A diplomatic breakthrough with Iran?
Could the long struggle between Iran and the international community almost be over? The issue of the country's nuclear plants has been rumbling away for six years now, but some people close to talks in Vienna are suggesting that a deal might be ready by tomorrow.
The idea is not a new one. Under the proposed agreement, Iran would send most of its enriched uranium to Russia, where it would be boosted to a higher level and made into fuel rods. The rods would then be returned to Iran unsuitable for use in a weapons programme.
Not only would such a deal sooth foreign concerns about what was happening to Iran's uranium but it would also be a good commercial project for Russia. The returns appear so attractive that France has been insisting that it too be part of the re-processing scheme.
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit µþµþ°äÌý°Â±ð²ú·É¾±²õ±ð for full instructions. If you're reading via RSS, you'll need to visit the blog to access this content.
The International Atomic Energy Authority is insisting that a deal be done by Friday. If it happens, tensions could be considerable reduced but there will still be some important outstanding issues.
IAEA inspectors are due to travel on Sunday to the facility near Qom which the US/UK and France alleged last month is a secret nuclear enrichment facility that has been hidden from international supervision. They are hoping to find out whether the Qom plant is associated with other undeclared facilities. These inquiries could produce a new confrontation with the Iranian authorities.
It is also clear that Iran wishes to retain its ability to enrich uranium on home turf and will not put all of its fissile material onto the planned reprocessing scheme. So there could still be scope for argument about whether some of it was being diverted into a weapons programme.
If however the Iranians agree to reprocessing in Russia and close IAEA supervision of their facilities then we might be witnessing a diplomatic breakthrough. The Obama administration will then hail it as a victory for positive diplomatic engagement.
Comment number 1.
At 22nd Oct 2009, streetphotobeing wrote:Lets hope but never trust, NEVER.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 22nd Oct 2009, dennisjunior1 wrote:Mark Urban:
Could the long struggle between Iran and the international community almost be over?
I hope it would be over...I am going to wait to see the news...When it happens...
=Dennis Junior=
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 22nd Oct 2009, bookhimdano wrote:given a british diplomat said the whole iran thing was to divert attention away from Gaza and settlement building what will they do now?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 22nd Oct 2009, barriesingleton wrote:IF IRAN MAVE LEARNED ANYTHING FROM US CHRISTIANS, WHAT YOU SEE WILL NOT BE WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO GET.
Politics - Monopoly at home and Globopoly elsewhere - it is all games. Treaties, peace agreements, trade deals, finance: all rigged by devious operators. Remember the 'lying abroad for one's country' diplomat gag?
Anyway - I sure Jesus would want America and UK to open their war laboratories to 'them' before telling them what they have to do. "Invite done unto yourselves what you would do unto others" - wasn't that it? Well if he didn't say that - he should've.
SPOIL INTERNATIONAL GAMES
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 23rd Oct 2009, barry white wrote:Diplomacy is such an art that I reckon in the west most countries have lost the skills in the last few years.
And the west historical record with the middle east (a convenient way of description) has not been great has it?
I wait with interest to see what happens
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)