´óÏó´«Ã½

´óÏó´«Ã½ BLOGS - Test Match Special
« Previous | Main | Next »

England on top with disciplined showing

Jonathan Agnew | 18:07 UK time, Saturday, 1 December 2007

There is no doubt that England won the early salvos in this three-match series against Sri Lanka on .

But with the pitch certain to take increasing amounts of spin, their batsmen need to post a substantial lead to counter the possibility of revitalising his dispirited-looking team.

Michael Vaughan desperately wanted to win the toss on this straw-coloured and paceless strip but, having failed to do so, he did make the point that the best time for visiting teams to bowl here is on the first day.

Vaughan worked endlessly on tactics and Hoggard benefitted

Perhaps he meant it, perhaps it was kidology to spur on his bowlers who looked on less than thrilled from the dressing-room.

But whatever it was produced a disciplined and controlled response with scarcely a bad ball bowled in the first session.

Kevin Pietersen – not known for his – set the tone in that department with a brilliant diving catch at point to remove a typically cavalier Sanath Jayasuriya in only the third over.

After Matthew Hoggard tempted Michael Vandort to chip a catch to mid on, he went on to claim three more wickets in 12 deliveries by virtue of pitching the ball up and allowing it to swing just enough.

Hoggard is a tireless campaigner, but Vaughan was equally busy, moving the fielders here and there almost every ball as he sought to put pressure on the batsmen.

At 42-5, Sri Lanka’s miserable experience in Australia appeared to have beaten any fight out of them and they were destined for complete embarrassment.

At least Kumar Sangakkara – now one of the world’s greats - and Prasanna Jayawardene managed to battle it out in a stand of 106 for the sixth wicket.

It required a stroke of luck to part them, Jayawardene turning Monty Panesar off the face of the bat into Alastair Cook’s body at short leg.

But with the long tail exposed, Sangakkara found himself facing the prospect of running out of partners.

Paul Collingwood’s brilliant catch denied Sangakkara another century, and the tail folded meekly.

This might well become a feature of the series – England’s tail starts with Ryan Sidebottom at number eight.

The front line batsmen on both teams will have to decide how they are going to manage if they are confronted with a similar dilemma to that of Sangakkara.

Ravi Bopara, for example, must have a clear plan in his mind as to whether he will farm the strike and turn down runs, or leave the tail-enders to cope for themselves.

In an interview before play started, he admitted to not having given it any thought yet!

Another feature will be bad light curtailing the amount of play in each day. Hopefully common sense will prevail, and play will start half an hour earlier in the remaining two Tests to prevent too much time being lost.

°ä´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õÌýÌýPost your comment

  • 1.
  • At 06:25 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • C.Christmas wrote:

Good summary Aggers, I agree that the dilemma over how to treat the tail-enders is an important one for both teams (although counting Vaas as part of it seems a tad unfair, he's no rabbit as far as occupying the crease is concerned). I agree with the commentator on TMS this morning (I think it was you in fact? I could be wrong) who said that rotating the strike was counterproductive and ultimately they should try and bat as best they can. If they're going to get any better, they need to be exposed to hostile bowling. Admittedly, if we were playing for a draw, I'd understand a rotation policy; but wherever possible, I think the tail-enders should be left to their own devices.

  • 2.
  • At 06:29 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Anonymous wrote:

Pietersen's catch was taken at extra-cover, not point.

  • 3.
  • At 06:33 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Adam wrote:

Pietersen's catch was taken at extra-cover, not point.

  • 4.
  • At 07:34 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Michael wrote:

Pietersen is a very good fielder, he just had a very bad time of it in the 2005 Ashes. To keep referring back to that is lazy journalism.

Admittedly, he's not of the calibre of Collingwood or Jonty Rhodes, but not many are.

  • 5.
  • At 07:35 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • muadh wrote:

if england contiue to bat well they will get 350+

  • 6.
  • At 07:38 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • sloggerian wrote:

You have way too much time on your hands Adam - incidentally is that Adam "ped" Ant?

Good article Jonathan - an intriguing start to the series - can't wait to see if England's batsman can apply themselves in the heat and under the undoubted mental torture to come from Murali.

  • 7.
  • At 08:02 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Andy Sea wrote:

It wasn't the Sri Lanka tail that let them down (and only two of them were dismissed by England bowlers)but their top order. And the reason for that is that England's tail - the bowlers - did what they were picked to do - take wickets.

  • 8.
  • At 08:45 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Tom Robertson wrote:

Sangakkara's continued performances pass with little comment these days. It is expected that a batter with a test average 50+ will perform. I think we are in the presence of a major historical phonomenon here and he seems to be getting better, however dire the circumstance.

Well done England - an excellent day. Now let's get a decent first innings lead.

