Pakistan ship breaking
| Wrecking ball- breaking up ships in Pakistan |
One
of the most controversial debates on Teesside in recent years has centred on the
fate of the so-called ghost ships. The ships have been slowly rusting away
for the last two years as Able UK battles to convince officials they can break
them at the highest environmental standards. Inside Out investigates the
latest development and travels to Pakistan to discover the shameful truth about
how the British Government is guilty of double standards. Ghost ships It's
a familiar sight on Teesside - the shape of the ghost ships off the coast of Hartlepool. The
dismantling of these American warships would bring hundreds of jobs to Teesside
according to Able UK who hope to break the ships up. But critics of the
scheme have serious health and safety concerns. Shipbuilding is an integral
part of North East heritage - but it has a lethal legacy.
| Ship breaking
in a Pakistan yard |
Vessels from this era contained
asbestos and they're now reaching the end of their useful lives - so what does
the Government do with ships it no longer needs? At present the yard where
the ships are based is quiet as a grave. Able UK would normally have about
200-250 people working at this dry dock and it would be full of ships being recycled. But
it remains quiet because a decision on the future of the ships is still awaited. Scrapping
ships safely? In the meantime it seems the British Government is much
less choosey about how we scrap our own ships. Inside Out visited the the
Sir Geraint, a former warship renowned for her Falklands campaigns. She's
now being torn apart on a beach in Pakistan. The Sir Geraint was beached
at Gaddani just a week before we arrived and she's already barely recognisable.
She's being cut into large pieces, dragged on shore and then dismantled
further.
It's quick and basic, unregulated and dangerous. We spoke to
workers who expressed safety concerns. One said, "I've seen lots of
accidents and I've seen lots of people who've lost their lives." Another
claimed to have spent six months in hospital when he was injured. "In
Gaddani there is no safety but I am alive because of Allah," he says. Sir
Geraint is being dismantled by Bismilla Maritime Breakers. We asked its
owner whether he has a policy for dealing with hazardous materials like asbestos. "When
we find asbestos, we put it in a hole in the ground and cover it up," says
Ovais Shaukat. He claims that no asbestos has been found on this ship. But
the workers we spoke to said didn't know how to recognise asbestos. Ship
breaking in Pakistan So why do people bring ships to be broken in Pakistan?
"The UK has an environmental problem and a Greenpeace problem with the
demolition of these vessels," Ovais Shaukat. | Ship breaking - less regulation in Pakistan |
He
says that there is, "too much strict regulation in the UK with the breaking
of this vessel and it takes too much time and we have no hard impossible regulation
so we can meet the challenge of breaking this vessel." Having spent
the best part of the day at the yard we saw very little evidence of what we would
describe as health and safety, other than either equipment instructions or the
behaviour of the workers.
Peter Stephenson from Able UK is the man
behind the scheme to dismantle the Ghost ships in Hartlepool. We asked him
what he made of these working practices abroad:
"It's
sickening... it's very frightening. It's going to take years off these peoples
lives." He's convinced that the Pakistan ship could be
asbestos-contaminated:
"That looks to be fibrous asbestos in a fireproof
block. It's been broken and releases the fibres into the atmosphere."
So what would a Health and Safety official make of it in the UK?
"He'd have a nightmare - stop the site down immediately."
In
contrast, Peter says that Able UK's work is safe: "We've
been doing this work safely for 30 years. It's no different from doing a power
station or a platform from a refinery. "We've done 60-odd marine structures
from the North Sea oil and gas platforms. "We still recover in excess
of 98% of materials from them. There's no difference and there has been no problem
from our neighbours or the work we've done in that time." He
finds it frustrating to see the so-called ghost ships still sitting in Teesside
when he knows that other ships have been broken up in Pakistan:
"Words
fail me. It's so frustrating because they're doing so wrong over there. It's detrimental
to the environment and people are getting killed and injured. "And
it could all be done right here and it's good business for the area and we need
the jobs and it's good for the local economy." Best practice So
what's the Government's policy when it comes to disposing of our own ships?
