"It's clear that Burgess was a louche, hard drinking, dishevelled, outrageous man."
Post categories: ´óÏó´«Ã½ Archive,Ìý´óÏó´«Ã½ Online
| 15:31 UK time, Tuesday, 18 August 2009
So says ´óÏó´«Ã½ Historian of the picture that emerges of Cambridge spy Guy Burgess from previously unreleased documents published by ´óÏó´«Ã½ Archive. The memos, letters and expenses claims are from Burgess's early career while employed at the ´óÏó´«Ã½.
While the documents touch on things like Burgess's unhappiness with his salary and the questioning of his expenses, they also paint a picture of a long-gone much more genteel office world of tea trolleys and unreturned library books.
´óÏó´«Ã½ Archive's other new collection, The Cambridge Spies, covers the gradual exposure of the Cambridge spies over four decades through a fascinating selection of TV and radio programmes.
- Times Online:
- Today Programme:
- See all the ´óÏó´«Ã½ Archive Collections here.
Paul Murphy is the Editor of the Internet Blog.
Comment number 1.
At 18th Aug 2009, ReginaldJeeves wrote:"It's clear that Burgess was a louche, hard drinking, dishevelled, outrageous man."
Good. We need more people like him employed by the ´óÏó´«Ã½, instead of the "namby-pamby leftest wenches" we have now.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 18th Aug 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:#1
"Good. We need more people like him [Guy Burgess] employed by the ´óÏó´«Ã½, instead of the "namby-pamby leftest wenches" we have now."
I really am not sure if that was meant to be a highly ironic comment or just a comment from someone who doesn't actually know who Guy Burgess was (not completely clear from the blog above if people don't already know, "Cambridge spy" doesn't really tell half the story)!...
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 19th Aug 2009, ReginaldJeeves wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 19th Aug 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 20th Aug 2009, hackerjack wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 21st Aug 2009, ReginaldJeeves wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 22nd Aug 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 22nd Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 22nd Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 23rd Aug 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)
Comment number 11.
At 23rd Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 11)
Comment number 12.
At 23rd Aug 2009, TV Licence fee payer against ´óÏó´«Ã½ censorship wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 12)
Comment number 13.
At 23rd Aug 2009, kettleclad wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 13)
Comment number 14.
At 2nd Sep 2009, wwdlu101 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 14)
Comment number 15.
At 30th Mar 2010, U14402580 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 15)
Comment number 16.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 16)