What is an eruv? This article explains what an eruv is, how it is constructed, why some Jews feel eruvs are necessary and why they are controversial for some.
Last updated 2009-07-23
What is an eruv? This article explains what an eruv is, how it is constructed, why some Jews feel eruvs are necessary and why they are controversial for some.
Britain's first, and biggest, eruv was created in February 2003. The eruv has a boundary 11 miles long and encloses an area of 6.5 square miles. It covers Hendon, Golders Green and Hampstead Garden Suburb, together with parts of Childs Hill, Cricklewood, East Finchley, Finchley and Mill Hill.
A second eruv was created in Edgware in 2006 and construction began on a third, in Borehamwood, in March 2007.
An eruv is an area within which observant Jews can carry or push objects on the Sabbath, (which lasts from sunset on Friday to sunset on Saturday), without violating a Jewish law that prohibits carrying anything except within the home. There are over 200 eruvs (or eruvim) in the world.
An eruv must be 'completely enclosed'. The area is not enclosed by building a special wall round it - most of it is enclosed by existing natural boundaries like railway lines or walls. What matters is that the area is completely enclosed by boundaries that conform to Jewish law. The North West London eruv has been recognised as valid by the London Beth Din - the Orthodox Jewish religious court.
An eruv mixes the boundary between the area within the home and the area outside it. The result is that within an eruv Orthodox Jews can follow the same rules on the Sabbath that they would in their homes.
Jewish law says that Jews must not carry any item, no matter how small or for whatever purpose in a Reshus HaRabim (public domain - outside their home) on the Sabbath, even if they are allowed to carry them within their home.
Pushing things is also forbidden - so families with small children (who would use prams and pushchairs) or the physically disabled (who would use wheelchairs) are effectively housebound. They can't even go to the synagogue to fulfil their religious duties on the Sabbath.
But both carrying and pushing are allowed inside an eruv because it's regarded as within the home domain. So in an eruv Jews can:
An eruv therefore makes it easier for Jews to follow the spirit of the Sabbath by making it enjoyable and fulfilling, without breaking the rules that keep it holy.
An eruv doesn't permit Orthodox Jews to carry things that cannot be moved at all on the Sabbath, such as mobile phones or pens or wallets, or carry things for use after the Sabbath.
Nor does an eruv permit Jews to do things that break the spirit of the Sabbath - such as going shopping or swimming, riding a bicycle or playing football in the park, or gardening.
An eruv is created using physical features, like walls and hedges, railway lines and roads, to completely enclose an area of land.
The open spaces between the existing features are filled in by erecting poles with nylon fishing line (or wire) strung in between. The poles and lines are regarded as forming doorways in the boundary - the poles are the sides of the door and the lines are the lintel across the top.
The flimsier parts of the boundary are inspected every week to check that the boundary is intact and that none of the fishing line or poles has fallen down.
In ancient times the rabbis decided that if several houses were built round a closed courtyard, then they could be considered a single giant house, and so things could be carried between them. The continuous boundary of an eruv effectively turns a large area into a sort of imaginary courtyard within which anyone is allowed to carry objects or push prams or wheelchairs; activities which would otherwise be forbidden on the Sabbath.
So an eruv converts an area in which there were once many individual Jewish homes into one big home, shared by one big Jewish family.
There are certain things that may invalidate an eruv:
There is nothing to stop non-Jews entering the eruv area either on the Sabbath or during other times.
Not everyone thinks an eruv is a good idea. It took many years of campaigning before the North West London eruv could be built. The objections came from both Jews and non-Jews. Reform and secular Jews generally disapprove of eruvs - they don't see any need for them. Orthodox and Conversative Jews approve of them.
Ultra Orthodox Jews are very strict about the rules for an eruv and often refuse to recognise its validity for legal reasons. For example, The Union of Orthodox Hebrew Congregations (UOHC) - which includes synagogues in north-west London - has claimed that there are "serious halachic (Jewish law) problems" with the North West London eruv that make it invalid.
It's a 'device for evading the strict rules' of the Sabbath: supporters say that it's a creative use of Jewish law to make the Sabbath better.
It's visually intrusive: supporters say that it's usually very hard to see the poles and lines at all.
It claims a public area as a private area: supporters say it's purely symbolic and does not make the area any less public.
It takes over a public space for a religious purpose: this argument is particularly strong in the USA - eruv supporters reject this argument saying it fails because the public space is only changed for Orthodox Jews; it remains unchanged for non-believers.
It breaches human rights by giving a religious Jewish role to the walls and fences of non-Jews: supporters say that the symbolic role that the boundary has for a Jew does not exist for non-Jews, therefore their rights are not affected. The non-Jew retains the right to demolish the wall, or do anything else they want to it.
It breaches the human rights of non-Jews because they are forced to pass through symbolic Jewish structures when they go in and out of the eruv: supporters say that the symbolic role that the boundary has for a Jew does not exist for non-Jews, therefore their rights are not affected.
It is religiously divisive and may therefore promote anti-Semitism: supporters say that it's no more religiously divisive than synagogues or Jewish schools.
It creates a symbolic ghetto, reminiscent of past persecutions: supporters either disagree, or say that it doesn't matter.
Non-Orthodox Jews argue that it encourages separateness and discourages assimilation: supporters probably agree, but don't see the problem.
Jews will be encouraged to move into an area with an eruv: supporters argue that this argument should be dismissed as anti-Semitic.
It's an archaic idea: supporters say that following ancient laws and traditions is part of Jewish continuity and a vital part of the survival of the Jewish people.
´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.