´óÏó´«Ã½

´óÏó´«Ã½ BLOGS - Magazine Monitor
« Previous | Main | Next »

Your Letters

17:35 UK time, Monday, 9 July 2012

Re: 10 Things, number 5. No, no, no! Agggghhhhhh!
Martin, Hemel Hempstead, UK

Wimbledon final watched by 16.9m. Please can you take 1 off that stat? I may have been in the same room as TV and 2 viewers (husband and son) but I was reading my book waiting for the tedium to end. Except when I nipped out to descale the kettle and get all those ukky bits out from the bottom of the dishwasher.
Aqua Suliser, Bath

"A TV audience of almost 17 million watched Andy Murray as he lost the Wimbledon men's final against Roger Federer." My Goodness! How many would have been watching if he'd won?
Rob Falconer, Llandough, Wales

Nominative determinism strikes again. What a great name for a lottery winner. (in Roger Federer Wimbledon triumph wins Oxfam £100,000).
Mark Gray, Reading, UK

Paul, Friday's Letters, simply reply asking them to politely re-send the documents to your late mother's new 'address', dont forget to include the plot number (a brief description of the headstone may assist the postman as well).
David, Liverpool

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.