´óÏó´«Ã½

Public access to trials involving serious sexual offences to be confined to close family members of complainant and the defendant.

Cross-examination of complainants to be pre-recorded and away from court - initially for vulnerable people but eventually extended to all complainants in serious sexual offences;

Publicly funded independent legal representation should be offered to complainants from the outset, up to but not including the trial;

Measures to combat rape myths and stereotypes, like suggestions that victims provoke rape by the way they dress or act;

New legislation to manage dangers created by social media;

More robust attitude by judges to prevent improper cross-examination about previous sexual history;

Steps to combat excessive delay in the judicial system;

Restructuring of the disclosure process;

Amend existing legislation ensuring juries do not bring sexual stereotypes into play;

No changes in the current law concerning the identity of the accused. They will be anonymous until they are charged, but from that point they will be identified;

Research projects should be commissioned on the prevalence, extent, nature and experiences of serious sexual offences;

Change needed to address the potential traumatisation of children and vulnerable adults during the judicial process;

Higher priority should be given to training people to be aware of the trauma suffered by victims, rape mythology, jury misconceptions and jury guidance;

All serious sexual offences should continue to be tried in the Crown Court with a jury, without the need for a gender quota or a not proven verdict. However, the pool of eligible jurors needs to be widened;

Alternative mechanisms, including an entirely victim-led concept of restorative practice, should be considered both inside the judicial system and parallel to it;

The appropriate statutory agencies should deliver an impact assessment into the Gillen Review that should include the cost of implementing the recommendations.