大象传媒

Donald Trump has made some eyebrow-raising, some might say jaw-dropping, appointments to his top team. While a number of the appointees still need Senate approval, they all appear united by one thing 鈥� loyalty to Donald Trump.

Some consider loyalty to be a foundational virtue that is central to close friendships. Seneca, called it 鈥渢he holiest virtue in the human heart鈥�. It is more than simply 鈥渟upport鈥� 鈥� it suggests a duty to support 鈥渃ome what may鈥�. Others, however, think loyalty can enable bad behaviour, hide self-interest, encourage tribalism and threaten independent thought. If a close friend violates your ethical code, to what extent should you stay loyal to them? Or should you only be loyal to the person you thought they were?

Outside the realm of inter-personal relationships, loyalty to an institution like a company, the government, the armed forces or the Church can mean both loyalty to its principles and loyalty to its hierarchy. Here, calling out institutional wrongdoing is both an act of betrayal and loyalty, depending on how it is viewed.

Do we value loyalty in our personal and professional lives less than we did 50 years ago? And is that a good or a bad thing? Perhaps we just have a healthier perspective about who and what deserves our loyalty?

Is loyalty a virtue or a vice?

Chair: Michael Buerk
Panel: Mona Siddiqui, Tim Stanley, Inaya Folarin-Iman and Giles Fraser

Producer: Dan Tierney
Assistant producer: Ruth Purser
Editor: Gill Farrington