大象传媒

A Himalayan river may be making Everest taller

Mount EverestImage source, Getty images
Image caption,

A new study says Mount Everest is about 15 to 50m taller than it would otherwise be, thanks to erosion from a river network

  • Published

Mount Everest is 15-50m taller than it would otherwise be because a river is eroding rock and soil at its base, helping push it upwards, according to a new study.

Loss of landmass in the Arun river basin 75km (47 miles) away is causing the world鈥檚 highest peak to rise by up to 2mm a year, University College London (UCL) researchers said.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a bit like throwing a load of cargo off a ship,鈥 study co-author Adam Smith told the 大象传媒. 鈥淭he ship becomes lighter and so floats a little higher. Similarly, when the crust becomes lighter鈥 it can float a little higher.鈥

Pressure from the collision of the Indian and the Eurasian plates 40-50 million years ago formed the Himalayas and plate tectonics remains the major reason for their continued rise.

But the Arun river network is a contributing factor to the mountains鈥 rise, the UCL team said.

As the Arun flows through the Himalayas it carves away material 鈥 the river bed in this case - from the Earth's crust. This reduces the force on the mantle (the next layer under the crust), causing the thinned crust to flex and float upward.

It鈥檚 an effect called the isostatic rebound. The research, published in Nature Geoscience, adds that this upward pushing force is causing Everest and other neighbouring summits, including the world鈥檚 fourth and fifth highest peaks, Lhotse and Makalu, to move upward.

鈥淢ount Everest and its neighbouring peaks are growing because the isostatic rebound is raising them up faster than erosion is wearing them down,鈥 fellow co-author of the study Dr Matthew Fox told the 大象传媒.

鈥淲e can see them growing by about two millimetres a year using GPS instruments and now we have a better understanding of what鈥檚 driving it.鈥

Some geologists not involved in the study said the theory was plausible but there was much in the research that was still uncertain.

Image source, Getty Images
Image caption,

The Arun River flows down from Tibet into Nepal and then merges with two other rivers to become the Kosi

Everest stands on the border between China and Nepal, and its northern part is on the Chinese side. The Arun river flows down from Tibet into Nepal and then merges with two other rivers to become the Kosi which then enters northern India to meet the Ganges.

It is a very high silt-yielding river given the steepness of the mountains it flows through and the force it has, allowing it to carve off so much rock and soil on its way.

But the UCL researchers say it most likely earned its real strength when it 鈥渃aptured鈥 another river or water body in Tibet 89,000 years ago, which in geological timescales is a recent event.

A Chinese academic, Dr Xu Han of China University of Geosciences, was the lead author in the study during a scholarship visit at the UCL.

鈥淭he changing height of Mount Everest really highlights the dynamic nature of the Earth鈥檚 surface,鈥 he said.

鈥淭he interaction between the erosion of the Arun river and the upward pressure of the Earth鈥檚 mantle gives Mount Everest a boost, pushing it up higher than it would otherwise be.鈥

The UCL study says the Arun river most likely gained the capacity to carve off an extraordinary amount of rocks and other materials after it captured another river or water system in Tibet.

Professor Hugh Sinclair with the School of Geosciences at University of Edinburgh, who was not involved in the study, said the underlying process identified by the UCL team was perfectly reasonable.

But, he added, the exact amounts and timescales of river incision (or how the river cuts downward into its bed and deepens its channel) and the consequent surface uplift of surrounding peaks had large uncertainties.

鈥淔irstly, predicting river incision of such large catchments in response to drainage capture (one river capturing another river or lake) is challenging,鈥 he said.

This uncertainty is something the authors have acknowledged in the study.

Secondly, said Prof Sinclair, the distance over which mountains uplift from a point of intensive localised erosion is extremely hard to predict.

鈥淗owever, even accounting for these reservations, the possibility that some of Everest鈥檚 exceptional elevation is linked to the river, represents an exciting insight.鈥