Digital Media Anywhere
You may have already read the where I lay out my vision for the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s digital future.
It should be no surprise that digital media are at the heart of the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s online strategy.
Audio/visual is the soul of the corporation and will form the backbone of a vastly improved bbc.co.uk in the years to come. It's sometimes easy to forget that we have made substantial progress over the last 12 months from a technical and editorial perspective.
The broad adoption of our embedded media player for on-demand short-form, long-form and simulcasting are great examples. Our podcast offering is growing in popularity fast and ´óÏó´«Ã½ iPlayer continues to go from strength to strength.
What I am most proud about is the . I am sure you have seen the list somewhere, so I will go straight to what is new.
Today, we are announcing that in partnership with we are building a platform-neutral download client.
Using Adobe Integrated Runtime (), we intend to make ´óÏó´«Ã½ iPlayer download functionality available on Mac, Linux and Windows for the first time later this year. Whatever platform you use, you'll now be able to download TV programmes from the ´óÏó´«Ã½ to watch later - on the train, in the garden, or wherever you like.
Given our obligations to rights-holders and the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust, these programmes are protected with DRM, but in a way that shouldn't affect your enjoyment of our programmes, whatever platform you've chosen.
We are also announcing that in partnership with , and , we have already enabled over-the-air iPlayer download functionality for the Nokia N96 mobile phone.
For the ´óÏó´«Ã½, this is a first and yet again shows our continued commitment to give our audiences convenient access to our programmes wherever they are. As other advanced mobile phones become available, we will be looking at making the service available there as well.
While we are making great progress, I wonder if there is a more fundamental way for the ´óÏó´«Ã½ to contribute to making "media anywhere" a mass market reality. Getting your favourite programmes on a wide variety of devices is still too difficult for the average consumer. Device makers define what media platform functionality and user experience to support and mostly those are not consistent - which leads to trouble for consumers.
I have asked ´óÏó´«Ã½ Research to explore whether we should create/drive an open industry standard for IP-delivered Media On The Go. There is no fixed timeline for the delivery of Research's results at present, but when we have an update we will let you know. In the meantime, I'd be interested to hear what you think.
Erik Huggers is Director, ´óÏó´«Ã½ Future Media & Technology.
Comment number 1.
At 13th Oct 2008, FishFingers wrote:This is excellent news!
I only discovered Adobe AIR a few weeks ago but some of the applications that have been developed are extremely responsive and effective. The eBay desktop app springs to mind as a fine example.
All I have to hope for now is that the same technology is adopted by other broadcasters for their VOD efforts.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 13th Oct 2008, AnInsomniac wrote:Can anyone tell me whether this will include the Playstation 3? Thanks.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 13th Oct 2008, johndrinkwater wrote:Can you explain how your sense of platform-neutral doesn’t align with everyone else’s perception?
You’re not neutral if you only reach three (Operating System) platforms out of many (OS and Architectures). If Adobe are planning on bringing AIR to the lesser platforms, then that is fine but otherwise I still can’t see how you’re fulfilling your promises to the Trust.
‘However, we remain committed to ensuring that iPlayer download functionality is available to all audiences, not just Microsoft users.’
Note *all*.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 13th Oct 2008, supernaut76 wrote:Another person wondering how AIR is considered "platform neutral". It's described on as part of the "Adobe Technology Platform"
Does it run on PS3, Wii or XBox360? No. Does it run on iPhone, Symbian, Android? No.
It just gives us another way to access content from devices where we can already access content (albeit only via streaming)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 13th Oct 2008, _Ewan_ wrote:Given our obligations to rights-holders and the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust, these programmes are protected with DRM,
They have head of Freeview, right? What is the point in imposing harmful DRM on the iPlayer when anyone who wants a DRM free copy can either take it from the broadcast version, or in the case of many shows, torrent a copy that someone else has taken off air?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 13th Oct 2008, Darren wrote:these are all questions...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 14th Oct 2008, Chris Mossom wrote:For people asking about iPlayer on PS3, the 2.50 update out soon (read later this week) supports Flash 9. Meaning that www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer will stream to it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 14th Oct 2008, Chris Mossom wrote:@johndrinkwater
I'm interested to know what you would do with iPlayer if you were in charge? What platforms would you like to see it on?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 14th Oct 2008, chilloutzone wrote:"or wherever you like"
I am interested in whether the ´óÏó´«Ã½ is considering "their" internet as the world wide web..... with or without boundaries. Adobe are a US business, and therefore the use of the product obviously gives income to them. Yet still the ´óÏó´«Ã½, and the law, regard the web as a place where borders are the same as countries. Hence the use of GeoIP. It will be quite a shame if in future the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s customers... UK license holders, are locked out of the content as soon as they travel to Europe. After all, the web should make no censorship based solely on physical boundaries. An alternative of MAC addresses could allow this to flourish, in the same way as I agree to your license to post comments, perhaps I could also be afforded access if I register my equipment as an opt in with the overall License Fee. With or without DRM this would be helpful.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 14th Oct 2008, linuxcentre wrote:Eric, you say "Whatever platform you use, you'll now be able to download TV programmes from the ´óÏó´«Ã½ to watch later - on the train, in the garden, or wherever you like."
and
"Given our obligations to rights-holders and the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust, these programmes are protected with DRM, but in a way that shouldn't affect your enjoyment of our programmes, whatever platform you've chosen."
