´óÏó´«Ã½

« Previous | Main | Next »

Travelling with Eisenhower

Post categories: ,Ìý,Ìý

William Crawley | 08:32 UK time, Sunday, 8 April 2012

I'm writing this blog entry from Philadelphia, at the start of an eight-week tour of the United States that will see me visit New York, Boston, Washington DC, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and other locations in the mid-west including Kentucky and Tennesee. Let me explain why I'm here. I've been selected as one of twenty-one international , which will enable me to criss-cross the US meeting some significant American leaders to explore a bespoke focused project. For the next two months, I'll be examining some key "" debates in this presidential election year. I'll be meeting politicians, lobbyists, academics, religious leaders and hearing from other influential voices. I'll be posting about some of those meetings and sharing some of what I learn on the way.


This week, I've been meeting the other Fellows here in Philadelphia and attending briefings on American politics, foreign policy and learning more about the meetings that have been scheduled for me during my visit to the US. A highlight so far was our off-the-record seminar with , who is the US Deputy Secretary of State. A career foreign service official, Ambassador Burns walked us through US foreign policy in various global regions in an extraordinarily insightful session. He took questions and offered us an impressive descriptive analysis of America's place in the world today.

We continue our briefings tomorrow at City Hall: we'll be meeting local councillors, state representatives and federal level politicians, including a current senatorial candidate. Please suggest any questions or topics you think I can helpfully explore in my many meetings, or indeed suggest anyone you recommend I should meet. I'll be recording some interviews as I go for eventual broadcast.

Comments

  • Comment number 1.

    Will,

    You may like to watch , entitled "Poor America"...

    ... and then ask those Republican Christians you happen to meet whether they think it is God's will to show mercy to the poor of America, or to crush them even further.

    Perhaps you could ask such people if they think the law of God encourages us to...

    1) care for the poor
    2) ignore the poor
    3) increase the misery of the poor.

    And then ask them to justify their response biblically.

    The programme features one of the Republican debates, where the question was asked as to what the panelists think should happen to someone without health insurance who went into a coma. The response was deeply disturbing, with some audience members shouting "yeah" to the question as to whether society should let the man die.

    So there's a good question to ask on your travels: Should society let such a man die?

    And if the answer is "yes", then perhaps a follow-up question would be: "What do you understand by the word 'patriotism' if you do not wish to protect the lives of some of your fellow citizens?"

    Have a good time.

  • Comment number 2.

    That edition of Panorama is grim. I think the jobs market has picked up a bit since the programme was made, so some of the poor will be getting back on their feet.

    Nothing uplifting comes immediately to my mind, I'm afraid. I am interested in how criminals are dealt with, in particular paedophiles. Is Jessica Ahlquist still being bullied by Christians? On a less depressing note I am also interested in the issue of America's growing number of Spanish speakers. No Protestant sits on the Supreme Court - does it mean anything? Question for a potential senator: Who is the Chinese premier? I read that an electric version of the DeLorean was being developed, but that might have been an April Fool's Day joke.

  • Comment number 3.

    @1. logica_sine_vanitate,
    I think the question that many Americans might pose is whether caring for the poor through taxation is scriptural?

  • Comment number 4.

    mscracker (@ 3) -

    I think the question that many Americans might pose is whether caring for the poor through taxation is scriptural?


    Which then implies a further question: is taxation itself scriptural?

    Because if it is wrong to help the poor through the tax system, then how can it be right to help anyone else through that system?
  • Comment number 5.

    @4. logica_sine_vanitate,
    I think to tithe is certainly scriptural & is something I'd recommend.Taxation is a civic issue & is not voluntary.

  • Comment number 6.

    I would be interested in hearing something on the American porn industry, which I have read is worth billions of dollars.

  • Comment number 7.

    I hear there’s a correlation between the American porn industry and the American political I mean religion industry.

  • Comment number 8.

    On a side note. Since the scholarship is named after Eisenhower. On your day off you could visit the grave of Sir John Dill,a Lurgan man and the only foreigner buried in Arlington National Cemetery. He was highly thought of by Eisenhowers compatriots.

  • Comment number 9.

    Will,

    Since the fall of the Berlin Wall and extinction of soviet communism appears to have completely passed Republican front-runner Mitt Wrongney by ("[Russia] is without question our number one geopolitical foe"), if you have a chance, perhaps you might like to give him a gentle nudge and point him towards an Atlas showing the changes that have taken place since 1989.

    Actually though, i've recently been giving some thought to the importance of Ronald Reagan's contribution, in bringing about those changes. I consider Blessed John Paul II to have been the primary agent in defeating communism, but Reagan's role should not be underestimated. And i believe his take on the Cold War can usefully be recycled for the pro-life cause:

    "We win. They lose. What do you think of that?"

    Further inspiration, incidentally, can be taken from the struggle of Emily Pankhurst and the suffragettes in the early years of the 20th century, to win recognition for the human and civil rights of women. Pro-lifers must win the same recognition - though renouncing all forms of violence - for unborn children. And we will.

  • Comment number 10.

    @9. Theophane ,
    Mitt Romney may be incorrect regarding Russia but his election would be a step in the right direction for pro-life issues.

  • Comment number 11.

    mscracker;

    Hi - Happy Easter to you.

    "Mitt Romney may be incorrect regarding Russia but his election would be a step in the right direction for pro-life issues."

    But don't you think he's Obama's preferred candidate?

  • Comment number 12.

    @11-Theophane,
    A very happy Easter to you,too!
    No, I think in the best circumstances, Romney's the candidate that Pres.Obama would fear the most.But our GOP historically tends to splinter off into factions to the point where there's no energy left to unite behind a strong candidate.I've been involved in local politics & as a delegate to GOP conventions & it becomes a contest of who's the most conservative, rather than how can we actually win an election.I'm 100% pro-life-no exceptions, but if we lose the election because Mr. Romney can't pass some conservative litmus test, how does that further the cause? It just plays right into the hands of Democrats.

  • Comment number 13.

    "I'm writing this blog entry from Philadelphia, at the start of an eight-week tour of the United States that will see me visit New York, Boston, Washington DC, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and other locations in the mid-west including Kentucky and Tennesee. "
    **
    I hope you enjoy your visit to Kentucky & Tennessee, but I've never heard them included in "MidWestern" states before...Hope you get to try some BBQ while you're here.

  • Comment number 14.

    (Be sure & look for some country ham bisquits, too.)

  • Comment number 15.

    I'm in Nashville now - definitely not the mid-west; yes that was a daft comment written too quickly on a train. I mean I'll be in the mid-west AND Kentucky and Tennesee.

  • Comment number 16.

    Ìý
    Pardon me, Will. Was it the Chattanooga Choo Choo?

Ìý

´óÏó´«Ã½ iD

´óÏó´«Ã½ navigation

´óÏó´«Ã½ © 2014 The ´óÏó´«Ã½ is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.