Sherlock dismisses suggestion he is to be made a peer
Liberal Democrat adviser and donor Neil Sherlock has just dismissed the suggestion in my blog yesterday that he is about to be made a Lib Dem peer.
"I think that one peerage in our house is enough at present!" he tells me.
Comment number 1.
At 26th Oct 2010, JunkkMale wrote:So... asking and confirming before 'suggesting' not an option then?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 26th Oct 2010, stevie wrote:what about the exe's? let's not be too hasty here......
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 27th Oct 2010, meninwhitecoats wrote:Morning Michael
You are one of the few live blogs today - at this rate you will be getting into double figures everyday.
I see Ivan Lewis is trying to hold an investigation into the ´óÏó´«Ã½ license fee agreement - is the 16% cut to the £3.6bn income why all the politics blogs are being closed down early?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 27th Oct 2010, meninwhitecoats wrote:Evening Michael
I gather you & Nick Robinson are both Man U supporters and have Oxford PPE's [as do half the coalition/opposition front benches] - you must know the current generation of politicians pretty well. At least Paxo went to the other place.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)
Comment number 5.
At 2nd Nov 2010, Will71 wrote:These stories of people rumoured to be up for a peerage makes me wonder what qualifies you for a peerage? Surely you should have done something significant and of the greater good of the British public? Surely you should have something further to offer that can be enhanced by your position as a peer? The suggestion that Mr Sherlock may have been up for a peerage for being an adviser to a political party that has never been voted into power, and happens to donate money to said party is ludicrous. Our servicemen and women in Afghanistan/Iraq are doing more for their country than these people. What is going on?
Complain about this comment (Comment number 5)