We've updated our Privacy and Cookies Policy
We've made some important changes to our Privacy and Cookies Policy and we want you to know what this means for you and your data.
Gillen review: Key recommendations
There are about 250 recommendations in Sir John Gillen's report.
Here are the 16 key recommendations:
- Public access to trials involving serious sexual offences to be confined to close family members of complainant and the defendant.
- Cross-examination of complainants to be pre-recorded and away from court - initially for vulnerable people but eventually extended to all complainants in serious sexual offences;
- Publicly funded independent legal representation should be offered to complainants from the outset, up to but not including the trial;
- Measures to combat rape myths and stereotypes, like suggestions that victims provoke rape by the way they dress or act;
- New legislation to manage dangers created by social media;
- More robust attitude by judges to prevent improper cross-examination about previous sexual history;
- Steps to combat excessive delay in the judicial system;
- Restructuring of the disclosure process;
- Amend existing legislation ensuring juries do not bring sexual stereotypes into play;
- No changes in the current law concerning the identity of the accused. They will be anonymous until they are charged, but from that point they will be identified;
- Research projects should be commissioned on the prevalence, extent, nature and experiences of serious sexual offences;
- Change needed to address the potential traumatisation of children and vulnerable adults during the judicial process;
- Higher priority should be given to training people to be aware of the trauma suffered by victims, rape mythology, jury misconceptions and jury guidance;
- All serious sexual offences should continue to be tried in the Crown Court with a jury, without the need for a gender quota or a not proven verdict. However, the pool of eligible jurors needs to be widened;
- Alternative mechanisms, including an entirely victim-led concept of restorative practice, should be considered both inside the judicial system and parallel to it;
- The appropriate statutory agencies should deliver an impact assessment into the Gillen Review that should include the cost of implementing the recommendations.
Top Stories
More to explore
Most read
Content is not available
{{rankTranslation}}