Radio With Pictures
Post categories: Radio
| 09:47 UK time, Wednesday, 17 June 2009
There's been a few things that (to our shame) we've missed on the Internet blog recently. One is ´óÏó´«Ã½ Radio (or Audio & Music)'s trial of "Visualising Radio".
5 Live's interactive editor Brett Spencer introduced the trials that started with the Simon Mayo show earlier this month.
Guy Strelitz looks at some of the technical detail on the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Radio Labs blog.
This week's Ariel, the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s staff newspaper, sent their reporter Adam Bambury behind the scenes to have a look. This is what he found.
Nick Reynolds is editor, Social Media, Central Editorial Team, ´óÏó´«Ã½ Online.
A man sits hunched over a mixing desk, deftly cutting between camera feeds of people talking - a scene that occurs in many a ´óÏó´«Ã½ television studio. The difference here is that this man is deep in the bowels of 5 Live. Welcome to the future of radio.One of many possible futures, admittedly, but a future that's been receiving a lot of praise from listeners turned viewers of the Simon Mayo show, the first programme on the receiving end of the second phase of FM&T and A&M interactive's latest visual radio trial. Just don't call it tv for radio.
'This is visualisation of radio,' clarifies Brett Spencer, interactive editor for 5 Live. 'We're not making television, but we are adding more visuals to the radio programme, perhaps to attract a younger audience that may want to consume things in a more multimedia environment.'
You can see the results online, via a shiny new 'visualisation console' that listeners can Âaccess via the 5 Live site (see box). What is attracting the most attention, however, is the console's 'studio cam', which utilises the four video cameras already built into the 5 Live studio.
Far from a bog standard webcam, this is a high quality streaming video feed that displays radio as it happens. The visuals are mixed live to capture the action, while another member of the interactive team sources images for news stories and studio guests. 5 Live has filmed radio Âbefore, as has Radio 4 with its recent 'Today TV' experiments, but this is the first time it has been done in this way through the new console.
On the first day of the trial, which began at the start of this month, a holding card was displayed during any non-Mayo items, such as news, traffic and toilet breaks. A raft of complaints Âensued, and now proceedings within the studio are revealed in all their mundane glory.
The addition is not without its challenges, like needing to get visual clearance from all guests (no-one has refused so far), but judging from incoming messages during the show - ranging from 'what a babe' newsreader Justine Greene is to the scruffiness of the crew - listeners evidently relish the opportunity to take a peek behind the scenes.
Presenter Simon Mayo agrees: 'The audience seem to like it - I take no notice of it at all. I've had to start wearing make-up which is a bit strange, but I haven't started playing to the camera yet.' "
The Simon Mayo show will be visualised until June 19, when the trial switches to Chris Moyles (R1, Monday-Friday), Switch (R1, Sunday), Material World (R4, Thursday), and The Hub (6 Music, selected sessions) until the end of June, when the technology goes before the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust.
Comment number 1.
At 17th Jun 2009, digitalradiotech wrote:Radio may have pictures, but why have the higher quality live Internet radio streams been delayed for an entire year? Is it because the ´óÏó´«Ã½ is biased towards DAB and biased against Internet radio by any chance?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 17th Jun 2009, Nick Reynolds wrote:digitalradiotech - you're off topic. No more please.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 17th Jun 2009, digitalradiotech wrote:Why is it off topic?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 17th Jun 2009, Nick Reynolds wrote:The post is not about DAB or radio streams. Consider this a red card.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 17th Jun 2009, KernowChris wrote:I find the experiment interesting and wonder as bandwidth becomes available via 'Canvas' and other related technologies whether the service if approved could be carried as a matter of course via the 'extended' EPG that these services will offer.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 17th Jun 2009, digitalradiotech wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 17th Jun 2009, digitalradiotech wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 17th Jun 2009, Neil wrote:Get the sound right before worrying about vision,I'm with digitalradiotech on this one.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 17th Jun 2009, RedRedRobin wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 17th Jun 2009, richardwhiuk wrote:Can someone tell me why every so often I hit a link which sends me to the old style of ´óÏó´«Ã½ News?
Apologies if this isn't the correct place to post this.
Richard
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 17th Jun 2009, Neil wrote:Who seriously wants pictures with crap audio?
About time ´óÏó´«Ã½ got priorities right
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 17th Jun 2009, dave wrote:I tried the 5live website but couldn't find the shiny new 'visualisation console'.
Sounds just like watching a webcam of someone doing radio show, have I missed something ?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 17th Jun 2009, Professor Techno wrote:Good Afternoon
Nick,seeing as Radio is being shown live on ´óÏó´«Ã½ Television,does that mean we can discuss radio on the Points of View ´óÏó´«Ã½ Television board?
