Home > Opinion > Disability Bitch > Disability Bitch: census and sensibility
Disability Bitch
Ouch's fearsome Bitch eats famous disabled people for breakfast. And then spits them out again. She tackles other controversial disability topics with all the subtlety of a hammer cracking a nut. Don't say we didn't warn you!
Disability Bitch: census and sensibility
24th March 2011
• The rest of the time, you can follow her on and .
I know this'll come as a surprise to you but ... I HATE THE CENSUS. I feel like I've filled out enough government forms in the last few years: benefit applications, NHS referral forms, you get the idea. Barely a month goes by that I'm not announcing my existence and laying myself bare to government officials in some form or other.
You'd hope there was some kind of exemption for Disableds when it comes to taking part in official headcounts: they have so much information about me, I don't think there's a civil servant in Whitehall who can't recite my medical history backwards.
Before you think about doing a spot of census-dodging, it seems officials are keen to use the opportunity to figure out how many disabled people populate our nation. Potentially helpful I think.
Disability issues come up in a couple of places, notably Question 23 -
'Are your day-to-day activities limited because of a health problem or disability which has lasted, or is expected to last, at least 12 months?'
Note that it's not a straightforward Yes / No question, it requires you to tick one of three boxes: Yes, limited a lot; Yes, limited a little; No.
Question 13 asks you how your health is in general - how nice of them to care! - and offers a range of incremental responses from 'Very Good' to 'Very Bad'.
Readers, I've been debating how I should answer these questions ever since the purple form plopped onto my doormat ... but imagine my surprise when I found my No-Legged friend hunched over it about to tick a big fat 'No' against the disability question.
"But Bitch," he replied, tears welling up in his eyes at the assumptions I was making about him, "the question asks if my day-to-day activities are limited, and they've made our local crazy golf course wheelchair accessible this year, so I don't think I'm limited at all, thank you very much!"
"What are you? One of these 'I don't consider myself disabled' nuance bunnies? I lunged for the stairlift and took the battery out. Then I balanced his wallet and keys on an upstairs windowsill, far from reach. "How about now?!" I asked him, and wrenched the pen from his hand and placed a tick in the 'Yes, limited a lot,' box.
He looked confused. "The thing is," he told me, "usually I tell the government I'm disabled but they still make me fill in a seventy-two page form detailing exactly what's wrong with me, and even after that send out a medical person to check I'm telling the truth."
Immediately I saw what he was getting at. The census allows you to determine for yourself whether you're disabled or not, without the usual kind of interrogation. I've written to David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith telling them I've found a way to save them squillions of pounds on the DWP budget: simply remove the complex assessments in favour of a straightforward Yes / No tickbox. After all, if it's good enough for the census it must be good enough for the DWP, right? I think the political mood is behind me on this one. I feel sure we're onto a winner.
Facebook / Twitter
Follow me on , 'like' me on .
Bookmark with...
Live community panel
Listen to our regular razor sharp talk show online, or subscribe to it as a podcast. Spread the word: it's where disability and reality almost collide.
More from the ´óÏó´«Ã½
All the latest news from the paralympics.
News and views for people who are blind or partially sighted.
Weekdays 12.40pm. Radio 4's consumer affairs programme.
Comments
I am still trying to figure out how those who have requested a census form in Braille or audio format are supposed to record their answers, quite honestly. My friend intends returning it with a supplementary sheet written entirely in Braille. I am quite happy with the incoming format of my form, I do not need it in sign language, Braille, audio or Welsh, however I can't write on it. D'oh!
Complain about this comment
The Disability question is, sadly, still conforming to the Medical Model of Disability. The Powers That Be obviously haven't moved forward in their analysis of what "Disability" is - or should be. They haven't grasped that society disables us by failing to include us, or plan with us in mind.
Complain about this comment
Is this kind of silliness not counterproductive, from a campaigning point of view?
It leads naturally to the assumption that you're complaining because we don't live in a fantasy utopia, rather than about actual problems that can plausibly be fixed.
Complain about this comment
The real silliness is that we have non-disabled people defining what we are, and how we must live our lives.
Complain about this comment
Chris, who is defining what you are or how you live your life, and how?
If you want help from the state, you're going to have to accept that you have to prove you need it. I absolutely believe that process could be improved, but pretending that it doesn't need to be there at all doesn't help anybody.
Complain about this comment
View these comments in RSS