大象传媒

Explore the 大象传媒
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.

15 October 2014
WW2 - People's War

大象传媒 Homepage
大象传媒 History
WW2 People's War Homepage Archive List Timeline About This Site

Contact Us

The Lack of Nelson

by swallow

Contributed by听
swallow
People in story:听
Peter Faggetter
Location of story:听
Europe
Background to story:听
Civilian
Article ID:听
A2757305
Contributed on:听
17 June 2004

With Hitler and his armies having not learned the lesson of Napoleon - namely that of undertaking an invasion without sufficient thought given to proper clothing to tackle a Russian winter - and thus suffering defeat, I always feel that D Day planners completely ignored the genius of Lord Nelson. There's no doubt he'd have had a completely different strategy, and like all his battles - Copenhagen, the Nile, and Trafalgar, the outcome was decisive and positive. It strikes me this was because he intended winning, and for that purpose he believed in taking the fight to the enemy at close quarters.

When I see newsreel footage of the Normandy landings it's immediately very noticeable that there was a general lack of smoke cover for the seasick chaps struggling ashore weighed down with 'clobber' and soggy clothes. Luckily I was only just 17 years old at the time, still a civvy, but chafing at the bit as they say, for I had definate plans of joining the 'show' in my due time.
But now in my wise old age I'm eternally grateful that I missed the 'call' to meet the Jerry foe by six months.

It's said officially, that the D Day landings was a close run thing -and it was, there's no doubt about that. Also it's said that much of the German forces composed of poor grade soldiers, men of mixed nationalities from occupied countries, and boys and sick old men.
Whatever, although Lord Nelson wasn't a soldier, his tactic would still have been to close his capital ships with the enemy. After all, it was an established fact before 1944, that the day of the great battleships was over;aeroplanes had proved the point time and again, from Taranto, Pearl Harbour, battleships at Alexandria, Barham, Repulse and Prince of Wales, Bismark and Hood, Tirpitz and the Japanese giants. Therefore by 1944 most battleships still active were merely big gun platforms for shelling land targets in the Pacific advance on Japan and the landings in North Africa and Italy.
Therefore by June 1944 - knowing how ineffective these long range shellings were against the dug-in-deep Japanese on their islands, that hefty shells at Salerno and Anzio achieved nothing, our war planners should have realised that Germany's west wall soldiers would have deep shelters to avoid the soften-up shelling just as they had done in the Great War. The lesson was, all shelling counts for nothing if you're not killing the defenders.
And this was the story of D Day too; few German soldiers were knocked out by the inaccurate battleship shells fired at long range, etc. There was no other worthwhile employment for them by mid 1944, and soon - after we had won the WAR - they'd be just so much unwanted scrapyard junk. So on D Day these giants should have been better employed by doing the Nelson thing - that of closing the enemy. Some - not all - should have been run ashore at full speed ahead at high tide to form beach fortresses. Perhaps with some extra bow re-inforcement (experiment) or full ice-breaker stem, these unstoppable giants would have cleaved a path clear through the obstacles and their anti landing craft mines - exploding them with little effect on battleship hulls - and driven themselves full onto the beaches and sand dunes. Here every great gun shell would have dug out any beach or cliff fortifications both dead ahead and in left and right enfilade, and with all the secondary armament in support of its own defence and, following landing craft troops arriving via the big ship's cleared channels.
Two expendable battleshps per landing beach would seem to be ideal, for now massive crossfire could come into play; and, together with their varying height advantage over the German beach defenders - and creating belching gun smoke - the mile apart steel forts would be un-matchable. This was 'Victory' at Trafalgar; with Lord Nelson in visible close contact and making every cannon ball and musket shot count. Both British and French ships were moving quite slowly due to light winds, thus in effect making static targets - similar to land conditions. Here Lord Nelson became an easy musket target for a marksman for, being himself at deck level, the high ground/masted Frenchman's shot struck downwards through Nelson's body. So while the high ground proved its value yet again, the threat of Napoleon's cross Channel invasion melted with the French ships in defeat.
Battle was won by nerve and sacrifice, while the steel monsters of majestic shape could, after also serving as breakwaters, remain as long-lasting monuments for thousands of D Day veterans and enthusiasts to marvel at in the years to come.

end

Copyright of content contributed to this Archive rests with the author. Find out how you can use this.

Forum Archive

This forum is now closed

These messages were added to this story by site members between June 2003 and January 2006. It is no longer possible to leave messages here. Find out more about the site contributors.

Message 1 - The Lack Of Nelson

Posted on: 18 June 2004 by Sinbadnick

I'm afraid that if you have never been
in any action were the big warships are' then you can't know what it is
realy like,I'm 83years old and I have
been in quite a lot of action where the big guns have been used not just to sink ships but to bombard oil depot's and ammunition dump's and all
sorts of instalations in enemy ports,
take for instance the desert campaign
we hit almost every harbour from the
renowned Tobruck right up to Tripoli
time after time and when we left them
they were not of much use to Rommel.
Now I was also in at the sinking of
the Mighty Bismark Germany's biggest
battleship and my ship although not a
battleship fired 240 8"shells at her'
and also at the same time watched our
Battleship firing her massive shells
into the enemy and when it was all over she was a complete wreck from stem to stern torn to pieces by big
guns,now do'nt forget aircraft had tried to sink her but failed at that
time .
Now I was also in at the Normandy landings on a Cruiser and our job with
the Battle'ships was first to knock out the shore batteries so that the landing craft could reach shore safe'ly and then the battle'ships were
only called upon by the army on shore
to use their long range big guns when
they needed them,I do'nt think German
Tanks would be much of a task fo a Battle'ship.
Now your Idea of smoke screens on the
Normandy beaches'well I hate to think
what Monty would have thought of that
or even the lads who would have had to
try and get through it,no smoke screen
are all very well when they are needed
out in mid ocean' say to protect a convoy .
As for the Normandy landings being a
near thing, in my opinion nothing was
more certain even though the weather
was against us every man jack was just
raring to go'this was it the beginning
of the end and every lad who landed on
those beaches was a hero and you should be proud of them.

Sinbadnick.

Archive List

This story has been placed in the following categories.

Royal Navy Category
D-Day+ 1944 Category
France Category
icon for Story with photoStory with photo

Most of the content on this site is created by our users, who are members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those of the 大象传媒. The 大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of any external sites referenced. In the event that you consider anything on this page to be in breach of the site's House Rules, please click here. For any other comments, please Contact Us.



About the 大象传媒 | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy