Afghan end game peeks through headlines
鈥淣one of this will be easy, there will be more difficult days ahead," President Barack Obama said about the US-led war in Afghanistan today at the White House.
Mr Obama鈥檚 message was one of momentum toward a clear goal and a clear end in Afghanistan. Not nation building. Not a country free of corruption. But stopping al-Qaeda and the Taliban making a come-back. Behind the headlines, there鈥檚 an end game peeking through.
The president said 鈥渟ignificant progress鈥 was being made against al-Qaeda and that the US had seen "considerable gains鈥 against the Taliban
He made it clear this was not a given but because of his actions, and said the extra troops he sent in and their success on the ground had only been possible because he had withdrawn them from Iraq.
Most importantly, he not only defended his most controversial decision, he singled it out as a reason for success.
The president鈥檚 promise that troops will start coming home next summer was widely criticised, even by serving officers, as giving comfort to the enemy. But he said it had given a clear signal and created a sense of urgency, which in turn will create the conditions for a handover to Afghan forces in 2014.
Neither the by the White House national security staff nor the president suggested how many troops will come home in July 2011, nor whether that will be the start of a rolling-programme withdrawal.
But a decision has to be made, probably by next spring. That will mark a new phase in the conflict. The president鈥檚 next task is to design the path to a full hand-over. I鈥檝e been told by well plugged-in sources that this by the Center for a New American Security is a sensible and detailed plan. It emphases聽 action by special forces rather than regular troops.
It's pretty clear that if the difficulties I鈥檝e mentioned below are not solved, the reaction from the White House will not be 鈥渙ne more heave鈥 but 鈥渢hat鈥檚 life鈥.
Just about everyone agrees the current strategy of counter-insurgency, which is more about winning hearts and minds than simply killing the bad guys, is right. Right for now, that is. But next year expect a gradually transition to counter terrorism. When he's up for re-election in 2012, the president knows he won't in a position to declare victory. But he needs his policy to be seen as a reasonable success, so much so that it won't be a big issue.
I鈥檓 Mark Mardell, the 大象传媒's North America editor. These are my reflections on American politics, some thoughts on being a Brit living in the USA, and who knows what else? My 
Comments
or to comment.