DTI, back from the dead
Here鈥檚 a funny thing. Years ago Gordon Brown made it clear to me that he would bury the , as and when he had the power to make or break government departments. But now that he has that power, he has decided to endeavour to redeem it as a proper ministry for business (though it may lose its battered 鈥淒TI鈥 moniker).
It鈥檒l lose its responsibilities for science, innovation and skills 鈥 which as I wrote here yesterday will be merged with the relevant bits of the to create some kind of ministry for improving the qualifications of the workforce and the capacity of British companies to translate research into saleable products and services.
But it will gain the deregulation unit from the and will retain its pro-competition, trade and pro-consumer mandates. Also, slightly against expectation, it will keep its energy responsibilities.
In the end, the new Prime Minister concluded that creating some kind of climate-change super-ministry 鈥 to include energy, transport and chunks of environment 鈥 would not be particularly efficient. Environmental campaigners may not agree, although the probably will.
I don鈥檛 know who will run either the new business department or the skills/science ministry. There鈥檚 been lots of talk of his adviser on business issues, Shriti Vadera, going to the Lords and becoming a minister 鈥 though my sense is that she鈥檇 prefer to work in international development if given the choice.
Interestingly, however, the Chancellor鈥檚 closest adviser, , seems set to become Secretary of State for the slightly remodelled Department of Education 鈥 which will be a big job, given that Brown finds it difficult to complete any sentence without saying how important he thinks education is to the future of the UK.
The other Brown priority is health 鈥 which is apparently going to . I鈥檓 minded to ask what harm Johnson ever did to Brown, since health is a bit of a graveyard for politicians.
Of the two Miliband wonderboys, one becomes the new as foreign secretary and the other,will have the daunting challenge of endeavouring to give coherence and shape to all Government policies as a senior minister without portfolio in the Cabinet Office.
The Chancellor, as has been widely expected for weeks, will be 鈥 whose hair actually turned white during his many years of unstinting loyalty to Brown and Blair.
UPDATE 16:15 So now we have a name for the reconstructed DTI: it鈥檒l be called the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, or DBERR for short. Which is not a moniker that trips off the tongue and leads me to only one conclusion: as and when Gordon Brown moves on from No.10, I won鈥檛 be employing him as a brand consultant.
That said, whether by chance or design, DIUS 鈥 or the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills, the other new business-focussed ministry 鈥 has a certain faux-classical gravitas.
颁辞尘尘别苍迟蝉听听 Post your comment
Let me guess: Gordon tried to use the Downing Street computer to generate a new name for the DTI, but the database broke and the system displayed only "DB ERR".
Very pleased that they retain their business focus. For years they have beaten the pants off every other country in Europe regarding attracting inward investment .... Get them to focus on this and they are easily worth the taxpayers investment
Colin C
DBERR sounds like something Homer Simpson might utter after multiple Duffs. The historians amongst your readers will appreciate my earnest hope that sense returns to those responsible for governmental titles (and acronyms) and we all revert to calling the said department what it should always been called: the Board of Trade (BoT). So much easier on the memory and far more readily identifiable.
Conversely, "DBERR" reinds me of a well-known diamond trading company, and "DIUS" sounds to me like "die, us".
Under this government (and particularly the former Chancellor) business has been given a very free rein, whilst education has been kept on a very short leash with little done to encourage innovation.
Do these new names indicate a continuation - or even an intensification - of that stance?
Perhaps a competition for what DBERR might stand for is needed?
Here's mine: Dour Browns Economy Runs Risks
Better still can we have a General Election please.