This discussion has been closed.
Posted by Lakey_Hill (U14391672) on Wednesday, 8th August 2012
No, not a lesbian discussion ...
Why can't the SWs give Kirsty and Fallon a break, and a good storyline, for once in a while? I really hate the way that so many of the younger women in Ambridge are dished up such mundane deals in life, when it seems that they should be able to do so much better. Kirstie, Fallon, Emma, Brenda ...
You'll be giving the seemingly 'let's turn them gay' writers ideas, naming Kirsty and Fallon together!
I've said before, Kirsty only ever seems to get something to say in TAX now, and Fallon seems to speak even less than that.
Why can't the SWs give Kirsty and Fallon a break, and a good storyline, for once in a while?Â
I'm sure both of them /will/ get their break. Both of them not meeting the right person is pretty true to RL, so why /shouldn't/ the SWs take their time? When things prove all rosy, people will complain anyway.
Welcome to the Archers Messageboard.
or  to take part in a discussion.
The message board is currently closed for posting.
This messageboard is now closed.
This messageboard is .
Find out more about this board's
Copyright © 2015 ´óÏó´«Ã½. The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.