Sound Index Data
I'm producer of the Sound Index, and it's great to see it being so well received by people , on the and in .
Obviously, I'm biased - but I genuinely believe that it's an exciting and innovative product.
However, in response to about not opening up the data, this is purely because it's currently a public service beta and, as it was intended as a proof of concept, has an end date of mid July.
Only if a longer-term future is secured for the Sound Index would we fully open up the RSS or other data. We don't want development to take place around data which could potentially come down and we would also need to shift to more a robust, longer-term server model to support this.
However, we have recently launched a widget of a top ten, both of the generic Index, and the customisable My Index, which does allow elements to be shared and embedded.
The Sound Index trial has been co-funded by both ´óÏó´«Ã½ Public Service and , as both were interested in investigating the and processing listing model. All running costs have been split between both , whose is used to crawl and analyse our partners' sites, and who render the data and produce the front-end. The costs have included ongoing development as well as maintenance and hosting.
It is currently owned by ´óÏó´«Ã½ Switch, the new ´óÏó´«Ã½ offer for teens, due to the way in which teens consume and discuss music online and generate buzz about tracks and artists. There will be more functionality within the site added in the next couple of weeks, allowing more interaction and adding more value to the Index. However, we are keenly monitoring all feedback as the Sound Index trial is just as much about learning as it is about innovating - so please do leave a comment.
Beth Garrod is Producer, ´óÏó´«Ã½ Switch.
Comment number 1.
At 3rd Jun 2008, SteveFarr wrote:Further to Mike Butcher's criticisms, if the ´óÏó´«Ã½ does not open up its data how are we to judge its true accuracy and reliability?
True this may only be a proof-of-concept project at the moment. However ´óÏó´«Ã½ endorsed charts have real commercial influence in the music industry so it is important that there is some clear understanding of how the data is compiled. For example how does the ´óÏó´«Ã½ weight each particular source?
Over 1000 artists/tracks how does the ´óÏó´«Ã½ ensure integrity of the basic artist/track information is correct and that it is indeed matched to the correct underlying information. Given that different artist/track information has search-terms similar or in common how does this not get confused?
How did the cover for the movie "2046" get confused with the artist The Ting Tings?
We know that advertisers bid for high search rankings which in turn distorts our search results. If this Top 1000 were to become a real ´óÏó´«Ã½ endorsed product like the Top 40 Music Chart how could the ´óÏó´«Ã½ prevent its deliberate manipulation by the music industry?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 3rd Jun 2008, Marc Ridley wrote:It's a great idea, but to be worth anything it has to be accurate. If releasing the data can help prove the data is accurate, then it should be released. But the ´óÏó´«Ã½ has enough influence and reach to ensure it gets the right companies and technologies on board.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)