In the not-so-bleak mid-Summer
Astronomers researching the 'Christmas star' say , not December, and that he was a Gemini, not a Capricorn, as previously believed.
Post categories: Religion
William Crawley | 15:29 UK time, Friday, 12 December 2008
Astronomers researching the 'Christmas star' say , not December, and that he was a Gemini, not a Capricorn, as previously believed.
Jump to more content from this blog
For the latest updates across ´óÏó´«Ã½ blogs,
visit the Blogs homepage.
You can stay up to date with Will & Testament via these feeds.
Will & Testament Feed(ATOM)
If you aren't sure what RSS is you'll find useful.
These are some of the popular topics this blog covers.
´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.
This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.
Comment number 1.
At 12th Dec 2008, nobledeebee wrote:A story similar to this appears every Christmas. A star/bright light in the sky cannot guide you to a specific house because its position will appear to shift as you travel across the earths surface. It's a nice wee story for four year olds though!
Complain about this comment (Comment number 1)
Comment number 2.
At 12th Dec 2008, Jason_Kennedy wrote:Not that I like to question other people's science, but...
I have a piece of software that pretty much does what they say there's does - shows where stars, planets etc. were/are from anywhere on earth at any time. According to my software, Jupiter and Venus combined in the year 1BC June 17 in Leo, but it was below the Horizon in Bethlehem! I really hope this is my software making this error and not them being really stupid - for no other reason that I would feel greatly sorry for them!
But I guess when you can make the simple mistake of "*Three* wise men" you capable of anything!
Jason
Complain about this comment (Comment number 2)
Comment number 3.
At 13th Dec 2008, Jason_Kennedy wrote:Haha, in my rush out the door I realise I've made quite the simple error myself of "you" instead of "you're". Ejit. :D
Complain about this comment (Comment number 3)
Comment number 4.
At 13th Dec 2008, nobledeebee wrote:Well spotted jason54, the Bible does not say there were "three" wise men.
Complain about this comment (Comment number 4)