´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

Cameron gives Rowan some advice

Post categories: ,Ìý

William Crawley | 12:41 UK time, Saturday, 6 February 2010

pg-2-cameron-pa_312547s.jpgDavid Cameron has told the Church of England that it should follow the lead of the Conservative Party and become more gay-friendly. He made the comment with the Independent's Johann Hari. Money quote:

"I don't want to get into a huge row with the Archbishop here ... but the Church has to do some of the things that the Conservative Party has been through - sorting this issue out and recognising that full equality is a bottom-line, full essential."

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Except for Catholics of course, can't have them marrying into the monarchy, God forbid.

  • Comment number 2.

    We have the Pope who is our Queen, kinda.

  • Comment number 3.


    Gay equality - a bottom-line issue. You've got to love it even if he is a Conservative.

    It's not just the Conservative party who have had to get their act together - Dave has had to journey towards the light quite a distance on this one himself. I don't for a moment wonder if it's all a cynical vote-winning ploy.

  • Comment number 4.

    Its a pity that David Cameron - for political reasons - feels unable to tell the truth about the abnormal nature of same-sex relationships and the harm the acceptance of such relationships is having on our society.

    I am aware that the Anglican Church is having its own difficuties with this issue - unfortunately the fear of division is carrying more weight than faithfulness to what God says in Scripture. But the Christian Church in general is better employed in supporting marriage, while also encouraging homosexual people to leave their sinful lifestyle and to find forgiveness and new life in Jesus Christ.

    What else is the Church for?

  • Comment number 5.

    McC & RJB
    If I'm following the argument of posts 1 & 2 correctly , the greatest antidote for sectarianism would be for the Pope to marry into the Royal Family.
    Have I followed you argument correctly?

    GV

  • Comment number 6.


    Graham why not think on-thread and out of the box. What about a gay civil partnership? You never know - two octogenarian reactionaries with an interest in religion might be very happy together - Jo and Phil Windzinger has a certain ring to it.

  • Comment number 7.

    There's a mental image that'll haunt me till the grave

  • Comment number 8.

    I think their age may be problematic to any sort of ecumenical romantic union. I used to help a group of elderly men fight for their rights. They held a march through the city and tried to hang a big banner from a big tree. Unfortunately, they couldnt get it up.

Ìý

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.