´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

T(h)inker of the year

William Crawley | 17:24 UK time, Friday, 11 February 2011

An artistic friend of mine send me this mock-up in honour of my unlikely success at the Slugger Awards. I don't think it entirely captures my face, but the rest is spot on.


Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Apparently The Thinker was originally meant to depict Dante in front of the Gates of Hell, pondering his great poem, The Divine Comedy.

    So seeing you positioned there at the 'gates' of your blog, I don't know where that leaves the rest of us?! Perhaps generating more heat than light!!

    More seriously... congratulations on your award.

  • Comment number 2.

    Solid shoulders that could do wonders with a discus or a javelin, but what big hands!

    Here is something that some other thinkers might be interested in. "The Opium of the People" will be broadcast on Radio 3 tomorrow night and will "explores the places where atheism and pantheism intersect".

    /programmes/b00yhrdq

  • Comment number 3.


    Mazeltov!


    (We'll just ignore the prohibition on graven images...)


    >8-D

  • Comment number 4.

    It's the spitting image of you. You look much better than David Dunseath.

  • Comment number 5.

    I wonder what the large number of awards ceremonies in the media and entertainment world tell us about this group's sense of its own importance. Is there any other group in society which feels the need to pat itself on the back on such a regular basis?

  • Comment number 6.

    I knew a scientist who got the OBE for fifty years studying the hind legs of cows. Outside Buckingham Palace after the ceremony he ststed that he it wasnt the first time he had received a pat on the back.
    - The Two Ronnies, 1976.

  • Comment number 7.

    Does thinking about religion count as proper thinking?

  • Comment number 8.

    "Does thinking about religion count as proper thinking?"

    Well obviously not, considering that there are far more profitable things to 'think' about, such as the idea of everlasting mindlessness. Now that really is a decent concept to get your brain cells stuck into, innit?

    But, of course, we know what 'the thinker' was really thinking about: "Where did I leave my flippin' clothes when I agreed to take part in that blinkin' Spencer Tunick shoot!"

  • Comment number 9.

    Does thinking about religion count as proper thinking?

    -- Yes.

  • Comment number 10.

    To the thinker......

    What is 'proper thinking' and presumably there is 'non-proper thinking' and what differentiates them?

    How do you know if you are thinking properly? Is it by outer agreement? or something else?

    Do you know where your thoughts come from? How are they generated?

Ìý

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.