I have just learned something very interesting about - the drive to regenerate competitive cricket in state schools - Sir Allen Stanford and the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB).
In June 2008, when the did the deal with Stanford on the $1m-a-man match it was announced that .
This was widely welcomed given the initiative's worthy objective of bringing cricket to two million children in a third of state schools by 2015.
The impact of ' decision to cut its by half by next year should not be underestimated.
In the last decade it had never reached before, and project itself as much more a world bank than the parochial British bank it was perceived to be.
The bank's investment in sport has been perhaps the most significant example of how the . And it is easy to see how .
I have learnt that three weeks ago the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) was warned that there was trouble brewing with Sir Allen Stanford. The ECB's response was to ask its auditors, Deloitte, to do further .
The ECB has so far refused to comment on the extra diligence that was performed, but its decision to suspend relations with Stanford as soon as US authorities announced they were investigating the Texan businessman for fraud suggests it knew something.
The saga has provoked a lot of debate this week, not least on my previous blog, so let me try to address some of the comments and questions.
First, let me say that when I interviewed Sir Allen back in November, I did indeed make the point about his charm and ability, like the best politicians, to really focus his energies on you.
But let's also be clear, that wasn't me endorsing him as a business partner for the or all his activities, it was just me reporting how he came across face-to-face.
The main charge against the on the issue of is not so much the question of whether it could have carried out better financial diligence - I shall return to the issue - but that it ever agreed to let the England team play in a match organised by a private individual.
It is important to note that many other cricket boards, and in particular the , would never have considered that.
Modern sports are a marriage between athletic activity and mammon.
The romantics among us like to believe that whatever the money men say, sporting endeavour honed on honest hard work and laced with brilliance, plus a bit of luck, will always triumph.
But no modern sports would be possible without sponsors, broadcasters and advertisers putting in pots of money.
The Super Bowl, the sporting party that brings America together, from to living rooms up and down the land, is the ultimate expression of this.
Yes, the match itself was superb and America will long debate whether it was the greatest ever Super Bowl.
Jump to more content from this blog
Mihir Bose's blog is no longer being updated. You can read recent entries about ´óÏó´«Ã½ Sport's coverage and insights into the latest issues on the Sport Editors' Blog.
You can stay up to date with Mihir Bose via these feeds.
Mihir Bose Feed(RSS)
Mihir Bose Feed(ATOM)
If you aren't sure what RSS is you'll find useful.
´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
