COLLISION COURSEWe are constantly being reassured
that flying is the safest form of transport. But with the growth of
the region's airports, and the presence of the RAF, is the North East
at greater risk from mid-air collisions? Inside Out investigates. The majority of the sky
above North East England is uncontrolled airspace where pilots can fly wherever
and however they please.
This makes the North East one of the most intensely used
areas for RAF training. Add to this the rapid growth in the number of flights
leaving from regional airports and you could have a recipe for disaster. Airprox | The
RAF has a large presence in the North East |
Inside Out has examined near-miss reports over the North
East between military and commercial aircraft since 2000. There have been 21 air proximity reports or, "Airprox"
as they are known. Investigators concluded that in most cases there was
no actual risk of collision, but in four instances the safety of the aircraft
was "not assured". In one incident, which they described as "the worst
near miss they had ever seen," a fighter jet shot up into cloud without
checking what was in its path. The jet passed within 100 feet of an SN Brussels flight
descending into Newcastle with 80 passengers on board. The fighter pilot gave no warning before the manoeuvre
and it was left to the civilian controller at Newcastle airport to warn
the SN Brussels pilot of the jet's movements. Out of control | Air
corridors provide extra safety for planes |
Although the fighter pilot's actions were described by
the RAF as "unwise", he did not break any rules. Near-miss investigators have called on the Civil Aviation
Authority (CAA) and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to urgently look at
how both military and commercial aircraft are allowed to share uncontrolled
airspace. Berwick MP Alan Beith is calling for urgent action by
the MoD and CAA to improve safety. Whilst Northumberland Councillor Peter Hillman, chair
of a committee of all councils affected by low flying, believes "it's
only a matter of time before there is an incident with catastrophic consequences."
Room for improvementUntil March 2003 Newcastle and Teesside Airports were
isolated from the UK's main airway system. Pilots had no choice but to fly though uncontrolled airspace.
Last year however, a new air corridor was introduced
connecting Newcastle to Manchester and the main UK airways system. Near misses | Pilots or air traffic controllers who feel the
safety of an aircraft has been compromised file an Airprox (air
proximity) report. These are investigated by the Airprox Board made up of military
and civilian aviation experts. They assess the risk according to what actually happened not what
might have happened: - Risk of Collision: An actual risk of collision existed
- Safety not assured: The safety of the aircraft was compromised
- No risk of collision: No risk of collision existed
- Risk not determined: Insufficient information was available
to determine the risk involved, or inconclusive or conflicting evidence
precluded such determination.
During the first six months of 2003 there were 32 Airprox incidents
in the UK involving civil air transport. 87% of these were assessed
as having no risk of collision. |
The corridor provides extra safety for planes heading
south. But those with destinations in Ireland, Scotland, Scandinavia
or Northern Europe still have to fly through uncontrolled airspace if
they are to take a direct route. Deviations cost more both financially and in journey
time, making airlines reluctant to alter routes and the CAA has no power
to force them to use the air corridors. Share and share alikeA new part-time airway linking Newcastle to Aberdeen
is being considered and the CAA and MoD are in discussions about the joint
use of uncontrolled airspace. During major exercises the MoD now has a military liaison
officer sitting with the Newcastle Airport air traffic controllers. This is unique in British air traffic and reflects the
nature of civilian and military aircraft both using the same airspace. The CAA insists that no near-miss is acceptable. Whilst these extra measures have been welcomed, Alan
Beith MP says new safety measures only seem to come in after a near-miss
and even then the new measures soon prove inadequate. |