´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

Sulu is solo no more

Post categories:

William Crawley | 14:39 UK time, Tuesday, 20 May 2008

240x320.jpgThe actor , famed for playing Star Trek's Mr Sulu (and, more recently, Kaito Nakamura in the hit series Heroes) Brad Altman, his partner of 21 years. The couple's announcement comes days after California's ruled that the state's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional -- an historic victory for . (Read the relevant case documents online ).

The state of Massachusetts already allows same-sex marriage, and a number of other states, including California, have introduced legislation to allow gay couples to register as civil partners. The California Supreme Court decision means that same-sex marriage will now be possible in two of the 50 states in the union.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton responded last week to the California decision -- with practically the same comment: "Barack Obama [insert Hillary Clinton] has always believed that same-sex couples should enjoy equal rights under the law, and he will continue to fight for civil unions as President. He respects the decision of the California Supreme Court, and continues to believe that states should make their own decisions when it comes to the issue of marriage."

We wait to see how John McCain will seek to capitalise on the California case in his bid for the presidency. He has previously spoken out against "activist judges"; and, on the face of it, this is precisely the kind of scenario that might well enrage him, since the seven judges of the California Supreme Court (in a 4-3 decision) have voted to overturn a ban on gay marriage that was approved by 61 percent of California voters. Judges would have me point out that they are not pollsters: their job is not to assess public opinion, but to interpret the law accurately and fairly.

California's summed up the basic moral commitment underlying his court's decision: "An individual's sexual orientation - like a person's race or gender - does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold rights." Are those the words of an "activist judge"?

I wonder what the man who appointed the Chief Justice to the bench would think: Ronald Reagan.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Well the people would vote in many a freedom-crushing measure, so which is more important, democracy, or honouring rights and freedom? I think democracy is great, but the government should be limited to the task of protecting rights and freedoms, and in this case the democratic government was negligent in that regard. The court's decision was the right one, and here in California there are a lot of happy people this week.

    By the way, George Takei (pronounced Tuh-kay) is a regular guest and announcer on the Howard Stern show which I listen to religiously; he's a genuinely nice man with a big heart - several months ago, Stern sidekick Artie Lange 'came out' to George Takei in an entertaining segment that you can watch on YouTube (it's so great).

  • Comment number 2.

    It's a completely bogus right. The right is to marriage which means a man and woman - that's what marriage means. If a homosexual man wants to marry a woman he is perfectly free to do that - there is nothing preventing him, no descrimination. This ruling renders marriage in California utterly meaningless.

  • Comment number 3.

    Smasher says: "This ruling renders marriage in California utterly meaningless."

    No, it defines its meaning further. Marriage stays pretty much the same under the new law, actually. Is your imagination so lacking as to preclude you from seeing a marriage with same sex partners with the same dynamics as a marriage between opposite sex partners? If so, observe that George Takei's partnership with 'Bradders' (as he refers to him while making love) has already lasted 21 years and is, in all respects other than the sex of the partners, an identical arrangement to a normal heterosexual marriage.

  • Comment number 4.

    John_Wright.

    You were doing so well until you mentioned 'normal' hetrosexual relationships.

  • Comment number 5.

    I'll never hear the phrase "beam me up Scotty" in the same light again

  • Comment number 6.

    antisyzygy- Wouldn't you describe heterosexual marriage as 'normal'?

  • Comment number 7.

    Do you live in NI, John_Wright?

    Hope not, as I pride myself in being the only NI Stern fan.

Ìý

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.