´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

The Suffolk Murders: An Arrest

Post categories:

William Crawley | 16:02 UK time, Monday, 18 December 2006

_42364851_stephens_myspace_203.jpgIs this the face of a serial killer? Tom Stephens, a 37-year-old supermarket assistant by police investigating the murder of five women in the Ipswich area. As I write, he is being questioned by detectives at an unnamed police station in Suffolk. Only time -- and the continuing investigation -- will tell if Tom Stephens is the man who killed Gemma Adams, Anneli Alderton, Tania Nicol, Paula Clennell and Annette Nicholls. Without prejudice to that investigation, we can only hope that an end is in sight for the families of those young women whose lives were taken from them.

I spoke with Cari Mitchell from the English Collective of Prostitutes on Sunday morning and she was adamant that the police need to do more to protect female sex workers. She says the police do not investigate reports of violence against prostitutes as carefully as they investigate other crimes -- the life of a prostititute, she maintains, is undervalued, and violent clients are left to abuse other women. Getting away with violence may encourage some clients to get even more violent.

412 detectives, uniformed officers and other staff were involved in this investigation -- drawn from 36 police forces. Cari Mitchell believes those resources would not have been necessary if more was done to protect these women in the first instance: through further legalisation of prostitution and also a more responsible response by the police to early reports of violent crimes. This is a serious debate for serious people. Whether or not Tom Stephens is eventually prosecuted, it's a debate we need to have.

Comments

  • 1.
  • At 06:18 PM on 18 Dec 2006,
  • wrote:

Give him a life sentence.

  • 2.
  • At 06:27 PM on 18 Dec 2006,
  • Jonathan Gibson wrote:

Roberto, wouldn't it be polite to have a trial first?

  • 3.
  • At 06:55 PM on 18 Dec 2006,
  • wrote:

Would that the UK had the death penalty. :-(

  • 4.
  • At 11:56 PM on 18 Dec 2006,
  • pb wrote:

nice one JG ;-)

  • 5.
  • At 08:33 AM on 19 Dec 2006,
  • Gee Dubyah wrote:

JW

How many guilty people executed make up for one innocent put to death.

Would you feel the same if it was your son wrongly executed.

Capital punishment is barbarism.

  • 6.
  • At 12:17 PM on 19 Dec 2006,
  • Mark wrote:

From what I've seen of lambs and sheep, you can look at any flock and you will find a mob mentality. They just arrested a second suspect for questioning. One of them is undoubtedly the wrong guy. It wouldn't be the first mistake Britain's police have made. The last one in the news was a Brazilian kid they mistook for an Arab terrorist. They shot him dead on the subway. First the execution, then the trial. Who says there is no death penalty in Britain? What next, bring back the Tower and the Axman? At least it would make a good show for American tourists and much more memorable than a bullfight. Isn't that a familiar justification for keeping the Royal Family too, a good tourist attraction?

  • 7.
  • At 10:45 AM on 29 May 2007,
  • Simon Cussonay wrote:

Fascinating that 5 months later, this "article" is still on the ´óÏó´«Ã½website whereas in the meantime another man is now standing trials for murder.
And what about the "treatment" of Robert Murrat in the Madeleine McCann case.
At least in France I don't have to pay for the ´óÏó´«Ã½ licence fee.

  • 8.
  • At 12:38 PM on 01 Jun 2007,
  • Joe Jones wrote:

Have you apologised yet to Tom Stephens?

Has he been made aware that he could sue for defamation?

  • 9.
  • At 07:07 PM on 22 Jun 2007,
  • Mark 2 wrote:

You have to feel sorry for this guy, another bloke entirely will now be on trial for the murders but Stephens' (presumably incorrect) status as a suspect will be on the web forever. Lucky we don't have the death penalty, eh?

  • 10.
  • At 02:05 AM on 23 Jun 2007,
  • galen wrote:

Can you guys not read what this article says? It says things like: without prejudice to the actual investigation, whether not not tom stephens is prosecuted, etc. the article represents a moment in time when this suspect was arrested. nothing here accuses him of guilt. this is the nature of an in-time blog, or any online article. it was accurate when it was written and its perfectly valid that it should remain on this site now.

This post is closed to new comments.

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.