´óÏó´«Ã½

Ambridge Extra  permalink

Listen to AmEx

This discussion has been closed.

Messages: 1 - 50 of 76
  • Message 1. 

    Posted by Anonymous (U14994586) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Then it might make you feel a bit different about Kate.

    Report message1

  • Message 2

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by JoinedPeetsBoard_Smeesues_too (U14519481) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I have - I'm afraid I still don't ..!
    JPBS

    Report message2

  • Message 3

    , in reply to message 2.

    Posted by Vicarshusband (U6051871) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I won't. AmEx isn't real. I don't care what fantasy is cooked up over there, it ISN'T REAL and has nothing to do with the The Archers.

    Which is real, obviously.

    Er. Well, real-er, anyway.

    VH

    Report message3

  • Message 4

    , in reply to message 3.

    Posted by Anonymous (U14994586) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Well, it is real, because it's happening at the same time as this series. In fact, anyone who listened would know why Kate first agreed to the holiday, and why she sounded so detached on the phone.

    If anything, my knowledge of the situation made me like Hayley even less than Kate.

    Report message4

  • Message 5

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by JoinedPeetsBoard_Smeesues_too (U14519481) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    But whatever the reason - Kate was so bliddy *arrogant*. She doesn't care a fig for Phoebe .
    JPBS

    Report message5

  • Message 6

    , in reply to message 5.

    Posted by gigglemahanaz2 (U14257954) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I listen to both and i still think Kate is selfish......she's reaping now what she's sown over the years as far as I'm concerned!

    Now the boot's on the other foot Kate can't handle things!

    Report message6

  • Message 7

    , in reply to message 4.

    Posted by Chris Ghoti (U10794176) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Anonymous, at least three quarters of the listeners to The Archers have chosen not to listen to Ambridge Extra and may not take kindly to being told about it. There is a special area set up for discussion of Ambridge Extra. I wonder how many people listen to Ambridge Extra and not to The Archers....

    Personally I find it despicable that in their desperate wish to do as their political paymasters have required of them and force the country to use DAB, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are so blatently going back on their word about the two programmes not relying on each other for understanding.

    Report message7

  • Message 8

    , in reply to message 1.

    Posted by siriol (U14748387) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I'm often using Catch Up at present as I have had more than enough of the witness intimadation story. The thought of an extra 30 minutes of AmEx seems like a step too far at the moment. I did listen to some of the last series but won't bother this time. I do find it irritating how you always get to know what's happening in the end from TA message board though

    Report message8

  • Message 9

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by HtoHe (U2335032) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    message 7

    << the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are so blatently going back on their word about the two programmes not relying on each other for understanding. >>

    You're not wrong, Chris. I tuned in for The Write Stuff this evening and just caught the TA theme tune followed by a message from the continuity person pretty much saying if you want to know what's going on with Phoebe and Kate switch to R4Extra right now. Ironically, I'd just tuned away from R4Extra to avoid it!

    Report message9

  • Message 10

    , in reply to message 8.

    Posted by typewright (U14048004) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    But this is a SL on TA. It should stand or fall as a SL on TA. We shouldn't need to listen to a programme on another radio station to understand it.

    Report message10

  • Message 11

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by Buntysdaughter (U7084475) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Exactly !

    Report message11

  • Message 12

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by Polly Tunnel (U1530077) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Personally I find it despicable that in their desperate wish to do as their political paymasters have required of them and force the country to use DAB, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are so blatently going back on their word about the two programmes not relying on each other for understanding. 

    I listen to AmEx on my computer so I have managed the UK to frustrate the Government conspiracy to force me to use DAB.
    TA does not rely on AmEx for any understanding of the repercussion in Ambridge of Pheebs staying in SA. After all not hearing the Australian end of Kenton's marriage breakup didn't make any difference because the important facts were reported for the TA audience to hear which is exactly what is happening with Kate and Pheebs.

    Report message12

  • Message 13

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    But this is a SL on TA. It should stand or fall as a SL on TA. We shouldn't need to listen to a programme on another radio station to understand it. 

