����ý

So, democratic South Africa has chosen to put its crucial trading relationship with China above its commitment to free speech and an old friend.

The decision was hardly a surprise. - and many others here - who called it "the darkest day", and a cowardly, hypocritical pandering to Beijing's bullying.

But what struck me most was the dispiritingly cheap way in which the exiled spiritual leader of Tibet was denied the opportunity to visit Cape Town, and attend Archbishop Desmond Tutu's 80th Birthday celebrations.

First President Jacob Zuma - not untypically - ducked the whole issue .

Then the South African Foreign Ministry chose simply to sit on its hands, rather than announce a decision, forcing the Dalai Lama to cancel his visit and enabling a foreign ministry spokesman to offer this breathtakingly disingenuous reaction: "Unfortunately he's decided to pull out of the trip, which is his decision..."

Diplomacy can be a delicate business. Discretion often works best.

But the Dalai Lama visa saga comes towards the end of a wretched year for South African foreign policy.

Somewhere, in Pretoria's , there is a principled commitment to neutrality, negotiated solutions and respect for the integrity of sovereign states.

And yet on each occasion, South Africa has appeared "have-it-both-ways" indecisive, reactive and incapable of articulating a clear position. .

So why not make that argument and take the criticism regarding the Dalai Lama on the chin?

South Africa's broad, inclusive government has helped to keep a fractious nation together as it emerges from the shadows of apartheid.

But it has also enabled individual ministries - and yes, presidents too - to hide behind a curtain of collective responsibility.

The result is lack of accountability and leadership that sometimes makes the rainbow nation look, at best, foggy.