大象传媒

NSA surveillance exposed by Snowden ruled unlawful

  • Published
Edward SnowdenImage source, Getty
Image caption,

Edward Snowden wants to go back to the US but faces espionage charges if he returns

A National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance program has been ruled unlawful, seven years after it was exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The surveillance of millions of Americans' telephone records first came to light in 2013.

Now, the intelligence leaders who publicly defended the program lied.

And Mr Snowden has said he feels vindicated by the ruling.

He currently lives in exile in Moscow but, last year, expressed his wish to return to the US, where he faces espionage charges over his decision to go public.

鈥淚 never imagined that I would live to see our courts condemn the NSA鈥檚 activities as unlawful and in the same ruling credit me for exposing them,鈥 Mr Snowden said.

"And yet that day has arrived," he added.

This Twitter post cannot be displayed in your browser. Please enable Javascript or try a different browser.
The 大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Skip twitter post by Edward Snowden

Allow Twitter content?

This article contains content provided by Twitter. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as they may be using cookies and other technologies. You may want to read and before accepting. To view this content choose 鈥榓ccept and continue鈥.

The 大象传媒 is not responsible for the content of external sites.
End of twitter post by Edward Snowden

Top US intelligence officials had publicly insisted the NSA had never knowingly collected data from private phone records, until Mr Snowden exposed evidence to the contrary in 2013.

Following the revelation, officials said the NSA's surveillance program had played a crucial role in fighting domestic terrorism, including the convictions of Basaaly Saeed Moalin, Ahmed Nasir Taalil Mohamud, Mohamed Mohamud, and Issa Doreh, of San Diego, for providing aid to al-Shabab militants in Somalia.

But, on Wednesday, the Court of Appeals said the claims were "inconsistent with the contents of the classified records" and the program had violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The ruling will not affect the 2013 convictions.

鈥淭oday鈥檚 ruling is a victory for our privacy rights,鈥 the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement.

"It makes plain that the NSA鈥檚 bulk collection of Americans鈥 phone records violated the Constitution.鈥