We've updated our Privacy and Cookies Policy
We've made some important changes to our Privacy and Cookies Policy and we want you to know what this means for you and your data.
Child benefit reform plans scrapped
- Author, Emer Moreau
- Role, Business reporter, 大象传媒 News
Top Stories
The government is scrapping a planned change to child benefit rules that would have allowed more parents to claim the payment.
Currently child benefit is withdrawn when one parent earns above a certain amount, but the previous Conservative government planned for claims to be based on household income from April 2026.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves made no mention of child benefit in her Budget speech on Wednesday, but the states that the proposed change would cost too much to implement.
The present system has been criticised as unfair as some households can claim the payment even if their total income is more than that of a single parent or a family with a sole high earner.
Top Stories
You can get child benefit if you are responsible for bringing up a child who is under 16, or under 20 if they stay in approved education or training.
Only one person can claim the benefit for a child. The payments are 拢25.60 a week for the eldest or only child, and 拢16.95 a week for younger children.
In April 2025, these will go up to 拢26.05 a week and 拢17.25 a week respectively.
However, payments are reduced once one parent starts earning at a certain level, known as the High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC).
Top Stories
In his last Budget in March, former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt raised the income level at which people have to start paying back part of the benefit from 拢50,000 to 拢60,000, and the level at which it is withdrawn completely from 拢60,000 to 拢80,000.
He also announced plans to move to a system where the HICBC is based on household income, not that of individuals, following a consultation.
But the Budget document published on Wednesday said: "The government will not proceed with the reform to base the HICBC on household incomes. This is because it would have come at a significant fiscal cost of 拢1.4 billion by 2029-30 if setting the threshold to 拢120,000-拢160,000, where no families would lose out."
'It was buried in the document'
Father-of-two David Stuart had welcomed Mr Hunt's proposal in March, saying it would make the system "fairer".
He said he was disappointed at the decision to abandon it, and at the fact it was "buried" in the document and not included in Reeves's speech.
David, who lives in Whitburn, West Lothian with his wife and two children, now earns more than 拢80,000 so is not entitled to any child benefit. His wife is a self-employed child minder and earns around 拢10,000 a year.
"We don't necessarily need the full payment," he said. "But another couple [earning more] can claim the full thing and we can't claim anything."
If he and his wife could claim part of the payment, it could go towards "putting money away for the kids", he said.
Laura Suter, director of personal finance at AJ Bell, said: "There鈥檚 no doubt that it would have been a huge administration task for HMRC to assess couples on their household income rather than sole income, meaning there is no easy fix."
By not going ahead with the change, though, "it means the system that punishes single earners will remain".
The Budget document also revealed that the government would allow employed individuals to pay their HICBC through their tax code from 2025, instead of having to submit a self assessment tax return.
Ms Suter said this would improve the "admin side" of child benefit payments, which has been criticised for being confusing.
鈥淗owever, that鈥檚 merely fixing one problem with the system when in reality it needed larger scale reform. The complications in the system mean it is underclaimed and not well understood."
Top Stories
More to explore
Most read
Content is not available