大象传媒

A poker player who used a Victorian conjuring trick to win 拢7.7 million from a London casino left court empty-handed in 2017 after a court found he 鈥渢ook positive steps to fix the deck鈥�. But now judges have decided that the ruling in Phil Ivey鈥檚 case should be the test for dishonesty. Joshua Rozenberg explains how it works, while a gambler tells us that the courts have got it wrong.

Also this week, how do you ensure social distancing in a crowded detention centre?

And how is lockdown affecting the work of the civil justice system?

Contributors:
Dr Natalie Byrom, director of research at the Legal Education Foundation
Toufique Hossain, director of public law at Duncan Lewis Solicitors
Richard Munchkin, host, 鈥淕ambling with an Edge鈥� podcast
Professor David Ormerod, University College London

Researcher: Diane Richardson
Producer: Neil Koenig