FA avoids major doping row
The appears to have avoided a serious confrontation with Britain's drug testing authorities over their new doping regulations, approved by the FA Council last week.
As previously discussed here, it seems the potential threat of losing £26m of grass roots funding has been enough to sharpen minds at the FA, and that their new regulations, as yet unpublished, will allow for a testing pool which will include at least some England squad level players, as had demanded.
I gather there are still discussions taking place, but the main issues are now resolved, and UK Sport aren't about to announce the FA's suspension from the drug testing programme.
The FA's position will be welcomed by the rest of elite sport in Britain, who're obliged to comply with the same Code, in order to receive public funding.
It'll also be well-received in the Montreal offices of Wada, who've been struggling with over the issue of code compliance, particularly over the composition of testing pools and the acceptance of individual responsibility by those in the pool to provide their whereabouts for an hour a day, 365 days a year.
If a leading association like England is agreeing to the principle, surely that's now set an international standard, which Wada won't be slow to point out to other potential waverers.
Comment number 1.
At 9th Jul 2009, The Almighty Handshake wrote:I don't think the FA were left with much choice this week after a premiership footballer was suspended after failing a drugs test. UK Sport got exactly what they needed to reinsforce there point. I don't understand what the issue is myself. Being a footballer is a privlige, therefore they simply have to appriciate that although they may see it as an intrusion of privacy. They are being paid thousands of pounds a week, millions a year, to what so many millions of people would do for free. So there inconviniance is something i have no time for. The FA shouldn't of taken so long to agree to the regulations anyway. I think its fortunate that they are asking for the cream of our footballers to partake and not all of them.
As for Sepp Blatters comments, It still bewilders me how he is in charge of world football. They guy doesn't have a clue.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 10th Jul 2009, Graham Newsom wrote:If correct this is good news although the devil will be in the detail. It will be interesting to see how solid the FA's resolve is when some of our top footballers begin to miss tests.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 10th Jul 2009, hackerjack wrote:The issue is not with the FA, it's with the regulations that are simply wrong.
They are treaating athletes in all sports like prisoners. There was a perfectly good working model already in place for years with regards to testing procedures, THAT was never the problem.
The real problem is moving technology, that is the only reason that w still have competitors gettign away with it.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 10th Jul 2009, Yossarian wrote:Poster No. 1 - The footballer in question was Paddy Kenny, a goalkeeper from a Championship side.
But you're right about Blatter ;^)
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 10th Jul 2009, sounesstablishment007 wrote:Is there such a thing as grassroots football in England? Don't see too much evidence of it in the Premier League, with all these foreign players, managers and owners. You'd be better off spending all the money on drug-testing....
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)
Comment number 6.
At 10th Jul 2009, 1homerj wrote:Hackerjack has the nub of it, the rest of the world must be laughing at the British, with our over-reliance on petty rules and regulations when we let the big misdemeanors go unpunished.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 6)
Comment number 7.
At 11th Jul 2009, IvIarky wrote:I do have some sympathy for the Premier League footballers because in this day and age it's difficult to trust one organisation to have a database of where they will all be at a specific time, of a specific day, all year round. Despite what they're paid I don't think it's fair that they have to divulge family holiday plans in the close season in order to keep some jobsworth happy. And let's face it, it won't be too long before there's a newspaper headline that a laptop was stolen from a WADA member of staff with all the details on.
It just seems typical of British regulations to attempt to go that little bit too far in order to appear to be leading the rest of the world. They still haven't realised that the rest of the world actually think we're anally retentive.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 7)
Comment number 8.
At 11th Jul 2009, Graham Newsom wrote:It's a system that has been working effectively in Olympic sport for a number of years and will be managed by UK Sport (on behalf of WADA) in this country.
UK Sport have improved their communications with sportsmen significantly in the past couple of years and the system allows those subject to testing to update their whereabouts online, by text or by telephone. This is all about ensuring those sportsmen and women understand that the system is there to protect them from those who may want to win by unfair means. In a sport where the rewards are so high I can't believe that there will never be a problem - that view would be totally naive.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 8)
Comment number 9.
At 11th Jul 2009, Geijo lets go wrote:What angers me about the proposal is that it's "a selection" of players who are selected, including "some" England players.
The criteria for picking players should be fair to everyone. For example:
* All internationals
* All top flight players
* All professional players who have played in the top flight
* All players earning more than £x
* All professional players.
It shouldn't be left to WADA, the FA or anyone else to cherry pick random players, or on a potentially politically motivated basis.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 9)
Comment number 10.
At 11th Jul 2009, SnoopDonnyDog wrote:I don't see why football should have to enforce these drug test rules. It will always be the usual sports who have drug problems, becuas there is no skill element in these sports: athletics, swimming, cycling and weightlifting. I suppose it would be un-PC to only target these sports, so everyone else has to suffer. As for Paddy Kenny, I didn't realise lard was a banned substance.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 10)