  • 9.
  • At 08:46 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Abs wrote:

Hoggard proved a valuble asset again, taking out some of the best around, must admit though after the world cup final weve never seen the best of Sri Lanka!!

Lets hope the batsmen especially the 2 there now can go for a bit if 2 of them (ne of the top order that is) can get around 100 n another 1 or 2 around 50 it will b a very good lead!!

  • 10.
  • At 08:47 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • Kevin wrote:

Vaughan and Bell complimented each other fantastically well, with Vaughan dropping anchor at the crease while Bell let loose some lovely strokes. Bopara is going to be under a bit of pressure as the new guy to make some runs and will probably bat tomorrow on a very helpful strip. Very important for England not to be complacent early tomorrow and lose wickets because this one is very much in the balance and Murali and Malinga can hurt us.

  • 11.
  • At 10:58 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • funcrusher wrote:

It's a shame that Aggers has a track record of begrudging credit to Vaughan's captaincy - even undermining him in ODI - when so many foreign commentators are quick to spot his astute contributions. His Lazarus-style return from injury has resurrected England from a shambles and shown again that a good captain is the critical component of any cricket team. Good direction on the field and leadership at all times can turn mediochre players into a formidable team. In fact 'star' captains rarely make the best captains...Botham, Flintoff, Lara etc

  • 12.
  • At 11:52 PM on 01 Dec 2007,
  • John wrote:

This has set England up fantastically. In not gambling like Pakistan did, England kept on persevering while Sangakkara kept them at bay while everyone else around him collapsed.

Like most would agree, England will now need to consolidate their innings, get runs on the board, keep their heads in check, and get a nice total -- not batting again is a super-ultra bonus, not a right, on surprise pitches like these.

  • 13.
  • At 01:49 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • Andrew wrote:

Bopara "admitted" he has given no thought to batting with the tail?

Perhaps Ravi is a little smarter than you give him credit for Aggers. If I were in his position, I'd deny having thought about it too - both to avoid the obvious follow-up question, and so to avoid giving the opponents anything to go on.

As the whole team probably talked about the tail's batting as part of their preparation, it's probably reasonable to suppose that Bopara was kidding.

  • 14.
  • At 02:04 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • Floyd wrote:

England bowled fantastically well, but the loss of Cook and Vaughan looking like he was about to get out at any moment, we shouldn't write off Sri Lanka just yet - remember England's first innings against The Presidents' XI (when they didn't even have Murali playing)?

Still, I think England will have been massively relieved to have seen the day curtailed by bad light. Hopefully, it will give them time to calm the nerves down a bit and come out this morning ready to take on Murali and Malinga!

  • 15.
  • At 07:51 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • amelie hortensia wrote:

So the virtuous Hoggard 'tempted' the Sri Lankan batsman into getting out (not at all that Vandort is pants)but Monty required 'a stroke of luck'-but of course - Monty's a trier, not much talent but he's in the side just in case he gets 'lucky'. So Bopara has 'no plan' for batting with the tail-enders but presumably Cook/Vaughan/Bell/Pietersen/Collywood/Prior have? Of course they do, silly me -their track record of batting with the tail proves it! Maybe you can get Ravi to 'admit' something else -that he's not worthy of being in the side in your opinion. Great investigative journalism. Like when you found out that Fredalo the pedalo had turned up scootered at a training session (well you read someone's book a year later). Keep up the good work! You're right on the money!

  • 16.
  • At 08:02 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • timtheoracle wrote:

weather permitting ! what is a good lead?Forecast is showers.JUST getting light here 730.barmy army carols
surreal, another promising start but!!!

  • 17.
  • At 08:49 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • Stephen Evans wrote:

"England on top with disciplined showing" ????

I do not know much about cricket, but I know enough that each team takes turns to bat and bowl. I think if you check your past commentaries where England have taken out a good team for a low runs total. The other team have more often than not done the same to England.

  • 18.
  • At 09:10 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • Alex wrote:

What always happens immediately after England give a fantastic showing with the ball on one day of a test match?

Inevitably, they collapse with the bat.

It's a classic example in this test - within a few runs of their target and they all capitulate.

No mental strength and never enough technique and skill in the batting department!

Some serious training with whoever trains the Aussies and South Africans is in order to get England's batting up to scratch.

  • 19.
  • At 10:38 AM on 02 Dec 2007,
  • philip wrote:

it's 104 GMT. All the other cricket sites i have checked now contain reviews of day 2 of the Test. Why is the ´óÏó´«Ã½ site so slow in getting its comments up? I can't find any link to a review of day 2 here! maybe it's me but I have had a good look. Also Aggers excellent end of play round up (just like TMS used to have in the brilliant old days) comes out far too late to be of any real use. It needs to be on the site really soon after close of play so that it can be downloaded and listened to before all the other cricket reporting takes away from its usefulness. Hope you can address these points. Thanks.

This post is closed to new comments.

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.