    You don't NEED to know why Kate has her mind elsewhere.

    Nor do you NEED a new wireless to listen to AmEx.

    Report message13

  • Message 14

    , in reply to message 10.

    Posted by NewEssexWoman (U9776561) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    But this is a SL on TA. It should stand or fall as a SL on TA. We shouldn't need to listen to a programme on another radio station to understand it. 

    You don't need to listen to AmEx. By not doing so you are in the same situation as R&H - Feebs wanting to stay in SA is a bolt from the blue (though why that pair of imbiciles had no idea that Feebs is having a great time in SA is anyone's guess). The SL is still coherent (other than the SA term times that Chris has illuminated). Hpowever, if you do listen to AmEx then you'll understand things a bit more from Feeb's and kate's prospective as well.

    I can't see anything wrong with this at all.

    Report message14

  • Message 15

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by typewright (U14048004) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Who said you need a new listening device to recieve R4Extra? Not me.

    Report message15

  • Message 16

    , in reply to message 13.

    Posted by StargazerwithOscar (U14668197) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Can you still turn the knobs to Hilversum and Luxemburg on your wireless, Icon?

    Report message16

  • Message 17

    , in reply to message 12.

    Posted by cath (U2234232) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I don't listen to every epi of TA - only those that are on when I'm around - and over the last few months that means I've caught usually one or two epis each week , sometimes three, as I don't do LA any more - well maybe twice since Nigel died. I don't have the time or inclination to LA on my computer.

    I did listen to Amex this evening as it was on when I was around and I dislike that smug R4 programme that's on at the same time. I cope pretty well with what I don't hear. What I heard /before/ I heard Amex was a 14 year old saying she wanted to stay longer in SA than originally planned, sounding really upbeat, her mum defending her and her father and step mum and would-be bf being understandably upset.

    Report message17

  • Message 18

    , in reply to message 15.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Who said you need a new listening device to recieve R4Extra? Not me. 

    Poly Tunnel in Msg 12

    << Can you still turn the knobs to Hilversum and Luxemburg on your wireless, Icon? >>

    I do have one still in use that has stickers to mark the positions of the new-fangled Radios 1,2,3,4.

    Report message18

  • Message 19

    , in reply to message 18.

    Posted by StargazerwithOscar (U14668197) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    As long as they don't get rid of Housewives' Choice, I'll be happy.

    Report message19

  • Message 20

    , in reply to message 18.

    Posted by Polly Tunnel (U1530077) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Who said you need a new listening device to recieve R4Extra? Not me.

    Poly Tunnel in Msg 12 


    Not guilty, me lord. Try message 7.

    Report message20

  • Message 21

    , in reply to message 20.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Not guilty, me lord. Try message 7. 

    Sorry Polly.

    Poor Chris - D&V and high BP both at once.

    Report message21

  • Message 22

    , in reply to message 12.

    Posted by HtoHe (U2335032) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    message 12

    << After all not hearing the Australian end of Kenton's marriage breakup didn't make any difference because the important facts were reported for the TA audience to hear which is exactly what is happening with Kate and Pheebs. >>

    It's not even essentially, let alone exactly, the same Polly. In the earlier case - and in all cases before AmEx came along - the only 'facts' were what happened or was reported on TA. Whatever you think of AmEx, what happens there is as 'factual' as anything that happens or is reported on TA. The pretence, when AmEx came along, was pretty much that you could, if you wished, ignore its existence and your appreciation of TA would be none the worse. This was, to say the least, a disingenuous claim because it could only truly apply to people who only ever discuss TA with people who also ignore AmEx. Now, as I mentioned above, you have the continuity person telling you in no uncertain terms that there's more to the story than what you've just heard and all you have to do is switch to R4Extra straight away. So, if it doesn't make any difference, how come they're making such an immediate and direct connec tion at a time when TA listeners can hardly fail to hear?

    Report message22

  • Message 23

    , in reply to message 22.

    Posted by Vicarshusband (U6051871) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Why has the OP been hidden? If I recall correctly it just said "listen to AmEx for more background on this SL". It didn't say what the background was.

