Paul Murphy| 11:35 UK time, Wednesday, 30 September 2009
Senior ´óÏó´«Ã½ R&D Engineer not only presented a paper at but also won the for his contribution 'Compatibility Challenges for Broadcast Networks and White Space Devices'. Mark kindly agreed to share the paper on the Internet blog (download links at the end of this post) and also to write an introduction aimed at the layperson (and this blog's editor!). Mark writes:
"My paper discusses proposals to allow license exempt use of TV spectrum by WiFi-like devices known as White Space Devices (WSDs). This would enable improved wireless networking but there is a significant risk of interference to our Freeview services. The paper looks at the technical parameters for WSDs to manage the interference problem. Researchers in the United States are leading the work in this area and have been applying considerable influence to Ofcom. The US companies are less concerned about DTT interference, however, as only 10% of the population receive TV through a conventional antenna; 90% have cable or satellite. In the UK, Freeview is used by over 70% of the population, so interference would be a major worry."
The TV spectrum should be used for TV, NOT for Wi-Fi or other devices. That's the problem with Ofcom, they keep selling of OUR (the UK public's) TV spectrum.
Keep the TV spectrum for HIGH QUALITY TV. We will need as much spectrum as possible for a high quality Freeview HD with as many high quality (high bitrate) HD channels at full HD. Do not sell of our spectrum for WiFi or other similar uses.
And please use any 'white space' TV spectrum for improved/higher quality TV broadcasts, and please don't risk causing ANY interference to TV broadcasts by using the TV spectrum for non-TV uses.
Staff from the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s online and technology teams talk about ´óÏó´«Ã½ Online, ´óÏó´«Ã½ iPlayer, and the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s digital and mobile services. The blog is reactively moderated. Posts are normally closed for comment after three months. Your host is Eliza Kessler.
Links to conversations and stories about the ´óÏó´«Ã½'s online activities. The links on this blog and its stream are chosen by Eliza Kessler and Nick Reynolds. Follow on Twitter.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comment number 1.
At 30th Sep 2009, HD wrote:The TV spectrum should be used for TV, NOT for Wi-Fi or other devices. That's the problem with Ofcom, they keep selling of OUR (the UK public's) TV spectrum.
Keep the TV spectrum for HIGH QUALITY TV. We will need as much spectrum as possible for a high quality Freeview HD with as many high quality (high bitrate) HD channels at full HD. Do not sell of our spectrum for WiFi or other similar uses.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 30th Sep 2009, HD wrote:And please use any 'white space' TV spectrum for improved/higher quality TV broadcasts, and please don't risk causing ANY interference to TV broadcasts by using the TV spectrum for non-TV uses.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 30th Mar 2010, U14402580 wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 12th May 2010, U14460911 wrote:All this user's posts have been removed.Why?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 3rd Sep 2010, Dekiweb wrote:This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the house rules. Explain.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)