Regards
Techno
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 17th Jun 2009, halfamo wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 17th Jun 2009, Neil wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 17th Jun 2009, Topher Allan wrote:You're going to have a hard time convincing the majority of people that 'radio with pictures' is anything other than television.
What would be more useful would be metadata accompanying the radio stream. Current song and artist are obvious ones. Hyperlinks and phone numbers - if I'm listening on my computer or a mobile phone, it would be nice to be able to click these directly rather than having to listen to the audio and type them out manually.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)
Comment number 17.
At 17th Jun 2009, Neil wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 17)
Comment number 18.
At 17th Jun 2009, Green Soap wrote:What utter rubbish. If it has pictures, it's television.
And why this continual "Younger Audience" drivel. How about appealing to ALL audiences?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 18)
Comment number 19.
At 17th Jun 2009, dave wrote:"What would be more useful would be metadata accompanying the radio stream. Current song and artist are obvious ones. Hyperlinks and phone numbers... "
Isn't this just updated RDS ?, the problem with that is no-one bothers to provide the data on lots of shows.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 19)
Comment number 20.
At 17th Jun 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:#16
"You're going to have a hard time convincing the majority of people that 'radio with pictures' is anything other than television."
Indeed, isn't that how the ´óÏó´«Ã½ first introduced that new fangled technology called 'television'?! One of the nice things about radio is that there is no distractions for either presenters or listeners, ask people about this mornings edition of "Today" and they will - for example - talk about the interview with Field Marshal Erwin Rommel's driver, ask about ´óÏó´«Ã½ Breakfast time and the chances are many will just remember what the presenter was wearing...
I must say that of late, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ really is showing just how low it's stooping in both quality and editorially and these 'lets make TV out of radio' stunts (and this blog) has been no exception - the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust really must start reminding the ´óÏó´«Ã½ of it's core purpose and remit.
I Trust that no one will find this comment off topic either, far to much censorship from the ´óÏó´«Ã½ of late...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 20)
Comment number 21.
At 17th Jun 2009, Franky wrote:Hmm, guess I'm going to get censured and accused of being off topic.
Nick is it fair to say once you've blogged and are done with it you dont go back. In essence the blog is abandoned?
Because you appear to be either not answering or abandoning blogs. ie POV
Complain about this comment (Comment number 21)
Comment number 22.
At 17th Jun 2009, Nick Reynolds wrote:Franky_Herbert - you are as you well know off topic. This post is the place to discuss POV. And I refer you to my previous comment here.
Any more off topic comments from you on this thread will be moderated out.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 22)
Comment number 23.
At 17th Jun 2009, Professor Techno wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 23)
Comment number 24.
At 17th Jun 2009, niclaramartin wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 24)
Comment number 25.
At 17th Jun 2009, niclaramartin wrote:Also, Brett Spenser says
"perhaps to attract a younger audience that may want to consume things in a more multimedia environment.' "
OR, Radio on it's own is not "pritty icky" enough to keep the attention of the young. They need over-stimulation of their senses to be able to follow what is being said.....with pictures and video streaming, and speaking yoof innit. Youtube's got a lot to answer for.
Next, we'll have a webcam and CCTV streaming Nick making a cup of coffee/tea, and ferreting about in the biscuit tin for a Caramel Log. Because, we NEED to know these things. It's to improve our knowledge/appreciation/understanding of ´óÏó´«Ã½. Or, simply pretentious dressing up of Televisuals - god that's an old word (haha) as "Visualising Radio"
OR, ´óÏó´«Ã½ could maybe make GOOD QUALITY programmes which folk might want to listen to, without the cartoon effects.
"Visualisation Console", Haha, this is where I would use a (rollseyessmiley), and (slapshandtoforeheadsmilely), if ´óÏó´«Ã½ blogs did smileys. Wonder how long you lot spent thinking THAT one up?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 25)
Comment number 26.
At 17th Jun 2009, niclaramartin wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 26)
Comment number 27.
At 18th Jun 2009, halfamo wrote:Touchy aren't we?
I'm sorry, but I seem to be missing the point of something here!
"Radio with pictures"...What's to get excited about? ´óÏó´«Ã½ television
has been doing this since 1932! Instead of wasting time and effort on this rubbish, please fix the stuff that IS broken. I would give a list, but it would get binned for being off-topic.
The world's gone mad!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 27)
Comment number 28.
At 18th Jun 2009, Green Soap wrote:Seems this blog is being moderated by the Iranian Government!
Please explain quite how Radio with pictures is not Television.
It seems someone has been blue sky thinking this one, to come up with utter nonsense.
Time for the Beeb to come up with what the customer wants, and not what they give us.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 28)
Comment number 29.
At 18th Jun 2009, Professor Techno wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 29)
Comment number 30.