    It can't be simply that it mentioned AmEx, can it?

    I think the whole idea of AmEx is nonsense, but there's no point banning it from even being mentioned here.

    VH

    Report message23

  • Message 24

    , in reply to message 7.

    Posted by Paul237 (U12153576) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    A least three quarters? Where's the source for that figure?

    Report message24

  • Message 25

    , in reply to message 22.

    Posted by Chris Ghoti (U10794176) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    HtoHe, I think it is the same reason that on weekdays they frequently tell us, at seven o'clock just before the news and Archers, that we should be listening to the comedy on Radio 4 Extra. Theyare desperately trying to get people to listen to the duff tech forced upon them by the government a few years ago. It was obsolete even then and is even more so now, but they were compelled to pay for it and want to get what they can of their money's worth out of it.

    That is the reason for Ambridge Extra existing: they told us at the time that it was to get listeners from Radio 4 to go to their new programme. (It was actually an old programme, Radio 7, made up of old programmes, but that is another matter.)

    Report message25

  • Message 26

    , in reply to message 24.

    Posted by Chris Ghoti (U10794176) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    My source for that figure is RAJAR, Paul; last time it appeared, just over a million listeners were claimed for the entire output of Radio 4 Extra and just over five million listeners were claimed for The Archers. Even if the entire tranche who listen to R4E all listened to AE, they would still be less than a quarter of those who listen to TA.

    Report message26

  • Message 27

    , in reply to message 26.

    Posted by Paul237 (U12153576) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Surely that doesn't account for those who listen to AmEx via their computers or those that download the podcast, though?

    I download the podcast myself as I don't have a DAB radio. I'm sure many others are in the same boat as me.

    Report message27

  • Message 28

    , in reply to message 25.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    HtoHe, I think it is the same reason that on weekdays they frequently tell us, at seven o'clock just before the news and Archers, that we should be listening to the comedy on Radio 4 Extra. Theyare desperately trying to get people to listen to the duff tech forced upon them by the government a few years ago. It was obsolete even then and is even more so now, but they were compelled to pay for it and want to get what they can of their money's worth out of it. 

    Better if they dump DAB entirely IMHO.

    Anyone know how the R4X audience splits between DAB, Radio via TV, and Internet?

    Report message28

  • Message 29

    , in reply to message 25.

    Posted by HtoHe (U2335032) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    message 25

    I liked R7 and I listen to R4Extra quite a lot, Chris; but I think what they've done with the AmEx project is at best ill-conceived and at worst devious. I was also very glad when DAB was introduced as at that time I was living in a area with poor FM reception so crystal clear R4 and, especially, R3 was a godsend before I ever experimented with R7. I still get better results with DAB than FM though I am aware of the problems with it. I don't regret buying my DAB sets but I agree with you that attempts to force other people to buy them are wrong. And splitting the Ambridge broadcasts over two different stations - whatever platform they're on - was a very bad idea in my opinion.

    Report message29

  • Message 30

    , in reply to message 26.

    Posted by fabsupergran (U11440988) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    If tonight is anything to go by it will also be really difficult to enter into discusssions on ML if you have listened to Amex without giving anything away and spoiling it for others.

    It reminds me of listening to my Grandchildren when one has a secret he or she has been told not to tell ' I know something you dont know '

    Report message30

  • Message 31

    , in reply to message 30.

    Posted by Chris Ghoti (U10794176) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Fabbers, I tell you, it almosts seem that the editorial team actively dislike and despise their audience, and want to make the majority of them feel second-class.

    Paul, the RAJAR figures have been claimed to be adjusted for people listening by other means than a dradio receiver, though how it is done I don't know. They extrapolate from a sample in the hundreds anyhow. so presumably they have some way of doing that, and they hundreds they take questionnaires from are not only those who listen using only a radio.

    Report message31

  • Message 32

    , in reply to message 31.