It says that dismantling should be in line with what it describes as 'best
practice'.
Wally Mandryk from Lloyds Maritime Intelligence Unit says:
"If a ship has hazardous material on board, and many of them do, then
I think best practice would require these ships to be scrapped at facilities that
are licensed, and have resources and facilities to remove the materials before
they're fully scrapped." Surely that should rule out Gaddani
so how did Sir Geraint get there? The sale of Sir Geraint was handled by
a firm called Babcocks - a kind of estate agents for the Navy.
She wasn't
actually sold for scrap - but as a trading vessel - and this was already raising
eyebrows in shipping circles.
Wally Mandryk says: "My
great surprise was that this vessel was sold for trading in the first place. "The
ship was nearly 38 years old - in shipping terms that's an ancient vessel. "Very
few vessels, if at all, trade at that age. So it would be a reasonable assumption
that the vessel wasn't meant for trading and it was destined for the scrapyard
sooner or later." Whether or not Babcocks believed Sir
Geraint would be used for trade, they covered their backs by telling her new owners
she contained a large amount of asbestos, and made them sign a legal contract
governing her long term future. We've managed to see that contract and
it states that if the new owner of the Sir Geraint scraps her, or sells her for
scrap, they must do so in line with environmental best practice and health and
safety rules. Surely that should have ruled out the yard in Pakistan? Regency
Projects It's time for a look at who bought the Sir Geraint.
Regency Projects is a company incorporated in England for the purposes of breaking
ships.
They purchase ships, take them to the Far East, and sell them
to a breaker.
It's a company controlled by Mr Saleem Ali - he has a long
history of this type of work. | Dismantling the Geraint in Pakistan |
He
had several companies before. It's a little self contained operation at
the bottom of the shipping market. So why did the Government sell their
ship to a well known third world ship breaker? Regency Projects claim they
had nothing to do with Sir Geraint's dismantling.
They say they sold
her on to a third party, Malvern Shipping, and it was them who scrapped her.
Regency and Malvern coincidentally share the same office at this address
in London - and Regency continued to maintain the Sir Geraint until she was scrapped. Regency
Projects didn聮t want to be interviewed 聳 but they said information about
asbestos on Sir Geraint was passed on when she was sold and she was broken up
by a firm with a good reputation. So did the government fail to check up
on who they sold Sir Geraint to, or did they simply turn a blind eye? We'd
like to find out - but they also refused our request for an interview. Tightening
up contracts Surely the Ministry Of Defence can't be happy with the
way Sir Geraint was scrapped. In a statement they admitted that their contracts
should be tightened up to prevent a repeat of what happened to the Sir Geraint.
| What next for Teesside's ghost ships? |
So
it sounds like they realised they'd got it wrong.
Ahmad Saeed from the
World Conservation Union believes that, "I think they have more responsibility
than just selling that ship. "When they sell this ship they should
ensure that all the asbestos and hazardous materials should be taken off the ship." Roger
Symes thinks that the government was probably very happy just to get rid of the
ship: "Removing the asbestos from a ship such as this one is highly
expensive and would probably cost more than the value of the ship. "So
if they could get away without doing that it would certainly be in heir best interests
to do that." Double standards?
Ironically the next
generation of Navy logistics ships, Sir Geraint's replacement, are being built
here at Swan Hunter's on the Tyne. After that the company's order book is
empty. One of the hopes for keeping the yard going is in ship dismantling.
But before Swans or any other North East company can do that. they'll have
meet the rigorous health and safety checks demanded to deal with the hazards of
ship breaking.
But critics say these checks count for nothing when the
people doing this dangerous and demanding work are out of sight thousands of miles
away:
Pakistani environmentalist Ahmad Saeed says: "There
should not be any double standards. Whatever standards you follow in your country,
you should follow them in the receiving country as well." It
seems that the ongoing saga of the ghost ships is set to run and run...
Links
relating to this story:The
大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of external websites |