However, Adobe clearly stipulate in their EULA (as they also have with their flash player):
"You will not use any Adobe Runtime on any (a) mobile device, set top box (STB), handheld, phone, web pad, tablet or Tablet PC (other than Windows XP Tablet PC Edition and its successors), game console, TV, DVD player, media center (other than Windows XP Media Center Edition and its successors), electronic billboard or other digital signage, internet appliance or other internet-connected device, PDA, medical device, ATM, telematic device, gaming machine, home automation system, kiosk, remote control device, or any other consumer electronics device, (b) operator-based mobile, cable, satellite, or television system or (c) other closed system device"
So how can I watch any of this ´óÏó´«Ã½ digital restrictions management TV output on my Linux set-top box or converted games console? I run Linux/Freevo on an old Xbox at home and I'm sure others use XBMC on their set-top boxes or just run plain Linux on a handheld PC, or tablet PC. None of these can legally run AIR. So I can say, 'YES', this will, in a rather large way, affect the enjoyment of the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s programmes.
Why use AIR when it basically has such a blatant pro-Microsoft bias? Will the ´óÏó´«Ã½ not put pressure on Adobe to remove these unhelpful restrictions?
And what about the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s obligations to license payers?
I wonder if Apple will be putting AIR on the iPhone?
I also wonder if Adobe will help the free/open source software community with documentation on their proprietary RTMP protocol (used by the ´óÏó´«Ã½ on their flash based iPlayer) so that the flash version can be watched without having to use closed-source proprietary tools such as Adobe's flash player or AIR?
- Phil Lewis
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 14th Oct 2008, cooksey87 wrote:Wow, people are insanely picky. Platform neutrality doesn't mean every single platform. Should the ´óÏó´«Ã½ invest time and money in trying to get the iPlayer to work on windows 3.1? No, of course not. And if you're still going on about DRM, grow up, they don't have a choice, because they don't own all the rights to all the programmes. I for one think this is excellent news, and look forward to using it on my macbook.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 14th Oct 2008, ixalon wrote:@ClintEastman: Yep, if true, it's great news about Flash 9 on the PS3. I'm quite surprised considering Adobe's reluctance to license anything other than Flash Lite to hardware manufacturers.
If the implementation is complete (i.e. Sony has licensed the various additional codecs etc.) it should make viewing iPlayer on the PS3 a much better experience.
Then if they finally get round to fixing their JavaScript implementation I can finally shut down PS3iPlayer.com, redirect everyone to bbc.co.uk/iplayer and save myself some cash :-)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 15th Oct 2008, Charax wrote:From the Trust's "Platform Neutrality" review:
"we remain committed to ensuring that iPlayer download functionality is available to all audiences, not just Microsoft users."
Note two key phrases: "Download Functionality" and "All Audiences" - that means that using AIR does *not* satisfy the trust's goals due to the limitations stipulated in the AIR EULA (as stated above)
It also means that the 2.50 update for the PS3 doesn't apply because it only enables streaming, not downloading.
No one solution is going to fulfil the Trust's stated goal, and while AIR is a decent start, only if it is used alongside other content delivery systems will they be able to provide download functionality to all users.
As for the DRM issue, I don't mind too much, so long as the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are open and clear about what they're doing, and it's effects on your system - don't install hidden crap on my computer, don't leave stuff running after the iPlayer closes and if you HAVE to do these things, warn me about them first! EA are getting sued in the US for the silent install of SecuROM on customers' computers, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ should take note of that.
Still, I'm happy that the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are starting to take non-Windows platforms seriously.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 16th Oct 2008, Tiggs wrote:What about the XBox 360? The iPlayer is all well and good, but as the 360 itself supports downloadable DRMd expirable WMV content, why is there still no news about this platform?
Especially as I'm sure I'm not alone in having an XBox 360 connected to a nice sized TV in front of an armchair, and a computer connected to a somewhat smaller screen in front of a computer chair...
Guess where I want to watch TV content.
As _Ewan_ said above:
"...or in the case of many shows, torrent a copy that someone else has taken off air?"