At 18th Jun 2009, Neil wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 30)
Comment number 31.
At 18th Jun 2009, _marko wrote:RE: "The world's gone mad!"
Can we all agree the date that the world went mad?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 31)
Comment number 32.
At 18th Jun 2009, dave wrote:The day they dreamt up blogs, twitters, and the visualisation of radio.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 32)
Comment number 33.
At 18th Jun 2009, Franky wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 33)
Comment number 34.
At 18th Jun 2009, Franky wrote:28. At 00:48am on 18 Jun 2009, Tengsted wrote:
Seems this blog is being moderated by the Iranian Government!
Please explain quite how Radio with pictures is not Television
______________________________________________________________
Well they cant. It IS TV
Complain about this comment (Comment number 34)
Comment number 35.
At 18th Jun 2009, Franky wrote:31. At 6:25pm on 18 Jun 2009, _marko wrote:
RE: "The world's gone mad!"
Can we all agree the date that the world went mad?
32. At 7:24pm on 18 Jun 2009, dave wrote:
The day they dreamt up blogs, twitters, and the visualisation of radio.
_________________________________________________________________________
Yes most definetly Blogs
Complain about this comment (Comment number 35)
Comment number 36.
At 19th Jun 2009, henryhallsdanceband wrote:Radio is sound - and that's it. Brand and Ross behaved as they did because they are TV people on radio but behaved as if they were on TV. All the twitter, blog rubbish is just that - it adds absolutely nothing and drives listeners away. Good way to lose my support of the licence fee.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 36)
Comment number 37.
At 19th Jun 2009, neuro wrote:I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. The ´óÏó´«Ã½ should be encouraged to experiment with the technology around their services. If they had been discouraged from the start, we'd all still be listening to the Home Service and watching ´óÏó´«Ã½ tv in glorious 405-line black-and-white-o-vision.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 37)
Comment number 38.
At 19th Jun 2009, Green Soap wrote:@37
There's experimenting, and there's re-inventing the wheel.
I know what so called "Radio with Pictures" falls in to.
Remember the James Whale Radio Show?......
Complain about this comment (Comment number 38)
Comment number 39.
At 19th Jun 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:#37
"I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. The ´óÏó´«Ã½ should be encouraged to experiment with the technology around their services. If they had been discouraged from the start, we'd all still be listening to the Home Service and watching ´óÏó´«Ã½ tv in glorious 405-line black-and-white-o-vision."
But why re-invent the wheel, if they want to make television out of the "Today" programme (for example) why not just televise it on the ´óÏó´«Ã½ News Channel, or were ever. At a time when the ´óÏó´«Ã½ is having to make cuts in other areas, as others have said, wouldn't it be better to make one new technology work well rather than a hundred new technologies work only mediocre? As for radio and the Home service etc, I think you'll find that the ´óÏó´«Ã½ did little to improve their radio services until the 'Pirate Stations' showed the way, the ´óÏó´«Ã½ merely played catch-up!...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 39)
Comment number 40.
At 19th Jun 2009, halfamo wrote:If the ´óÏó´«Ã½ wishes to experiment, I have no objection. However the experiments should be of some import. Perhaps they could experiment with making the rolling news channels, News 24 and 5Live, the "Newsnight" of their genre, rather than the "Sun gossip column". They could experiment at targeting programmes at demographics other than "yoof". They could experiment in having some programmes on 5Live that aren't phone-ins.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 40)
Comment number 41.
At 22nd Jun 2009, cping500 wrote:bit late I know but what about the opposite... "Hearing the TV"... as exemplified by Bottom Line on ´óÏó´«Ã½ News and Radio 4. (with separate Websites pod casts and the TV on the iPlayer (for a year!!)) The production values are informal but not quite as much as Radio 5's (which I note actually plays it both ways. with ´óÏó´«Ã½ News)and the add ons are provided by the OU (open2.net) But it does pose a question: this time 'why on TV?'
Another example of a different vision is the ´óÏó´«Ã½ orchestra's series of concerts with Radio 2 which have been televised or visioned (?) and offered after the concerts but with no add ons
To work all of these have to act as radio first then add the pictures.
I hope the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Trust is not confused by all these experiments when it comes to make the decision next month and avoid demanding as some of the audience clearly expect all the contributors in Dinner Suits
I think 'Bottom Line' is just about right for now.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 41)
Comment number 42.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 42)
Comment number 43.
At 20th May 2010, magic1001981 wrote:I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. The ´óÏó´«Ã½ should be encouraged to experiment with the technology around their services. If they had been discouraged from the start, we'd all still be listening to the Home Service and watching ´óÏó´«Ã½ tv in glorious 405-line black-and-white-o-vision.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 43)