is, I don't even like the man in any case.
I can't wait for this election. I haven't been this excited since the whole Iris Robinson thing.
Love, PieMan
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)