Well, the thing about those sorts of files (whether torrented or legit) is that they are supported by the XBox 360. (Note: Supported from an external drive, without having to switch on a computer. Very important point to me)
But even with a completely suitable technology platform, the iPlayer means I have to either watch it at the computer desk or unhook my computer from where it usually sits to watch stuff through my real TV.
I'm no fan of DRM, but can accept it as a necessary evil AS LONG AS it doesn't actively interfere with normal viewing habits. So please, Xbox Live Marketplace. Don't make the wrong solution (torrents) the best option.
On the brighter side, I'm glad to hear a Mac/Linux downloadable option is on the cards. Although I'd be curious to know how DRM playback will be handled on Linux, where there isn't necessarily a common default playback software across all distributions, and where people are a lot more adamant about being able to use their player of choice. (VLC all the way for me, incidentally...)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 16th Oct 2008, cyclomedia wrote:I'm one of the pesky consumers who downloads tv shows (usually in batches over sunday night) then watches them on my Xbox as and when i feel like it. I might watch 8 episodes of one series in a row or stick fairly close to the original (UK) broadcast time.
This came about because of the combination of a hectic life and being terrible at remembering to even set the video! But in this digital age I guess this makes me a pirate, despite watching for free (via the internet) what i could already watch for free (via the freeview box and video).
I think iPlayer is great so far, and lets me legally time-shift the bbc and I've been wishing for a true Open Media platform to come along and combine every man and his dog's Flash-embedded web site.
I have some requests, however
1. do not mandate drm or time restrictions, by all means support it, but do not force it
2. Be truly open to contributors, not just to the media giants but to humble home grown set ups - by all means require them to go through a NewYouTube type startup but the startup has to be allowed a chance.
3. Use open, free and well documented protocols (for the non-drm content) so that users and developers arent forced to pay monopoly corporations for access (non drm)
What terrifies the media giants more than anything is not pirating but the rise of the independent producer and they will fight to mandate licencing fees, membership cartels and geographic exclusivity for all players, even those who pay for, produce and market their own content.
iPlayer2 could be the dawn of the new media revolution and the 20th century "broadcasters" have no greater right to control it than any one else.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 16th Oct 2008, matt carey wrote:How about AppleTV support, mooted back in January? No chance of using AIR for that either...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 17th Oct 2008, dennisjamal wrote:For Adobe Air, please ensure you include the following!
.alwaysInFront = true;
Thanks!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 19th Oct 2008, bryces wrote:I second the comments about the XBox 360. Hopefully the ´óÏó´«Ã½ are making every effort to talk to Microsoft to ensure that a version of IPlayer is included in the New XBox Experience due out next month - but I'm not holding my breath.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 27th Oct 2008, RickCurran wrote:I would love to see AppleTV support too, I use my iPod Touch hooked up to my TV all the time to watch content but I would buy an AppleTV straight away if I could also watch iPLayer content on it!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 30th Oct 2008, Chris Bunnett wrote:"Should the ´óÏó´«Ã½ invest time and money in trying to get the iPlayer to work on windows 3.1? No, of course not. "
Yes, they should! This is a service paid for with my money and I, as a User, should be entitled to the same service as every other User. As a Mac User, I fundamentally object to the fact that my ´óÏó´«Ã½ viewing is relegated to streaming only, so I can't watch my programmes on the train unless I buy a windows machine or an iPod! I already have a portable computing device. We have been promised this the whole year and still nothing...!
I have told everyone I can, I will no longer support the licence fee on the basis that the ´óÏó´«Ã½ doesn't think that I'm important enough to care about. Let them get out there and try to make it in the real world, like any commercial organisation.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 30th Oct 2008, Tiggs wrote:One thing that occurs to me is that the ´óÏó´«Ã½ might be in a bit of a no-win situation.
Getting proper downloadable content onto the Mac, Linux, PS3 and Xbox 360 platforms would probably be a monumental undertaking.
Putting law and ethics to one side for a moment, realistically the iPlayer is competing with torrented copies. Unless they're 100% certain they can compete successfully and conveniently with torrented content, it might be hard to either get it working or release an actual timeline.
The problem is that they obviously can't actually tell people to torrent in the meantime. (nor should they) But they have to privately know that it's the option that many are using in the meantime. So they know that, to some people the lack of an iPlayer client for their system isn't actually a barrier to catching up on shows. Or that they use this instead of moving the PC or using a streaming option.
But for those of us who would really like an official and legal method of catching shows we missed, it rather sucks.
I still continue to hold out for an Xbox 360 version, though. It's attached to my TV, in front of the armchair. That is where I watch content, not at the computer desk.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 8th Aug 2009, Chankya wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 9th Sep 2009, felicioo wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 10th Oct 2009, lora_appleton wrote:It just gives us another way to access content from devices where we can already access content (albeit only via streaming)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)