´óÏó´«Ã½

Explore the ´óÏó´«Ã½
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.


Accessibility help
Text only
´óÏó´«Ã½ Homepage
´óÏó´«Ã½ Radio
The ArchersRadio 4

Radio 4 Home

Contact Us

Like this page?
Send it to a friend!

Ìý
Latest Synopsis
Listeners
Parodies

Daniel and the Guilty Party

Jenifer Bennett is obviously a close student of the "William" books by .

williamDaniel sat in the drawing room at The Stables, scowling fiercely at the vicar while his mother was in the kitchen preparing tea. Daniel and the Reverend Janet Fisher enjoyed a mutual antipathy which was renewed at frequent intervals, since she was one of his mother's closest friends, and Daniel was, perforce, a regular church attender.

Miss Fisher would dearly have liked to have been capable of fond feelings towards her friend's only child, but her most strenuous endeavours in this direction were always defeated by Daniel's uncompromising truculence. She hoped wholeheartedly that Mrs Hebden-Lloyd did not perceive the unchristian shudder of distaste that always passed through her as she placed her hand on Daniel's unendearing head to bless him at Family Communion. In truth, Miss Fisher was not generally keen on the younger members of her flock (she felt that they did not take her seriously ), but in Daniel's presence she was often obliged to remind herself forcibly of Mark 10:14, whilst simultaneously reflecting that the Good Lord might not have urged His disciples quite so enthusiastically to "Let the little children come to me" had He been confronted with Daniel Hebden-Lloyd. Indeed, Miss Fisher might even have ventured to suggest that, faced with that child frowning menacingly from the front row at the Sermon on the Mount (as she was so often faced in church); by the time He had reached "Blessed are the merciful" Our Lord would have been sorely tempted to abandon the whole thing and go home.

Feeling the need to lighten the oppressive silence which had descended upon the room, Miss Fisher assumed a voice of unnatural brightness and asked, "Did you have a lovely time at your little cousin's birthday party, Daniel dear?"

"Yes."

It had, in fact been a wonderful party, but Daniel did not see any need to go into details with Miss Fisher. The celebrations had not had a promising start, partly because cousin Josh, and most of his friends were only five years old, and therefore beneath his, Daniel's, contempt; partly because his Uncle David and Aunt Ruth did not excel in the skills of providing party entertainment.
He quite liked being at their house, however, because no-one (unless Granny was there) told you to get off the furniture, or minded if your shoes were a bit muddy. This was a pleasing contrast to the regime which presided at home.

"'S only a little bit of dirt!" he would protest in vigorous astonishment, "I'm s'prised you c'n even see it. 'S only a bit untidy!" Daniel's parents invariably made an entirely unnecessary fuss about that sort of thing, in his opinion. "What's the point of havin' a cleaner, if there's nothin' for her to clean?" he would enquire, but they always failed to appreciate this wholly logical line of reasoning.

Josh's party, after its initial tedium, had livened up considerably with the arrival of his Uncle Kenton, who had bestowed upon the fortunate Josh the generous gift of a water-blaster, and to the delight of everyone under the age of twelve, had then proceeded to chase the party-goers around the garden with it. Daniel was now brooding enviously over the fact that his five-year-old cousin was the proud possessor of this magnificent weapon while he, aged seven and three-quarters was expressly forbidden to own any such thing.
"No dear, of course you can't have a water-blaster! Look what you did with that pen-knife Grandpa gave you!" his mother had exclaimed. "I can't think how Kenton could have been so irresponsible, giving Josh a thing like that! David was furious with him!"

Daniel's mutinous presence in the drawing room was occasioned by the fact that Mrs Hebden-Lloyd had discovered (from that tell-tale, Jamie Perks) the nature of his involvement in the escape and subsequent disappearance of Mrs Snell's goat.

He'd tried to explain that it wasn't his fault. "I didn' mean to leave the paddock gate open! I jus' felt sorry for the poor ole goat. Anyone could see it didn' want to be tied up. I jus' thought I'd let it move about a bit. How was I s'posed to know it'd run off like that?" Anyhow, Mrs Snell was silly to get all worked up about an ole goat. It would pobably have died soon anyway. Really he'd been doing her a favour because she wouldn't have the bother of burying it now. She'd probably be grateful to him when she'd thought about it a bit. "Anyone oughter be jolly well grateful they'd got rid of an ole goat. Stands to reason!"

His mother, however was unmoved by this argument, and had confiscated the pen-knife (a good one with four blades, a corkscrew and a thing for taking the stones out of horses' hooves) with which he had committed the offence. She was at this moment wondering how best to approach the delicate matter of apologising to Mrs Snell.

Second (and final) part

More parodies - from Agatha Christie to Damon Runyon



<<Back



About the ´óÏó´«Ã½ | Help | Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookies Policy
Ìý