    Posted by Schez (U2212013) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I can only speak of AmEx from what I've read in ML, and it seems that stories are rather different in AmEx, for example the Amy story, whereas tonight some o f you seem to be saying that AmEx just fills in the gaps.

    If there are indeed gaps that could do with filling in, why can't we have a bit less of WR taking several seconds to say "Yeah" in that dreadful breathy way, and fill those moments with a bit more actual story?

    And as for "You don't NEED to know why Kate has her mind elsewhere". maybe I didn't before because it didn't mean anything to me, but now I've read that, I definitely NEED to know!.

    Report message32

  • Message 33

    , in reply to message 31.

    Posted by Paul237 (U12153576) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Well, it doesn't seem accurate enough to me. There are too many other ways of listening to Radio 4 Extra programmes to make a truly accurate figure. Plus, I'm sure they're just using DAB stats and comparing like for like.

    But all that aside, even if 25% of TA listeners were listening to AmEx, I don't see that as a reason to call AmEx a failure, or use it to back a "AmEx should be scrapped" argument. These things take time. Not everyone will make the switch in the first year.

    From someone who listens to both, I can say that listening to AmEx isn't a necessity. It gives a bit of a different perspective, yes, but TA never assumes the listener has heard AmEx. TA listeners are told all pertinent info.

    Report message33

  • Message 34

    , in reply to message 33.

    Posted by Froginasock (U14272821) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    The chances of DAB being dumped are roughly the same as vinyl displacing downloads.

    Which is to say, nil.

    Report message34

  • Message 35

    , in reply to message 32.

    Posted by cath (U2234232) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    >And as for "You don't NEED to know why Kate has her mind elsewhere". maybe I didn't before because it didn't mean anything to me, but now I've read that, I definitely NEED to know!.<

    I think that if you have a computer and have ever LAed to TA then you can LA to AmEx.

    The only people who are genuinely disadvantaged by AmEx on R4X are those listeners without access to DAB or a computer with a sound card.

    Report message35

  • Message 36

    , in reply to message 33.

    Posted by Chris Ghoti (U10794176) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Paul, I'm sure plenty of people listen to Radio 4 by other means than a radio apparatus. We have been told by Ms Tayler that RAJAR also accept other sorts of listenening in their figures.

    I think you will find that I have not called Ambridge Extra a failure, nor used that to back the argument that Ambridge Extra is not neccessary. What I *do* say is that it is making three-quarters of the listeners to The Archers second class, in that there are people (of whom you are not one) who crow about how much they know if they chose to tell, behaving like six year olds with a secret, and making sure that the rest of us are made to know we are not in their little gang. Tedious to a degree, but difficult to be left unmoved by.

    Report message36

  • Message 37

    , in reply to message 34.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    In reply to Froginasock:

    The chances of DAB being dumped are roughly the same as vinyl displacing downloads.

    Which is to say, nil. 


    Abandonment may be unlikely, but I think it may well be succeeded by a better system before it ever becomes universal.

    Or AM/FM be allowed to continue forever.

    Report message37

  • Message 38

    , in reply to message 33.

    Posted by fabsupergran (U11440988) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Well I certainly thought that having listened to tonights Am Ex (the first I had heard since the very first one) it gave a whole new perspective to the Phoebe situation and I think that listeners to TA SHOULD know the whole story as well.

    It makes a huge difference to the take on the whole story

    Report message38

  • Message 39

    , in reply to message 38.

    Posted by cath (U2234232) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Why? All I heard was that Feebs wants to stay on in SA to go camping with her mates (including a boy Josh is jealous of)?

    Report message39

  • Message 40

    , in reply to message 38.

    Posted by Schez (U2212013) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Cath I dare say I could LA to AmEx if I wanted to, but to trawl through however many programmes just to find this out is really not how I want to spend my time.

    As fabsupergran says, TA is and always was the main programme and if the ´óÏó´«Ã½ decide they are going to fill in gaps in the story or add things that TA listeners don't hear, I don't think that's a good idea at all.

    Report message40

  • Message 41

    , in reply to message 36.

