John Hunt and Aintree.co.uk

Complaint

A visitor to the website Aintree.co.uk complained that the participation of John Hunt in a series of short videos discussing horse racing tips and his appearance in a promotional tweet wearing a jacket with the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Sport logo were inappropriate in the light of his work as a ´óÏó´«Ã½ racing commentator.  The ECU considered the complaint in connection with the Editorial Guidelines on conflicts of interest.


Outcome

The relevant Guidelines say:

A potential conflict of interest arises when there is the possibility that an individual’s external activities or interests may affect, or be reasonably perceived as affecting, the ´óÏó´«Ã½â€™s impartiality and its integrity, or risk damaging the ´óÏó´«Ã½â€™s reputation generally or the value of the ´óÏó´«Ã½ brand. 

And, with reference to outside work involving on air talent, they explain that:

Advertisements or promotions involving talent should not imitate, suggest a reference or connection to or ‘pass off’ ´óÏó´«Ã½ content, for example, by replicating any editorial elements of a programme, such as characters, logos, titles, channel names or music or graphics associated with the programme, or by using or directly imitating sets or key venues, catchphrases or format points from the content.

Nothing emerged from the ECU’s enquiries which suggested that Mr Hunt’s work for Aintree.co.uk might reasonably be perceived as affecting the ´óÏó´«Ã½â€™s impartiality or integrity or putting the ´óÏó´«Ã½â€™s reputation or the value of its brand at risk, and the complaint was not upheld in that respect.   However, ´óÏó´«Ã½ Sport accepted that his appearance wearing the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Sport logo in  the tweet complained of had the potential to suggest ´óÏó´«Ã½ endorsement of a commercial product, and the ECU judged that it did not conform to the relevant Guideline.  As the material in question had subsequently been removed from the website and, independently of its enquiries, the management of ´óÏó´«Ã½ Sport had discussed the issue with Mr Hunt, the ECU considered sufficient steps had been taken to resolve the issue of complaint.

Resolved