    Posted by Paul237 (U12153576) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Just to clarify, I didn't mean to imply that you personally had called Ambridge Extra a failure, I was speaking generally.

    I think it's all about interpretation anyway. I'm sure no Ambridge Extra listeners want to come across as children, some people are just misinterpreting it.

    After all, we're discussing fictional radio dramas here. It's not *that* serious.

    Report message41

  • Message 42

    , in reply to message 40.

    Posted by cath (U2234232) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    >, TA is and always was the main programme and if the ´óÏó´«Ã½ decide they are going to fill in gaps in the story or add things that TA listeners don't hear, I don't think that's a good idea at all.<

    Well I only hear what's broadcast in real time these days so I don't hear much of TA in the first place. It doesn't actually matter as I seem to be able to keep up even if I'm not at the same level as people who listen to every epi without fail. I view AmEx in the the same way. And from what I heard this evening no one's missing anything. Just more pap.

    Report message42

  • Message 43

    , in reply to message 41.

    Posted by JoinedPeetsBoard_Smeesues_too (U14519481) on Sunday, 8th July 2012


    After all, we're discussing fictional radio dramas here. It's not *that* serious. 

    Not SERIOUS! Wash your mouth out with soap Paul..

    I feel though as if we've been blackmailed by the ´óÏó´«Ã½ into listening to AmEx. How can you know it is worth while unless you try it?

    I DO listen and really wish they would combine the two. If it means cutting out some of the daft stereotypical stories about Grundy "scams" then so much the better
    JPBS

    Report message43

  • Message 44

    , in reply to message 40.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Cath I dare say I could LA to AmEx if I wanted to, but to trawl through however many programmes just to find this out is really not how I want to spend my time. 

    There are only two programmes so far of the current AmEx and you can get them both on your PC NOW with a single click from the home page here

    Or if that is too much trouble, here

    Report message44

  • Message 45

    , in reply to message 36.

    Posted by bebopalula (U8847542) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I check out TA spoilers now and then and did so tonight. I was quite mystified by what I was reading and then the penny dropped I had clicked into an Amex spoiler. It never occurred to me that there would be any AMex spoilers in there and I have to say they give far more information than TA spoilers - you can listen to TA and top up ( if you want the whole story but don't want to actually listen to Amex) by checking out Amex spoilers.

    Bebop

    Report message45

  • Message 46

    , in reply to message 45.

    Posted by JoinedPeetsBoard_Smeesues_too (U14519481) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I guess its because they don't provide a proper synopsis for AmEx .
    JPBS

    Report message46

  • Message 47

    , in reply to message 46.

    Posted by bebopalula (U8847542) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    Well I think it is all getting out of hand!

    Bebop

    Report message47

  • Message 48

    , in reply to message 43.

    Posted by Organoleptic Icon (U11219171) on Sunday, 8th July 2012

    I DO listen and really wish they would combine the two. 

    But BunSoc that would remove the whole PURPOSE of AmEx which is clearly to drum up listeners for R4X.

    And which presumably comes with some R4X budget.

    Report message48

  • Message 49

    , in reply to message 43.

    Posted by Lilians twin (U4487710) on Monday, 9th July 2012

    Podcast both TA & AMEX here. Was anti AMEX in the beginning but now wish it was on every day. Maybe that's because TV is such rubbish nowadays that the highlight of the week is yet another repeat of Dad's Army leaving TA & AMEX as more or less my only form of entertainment. How sad is that?

    Lils xxx

    Report message49

  • Message 50

    , in reply to message 49.

    Posted by Rose Sal Volatile Parade (U4705648) on Monday, 9th July 2012

    There's a lot of good stuff on TV. The Big Bang Theory is on every day like Friends used to be and it's great. Try that instead of AmEX - it's funny and witty and sharp and fast-moving and well acted in spades. Wallander was fab last night. Family Guy is usually there somewhere. Episodes has been excellent this season.

    Report message50

Back to top

About this Board

Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.

or  to take part in a discussion.


The message board is currently closed for posting.

This messageboard is now closed.

This messageboard is .

Find out more about this board's

Search this Board

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.